Safety and Effectiveness of Valbenazine as Adjunct Therapy to Botulinum Toxin Injections in Cervical Dystonia

May 8, 2026 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
The most common form of idiopathic dystonia is adult-onset cervical dystonia (CD), a focal form of dystonia affecting the muscles of the neck. CD is often associated with pain and limited range of motion, and frequently leads to reduced quality of life and disability. Effective long-term treatment options are extremely limited. Recurring botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections can ease the symptoms of CD, but they frequently provide only partial relief and can be associated with intolerable side effects. Deep brain stimulation can be used to treat more severe cases of CD, but this neurosurgical procedure is invasive, on average only about 50% effective and may lead to serious adverse effects. Novel treatment approaches for CD are desperately needed to alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life for the many who suffer from this chronic and disabling neurological disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The dopaminergic system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of hyperkinetic movement disorders including dystonia. For example, it is well established that acute and chronic dystonia syndromes can be caused by dopamine receptor-blocking drugs. Several animal and human imaging studies also support the presence of abnormal dopaminergic function in idiopathic forms of dystonia. Although historically dopamine receptor-blocking medications have been used to treat dystonia, early clinical trials have been limited and the results mixed. The atypical neuroleptic clozapine was found to be moderately effective in treating segmental and generalized dystonia, but its usefulness was limited by potential adverse effects. Another atypical neuroleptic risperidone has been reported to be effective in a 4-week trial of five patients with various forms of dystonia. Dopamine depleting medications such as the VMAT2 inhibitor tetrabenazine has also been found helpful in some patients with dystonia, particularly those with tardive dystonia, which has overlapping phenomenology with idiopathic dystonia. The more recently developed VMAT2 inhibitor valbenazine has demonstrated clear benefit in tardive dyskinesia, but their therapeutic benefit in idiopathic dystonia has not been evaluated in a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Off label uses and an open-label study of valbenazine suggest it could provide some benefit and be well tolerated in idiopathic CD patient populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic CD (neck musculature first and most prominently affected)
  • 18-75 years old (participants excluded if their dystonia symptoms began before age 18 as childhood-onset dystonia typically represents a genetic and/or primary generalized form of dystonia)
  • Onset of dystonia ≥18 years old, no known hyperkinetic movement disorder-related genetic mutation
  • Dystonia severity more than minimal and not very severe as defined by Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale-2 Motor Severity (TWSTRS-2-Severity) score ≥ 5 and ≤ 20.
  • Stable on botulinum toxin injections last 90 days (BoNT dose change <10% and patient reported stability of response over last two injection cycles)
  • Stable on other neuroactive medications.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of deep brain stimulation
  • History of uncontrolled or untreated depression in the prior 3 months, suicidality, or history of suicide attempts
  • History of uncontrolled liver disease or failure
  • History of tardive dyskinesia or tardive dystonia
  • Currently taking dopaminergic and/or anti-dopaminergic medications including VMAT2 inhibitors or other antipsychotic medications
  • Exposure to dopaminergic and/or anti-dopaminergic medications including VMAT2 inhibitors or other antipsychotic medications in the last 30 days -Presence of parkinsonism or other movement disorder other than dystonia on exam -Receiving botulinum toxin injections at a planned frequency other than every 3 months or typically receive injections at intervals <11 weeks or >13 weeks -Known history of long QT syndrome or cardiac tachyarrhythmia or any clinically significant cardiac abnormality.
  • Prolonged QTc as defined by > 450 msec for men and > 470 msec for women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo for their initial injection cycle then switch onto Valbenazine for next injections.
Subject will receive the placebo for their initial injection cycle (for 3 months) and then switch onto Valbenazine at the time of their next injections.(next 3 months)
Placebo
To assess if valbenazine 80mg daily improves motor symptoms in idiopathic CD patients with persistent symptoms despite current treated with botulinum toxin injections.
Experimental: Albenazine for the first injection cycle then switch to Placebo for next injections
Subject will receive albenazine for the first injection cycle (duration of 3 months) and then switch onto Placebo at the time of their next injections (remain on it for the next 3 months).
Placebo
To assess if valbenazine 80mg daily improves motor symptoms in idiopathic CD patients with persistent symptoms despite current treated with botulinum toxin injections.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale-2 (TWSTRS)-severity score change at 12 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks of treatment

TWSTRS-2-severity score change at 12 weeks of treatment. The isolated TWSTRS-2-Severity score change was chosen as the primary outcome because the TWSTRS-2-Severity had items dropped from the original TWSTRS as they failed to meet criteria for utility in clinimetric testing,11 and because the primary effect of Valbenazine is expected to be on the motor symptoms and less on pain and disability. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS-2) uses the following scoring system for severity:

0: Absent, 1: Mild, which is less than one-third of the possible range and can be intermittent or constant 2: Moderate, which is one-third to two-thirds of the possible range and constant, or severe, which is more than two-thirds of the possible range and intermittent, and 3: Severe and constant

baseline and 12 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDSRS)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Pain in Dystonia Scale (PIDS), The GDS is a Likert type scale with ratings from 0 to 10 (0 is no dystonia, 1 minimal, 5 moderate and 10 severe dystonia). There are no modifying ratings or weighting factors in the GDS. The total score is the sum of the scores for all the body areas. The maximal total score of the GDS is 140.
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
It comprises 14 items (7 items each for anxiety and depression), with a score ranging between 0 and 21 for the anxiety and depression subscales. For each subscale the total score is at most 21. A score of ≥11 is considered a clinically significant disorder, whereas a score between 8 and 10 suggests a mild disorder.
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more acute sleep disturbances. Developers have suggested a cut- off score of 5 for the global scale as it correctly identified 88.5% of the patient group in their validation study.
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire designed to measure sleep propensity in a simple, standardized way (only 8 questions on a total scale of 0 to 24).
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile - 58 item (CDIP-58)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
A Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58) score represents a patient's self-reported assessment of how much their cervical dystonia impacts their quality of life, with a higher score indicating a greater negative impact across various aspects like pain, movement limitations, sleep disturbances, mood, and social functioning; essentially, a higher score means a more significant impact from their cervical dystonia. The score is calculated from 58 questions, each rated on a scale, resulting in a total score between 0 (no impact) and 100 (severe impact).
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale (CGI-S)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
The Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) is a 7-point categorical scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis.The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) asks the clinician one question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated on the following seven-point scale: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4: Moderately ill 5: Markedly ill 6: Severely ill 7: Among the most extremely ill patients
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Patient Global Impression of Severity scale (PGI-S)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scale is a single-item, 6-point, self-administered tool and is used to assess health severity in both health economics evaluation and as an outcome measure in clinical trials in a range of diseases.The highest achievable stage in PGI is Level I, which is for scores 951-1000. In between, an equal width of 50 points has been kept for each Level. In the PGI, Level II means PGI score 901-950, Level III: 851-900, Level IV: 801-850, and so on up to Level IX: 551-600.
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is an assessment tool that. evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. The scale includes 4 dimensions: hopelessness, suicidal ideation, negative self-evaluation, and hostility. Each of the sub dimensions receives a total score and the sum of all scores gives the overall suicide probability score. Total scores that can be obtained from the scale range from 36 to 144
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
Pain in Dystonia Scale (PIDS)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)
PIDS offers practicality featuring self-rating of pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, evaluation of pain across body regions, assessment of pain's impact on daily activities, and consideration of external factors that trigger or alleviate pain.The Scale is a 5-point, criterion-based, ordinal scale designed to assess dystonia in eight body regions: eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, and the four extremities (see Appendix I). Raters score dystonia as none (0), slight (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 1) and Visit 3 (Week 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian Berman, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Dystonia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe