Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing in Symptomatic Patients With Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (PACE-nHCM)

February 8, 2026 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center

This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction ≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires.

The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires.

The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure. An interim data safety analysis will be conducted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non obstructive HCM: Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) gradient <30mmHg at rest and with provocation
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA II-III) symptoms
  • Normal intrinsic conduction system
  • Suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • LVEF <50%
  • LVOT gradient > 30mmHg at rest or with provocation
  • Prolonged PR > 250ms
  • Baseline RV-pacing burden of > 1% more than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation
  • Aortic valve replacement in the past one year
  • Significant primary pulmonary disease on home oxygen
  • Uncontrolled hypertension as defined by BP >160/100 mmHg on two measurements ≥15 minutes apart

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: myPACE+
Participants will be programmed to a personalized lower rate setting based on the myPACE+ resting heart rate algorithm will be conducted using the myPACE+ algorithm
myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent
No Intervention: Usual Care
Standard of care. Participants will retain a standard pacing lower rate setting of 60 beats per minute (bpm).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) status
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in HRQoL from prior to randomization to the time of 3-month follow-up will be assessed based on patient responses to the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). The KCCQ-12 is a validated health status measure for patients with heart failure. An overall summary score (OSS) is tabulated based on responses ranging from 0-100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible HRQoL status. Change from baseline scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. A logistic mixed-effect model will be employed to calculate the odds ratio for a ≥ 5 point or more improvement of the KCCQ-OSS, which is considered clinically meaningful.
Baseline to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in NT-proBNP concentration from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and subsequently compared between groups. Samples will be obtained by venipuncture and submitted to a local laboratory for analysis. While normal NT-proBNP levels vary by age, the normal threshold for those under 50 years of age is 450 pg/mL, while it is 900 pg/mL for those greater than 50 years of age. Higher than normal NT-proBNP levels may be indicative of heart failure. As part of an exploratory analysis for this trial a >29% decrease in NT-proBNP concentration from baseline will be considered a "clinically meaningful threshold"
Baseline to 3 months
Change in Peak Oxygen (pVO2) Uptake and predicted pVO2
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pVO2 and predicted pVO2 from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). CPET is a functional assessment that helps to detect disorders affecting the system involved in oxygen transport and utilization through the analysis of gas exchange during exercise. Change in pVO2 uptake from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. An increase in pVO2 >1.5mL/kg/min from baseline will be considered a "clinically meaningful threshold" as part of an exploratory analysis for this trial.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed by interrogation of the pacemaker. Pacemaker-detected data will be continuously collected and stored by the pacemaker. Atrial arrhythmia burden is quantified as the percentage of time per day the patient is in atrial fibrillation (AF). Change in percentage over time will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. Pacemaker-detected arrhythmia burden is associated with more adverse cardiac outcomes including increased risk of stroke or thromboembolism.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity level
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity levels from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using the pacemaker's built-in accelerometer. This accelerometer can measure a patient's physical activity levels by detecting the frequency and amplitude of a patient's motion. The device measures the number of hours/minutes the patient is active, based on a threshold for the number and magnitude of accelerometer signal deflections. Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity levels from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. As part of an exploratory analysis for this trial an increase in pacemaker detected daily activity >0.5 hour/day from baseline will be considered a "clinically meaningful threshold".
Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic parameters: Left Atrial (LA) Strain
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in LA strain from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using TTE. Strain is a measure of deformation of the myocardium during the cardiac cycle in multiple directions; lengthening, shortening and thickening and is expressed as a fractional length change, where shortening is a negative value and lengthening a positive value. The difference between length at the reference point (end-diastole) and the current length (end-systole) will be calculated in accordance with American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) January 2015 guidelines related to strains. This is then divided by original reference length and then expressed as a percentage for the given timepoint. Change in this percentage from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. LA strain is an earlier marker of underlying cardiovascular pathology than many conventional echocardiographic parameters given the relatively thinner walls of the atria.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic parameters: Left Ventricular (LV) Strain
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in LV strain from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Strain is a measure of deformation of the myocardium during the cardiac cycle in multiple directions; lengthening, shortening and thickening and is expressed as a fractional length change, where shortening is a negative value and lengthening a positive value. The difference between length at the reference point (end-diastole) and the current length (end-systole) will be calculated in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines related to strain. This is then divided by original reference length and then expressed as a percentage for the given timepoint. Change in this percentage from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. LV Strain can be used for the early detection of left ventricular dysfunction by detecting subtle changes in deformation of heart muscle, which can lead to earlier diagnosis/prognosis.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic E/e' ratio
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic E/e' ratio from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). E/e' ratio is a measure of diastolic function that is calculated by dividing the peak E wave velocity (early filling velocity, or E) by the peak e' wave velocity (or the early relaxation velocity, e') and will be calculated in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. Elevated E/e' ratios are a key indicator of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and, as such, are often used to assess the severity of diastolic dysfunction. Change in E/e' ratios will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Ventricular Myocardial Thickness (LVMT)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change LVMT from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be evaluated using motion-mode echocardiography in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. This one-dimensional view allows for digitized, linear measurements of LV thickness in the parasternal long-axis view. Increased LV myocardial wall thickness can lead to Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), making it more difficult for the heart to pump blood and increase the risk of unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes. Change in LV myocardial thickness will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Atrial (LA) chamber size
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in LA chamber size from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. An enlarged left atrium, known as Left Atrial Enlargement (LAE), is a result of increased left atrial pressure over a prolonged period and can be a predictor of clinically significant cardiovascular diseases and heart failure. Change in LA chamber size from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Ventricular (LV) chamber size
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in LV chamber size from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. An increased left ventricular chamber size is caused by elevated blood pressure over a prolonged period and can lead to Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) complications of which can lead to heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Change in LV chamber size from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Baseline to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luigi Di Biase, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on myPACE+ algorithm

Subscribe