Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Baloxavir Marboxil in Chinese Pediatric Participants 1 to <12 Years of Age With Influenza Symptoms

April 6, 2026 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Baloxavir Marboxil in Chinese Pediatric Patients 1 to <12 Years of Age With Influenza Symptoms

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of a single dose baloxavir marboxil compared with 5 days of oseltamivir administered twice a day (BID) in Chinese pediatric participants aged 1 to < 12 years with influenza symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Changde, China, DUMMY_VALUE
        • The First People's Hospital of Changde
      • Changsha, China, 410007
        • Peoples Hospital of Hunan Province
      • Chengdu, China, 610091
        • Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital
      • Chongqing, China, 402260
        • Chongqing University Jiangjin Hospital
      • Chongqing, China, DUMMY_VALUE
        • Childern's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
      • Langfang, China, 065000
        • Hebei Petro China Central Hospital
      • Liaocheng, China, 252000
        • Liaocheng People's Hospital
      • Linfen, China, 041000
        • Linfen Central Hospital
      • Liuchow, China, 545006
        • Liuzhou People's Hospital
      • Ningbo, China, 315021
        • Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital
      • Sanmenxia, China, DUMMY_VALUE
        • Sanmenxia Central Hospital
      • Sanya, China, 572000
        • The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province
      • Shantou, China, 515051
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou university Medical College
      • Shaoyang, China, DUMMY_VALUE
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Shaoyang University
      • Shenzhen, China, 518107
        • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital
      • Xiamen, China, 361001
        • Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A participant who has a diagnosis of influenza virus infection and meets all the following conditions:

    • Fever ≥ 38°C (tympanic temperature) at screening
    • At least one of the respiratory symptoms of influenza virus infection
  • A rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) shows positive for influenza A/B, e.g., point-of-care/local laboratory results with use of nasal aspirate, throat swab, or nasal drip/droplet (or other appropriate sample)
  • The time interval between the onset of symptoms and screening is ≤ 48 hours
  • PCR (-) or antigen test (-) for severe acute respiratory virus-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using point-of-care/local laboratory test with nasal aspirate, throat swab, or nasal drip/droplet (or other appropriate sample)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A participant having severe influenza virus infection symptoms requiring inpatient treatment
  • Received systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy
  • Primary immunodeficiency syndrome
  • History of organ transplantation
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Immunization with a live/attenuated influenza vaccine in 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Previous malignancy within the last 5 years or has an active cancer at any site
  • A participant who received any medications with anti-flu effect such as baloxavir, peramivir, oseltamivir, zanamivir, favipiravir, arbidol, amantadine or traditional Chinese anti-influenza medicines within 30 days before screening
  • Diagnosed with or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, or close contacts of diagnosed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
  • Severe underlying disease or condition potentially affecting study evaluation in the opinion of the investigator/sub-investigator
  • A participant who received an investigational or unapproved drug product within 30 days or 5 x the half-life before screening, whichever is longer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Baloxavir Marboxil
Participants will receive a single oral dose of baloxavir marboxil on Day 1 based on body weight.
Baloxavir marboxil will be administered as oral suspension: 2 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) (if weight < 20 kg), 40 mg (if weight ≥ 20 kg to < 80 kg), or 80 mg (if weight ≥ 80 kg).
Active Comparator: Oseltamivir
Participants will receive oseltamivir twice a day for 5 days based on body weight.
Oseltamivir will be administered as oral capsule: 30 mg (if weight ≤15 kg), 45 mg (if weight > 15 kg to ≥ 23 kg), 60 mg (if weight > 23 kg to ≤ 40 kg) or 75 mg (if weight > 40 kg), twice daily (BID) for 5 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.
Up to Day 29

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Alleviation of Influenza Signs and Symptoms (TTAS)
Time Frame: Up to Day 15

TTAS was defined as the length of time taken from start of treatment to point at which all of following criteria were met & remained so for at least 21.5 hours:

  • Score of 0 (no problem) or 1 (minor problem) for cough & nasal symptoms (Items 14 & 15 of Canadian Acute Respiratory Illness and Flu Scale [CARIFS]);
  • A "yes" response to following question- "Since last assessment has participant been able to return to day care/school, or resume his/her normal daily activity in same way as performed prior to developing flu?";
  • Return to afebrile state (tympanic temperature ≤ 37.2 degree Celsius [°C]). Median time was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method.
Up to Day 15
Duration of Fever
Time Frame: Up to Day 15
Duration of fever was defined as the length of time from start of treatment to return to afebrile state (tympanic temperature ≤ 37.2°C) and remaining so for at least 21.5 hours. Participants who were afebrile at baseline (tympanic temperature ≤ 37.2 °C) or whose body temperature was not collected were excluded from the analysis. Median time was estimated using K-M method.
Up to Day 15
Duration of Symptoms
Time Frame: Up to Day 15
Duration of symptoms was defined as the length of time from start of treatment to alleviation of all symptoms as defined by a score of 0 (no problem) or 1 (minor problem) and remaining so for at least 21.5 hours, for all 18 symptoms specified in the CARIFS questionnaire. Participants who withdrew prior to an event of interest or did not experience resolution of symptoms were censored at the last observation time point. Median time was estimated using K-M method.
Up to Day 15
Time to Return to Normal Health and Activity Based on the CARIFS Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to Day 15
Time to return to normal health and activity was defined as time from start of treatment to normal health and activity. Normal health & activity was identified by a 'yes' response to the following question on the CARIFS: "Since the last assessment has the participant been able to return to day care/school, or resume his/her normal daily activity in the same way as performed prior to developing the flu?". Median time was estimated using K-M method.
Up to Day 15
Number of Participants With Influenza-related Complications
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Influenza-related complications included death, hospitalization, radiologically-confirmed pneumonia, bronchitis, sinusitis, otitis media, encephalitis/encephalopathy, febrile seizures, and myositis.
Up to Day 29
Percentage of Participants Requiring Antibiotics for Influenza-related Complications
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Influenza-related complications included death, hospitalization, radiologically-confirmed pneumonia, bronchitis, sinusitis, otitis media, encephalitis/encephalopathy, febrile seizures, and myositis. Percentages have been rounded off.
Up to Day 29
Time to Cessation of Viral Shedding by Virus Titer
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Time to cessation of viral shedding by virus titer was defined as the time, in hours, between the initiation of study treatment and the first time when the influenza virus titer was below the lower limit of detection (LLoD) (0.75 log10 tissue culture infectious dose [TCID] 50/milliliters [mL]). Participants whose virus ribonucleic acid (RNA) did not reach the limit by the last observation timepoint were treated as censored at that timepoint. Median time was estimated using K-M method.
Up to Day 29
Time to Cessation of Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase - Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Using Samples From Respiratory Swabs
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Time to cessation of viral shedding by RT-PCR was defined as the time between the initiation of study treatment and the first time when the virus RNA by RT-PCR qualitative result is below the LLoD (qualitative assessment). For the participants with multiple virus types, time to cessation of viral shedding by RT-PCR was defined as the time between the initiation of the study treatment and first time when the virus RNA by RT-PCR qualitative result is negative for all virus types. Participants whose virus RNA did not reach the limit by the last observation timepoint were censored at that timepoint. Median time was estimated using K-M method.
Up to Day 29
Change From Baseline in Influenza Virus Titer Over Time Using Samples From Respiratory Swabs
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Change from baseline in influenza virus titer (log10 TCID50/mL) on Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15 are presented. Influenza virus titer on specified time points was analysed with use of samples from respiratory swabs. If influenza virus titer was less than the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ), the virus titer was imputed as LLoQ - 0.001 (0.749 log10 TCID50/mL). Only participants with a positive virus titer on Day 1 were included in this analysis.
Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Change From Baseline in Amount of Virus RNA (RT-PCR) at Each Timepoint Using Samples From Respiratory Swabs
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
If the amount of virus RNA was less than the LLoQ, the amount of virus RNA was imputed as LLoQ - 0.001 (2.79 log10 vp/mL for influenza A and 2.63 log10 vp/mL for influenza B). If a participant was infected with multiple virus types, the sum of those amounts of virus RNA was used for analysis. Participants positive for virus RNA by RT-PCR on Day 1 were included in this analysis. log10 vp/mL=log 10 virus particles per milliliter.
Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Percentage of Participants With Positive Influenza Virus Titer Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Percentage of participants with positive influenza virus titer was defined as the percentage of participants whose influenza virus titer was not less than the LLoD (0.75 log10 TCID50/mL) or positive among those assessed for influenza virus titer on specified timepoints. Analyses were done with use of samples from respiratory swabs. Participants with a positive influenza virus titer on Day 1 were be included in this analysis. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Percentage of Participants Positive by RT-PCR at Each Timepoint Using Samples From Respiratory Swabs
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Percentage of participants with positive influenza virus titer was defined as the percentage of participants with a positive qualitative result among those assessed by RT-PCR on specified timepoints. Analyses were done with use of samples from respiratory swabs. Participants positive for virus RNA by RT-PCR on Day 1 were be included in this analysis. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Days 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15
Area Under the Curve (AUC) in Virus Titer
Time Frame: Up to Day 10
AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method. Participants with a positive virus titer on Day 1 were included in this analysis. The lower limit was defined as 0.75 log10 TCID50/mL for flu A and flu B. If a participant was infected with multiple virus types, the sum of those virus titers was used for analysis. log10 TCID50/mL*h=log10 TCID50 per milliliter-hours. Analyses were done with use of samples from respiratory swabs.
Up to Day 10
AUC in the Amount of Virus RNA (RT-PCR) Using Samples From Respiratory Swabs
Time Frame: Up to Day 10
AUC in virus RNA (RT-PCR) AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method. Participants positive for virus RNA by RT-PCR on Day 1 were included in this analysis. If a participant was infected with multiple virus types, the sum of the amount of virus RNA was used for analysis. log10 vp/mL*h=log 10 virus particles per milliliter-hours.
Up to Day 10
Plasma Concentrations of S-033447 (Active Metabolite)
Time Frame: Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
S-033447 is an active metabolite of baloxavir marboxil.
Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of S-033447
Time Frame: Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
S-033447 is an active metabolite of baloxavir marboxil.
Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of S-033447
Time Frame: Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
S-033447 is an active metabolite of baloxavir marboxil.
Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of S-033447
Time Frame: Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
S-033447 is an active metabolite of baloxavir marboxil.
Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of S-033447
Time Frame: Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
S-033447 is an active metabolite of baloxavir marboxil.
Post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4, and 6
Percentage of Participants With Polymorphic and Treatment-emergent Amino Acid Substitutions in the Polymerase Acidic (PA) Gene
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Sanger sequencing of the influenza PA gene was performed to evaluate the incidence of polymorphic and treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions in baloxavir-treated participants with evaluable virus.
Up to Day 29
Drug Susceptibility in Participants With Evaluable Virus
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Drug susceptibility of the influenza virus, the 50% effective concentration (EC50) of baloxavir was measured by the ViroSpot™ assay using baseline swab samples for participants who received baloxavir marboxil. EC50 values were compared with EC50 values of reference strains and the respective ratio (EC50 / EC50 reference) was reported. The following influenza virus vaccines strains from the 2024/25 Northern hemisphere season were used as references: A/Wisconsin/67/2022 (H1N1) pdm09-like virus, A/Massachusetts/18/2022 (H3N2)-like virus and B/Austria/1359417/2021-like virus (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage). In the absence of established thresholds for baloxavir, reduced susceptibility was defined according to the WHO criteria for neurainidase inhibitor (NAI) as fold-changes in EC50 (EC50 / EC50 of reference) > 10 for influenza A and > 5 for influenza B viruses.
Up to Day 29
Percentage of Participants With Responses to Palatability and Acceptability Questionnaire
Time Frame: On Day 1
A two-question palatability and acceptability questionnaire was used to record palatability and acceptability. Palatability of baloxavir marboxil was evaluated by response to the following question, "How was the taste of the medicine? Please pick the face that best matches how you/the child felt about the taste". The responses ranged from: like very much, like a little, not sure, dislike a little, or dislike very much. Acceptability of baloxavir marboxil was evaluated by response to the following question, "Would you/the child be happy to take the medicine again?" The responses ranged from: Yes, No, or Not sure. The questionnaire was completed as soon as possible after swallowing the baloxavir marboxil drug solution on Day 1. Percentages have been rounded off.
On Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe