Testing and Evaluating a Psychoeducation Tool and Guidelines for Victims of Violence in Belgian Hospitals. (Operatie Alert)

March 5, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Testing and Evaluating a Psychoeducational Toolkit and Clinical Screening Guidelines for Victims of Domestic and Sexual Violence in Belgian Hospitals.

The "Operation Alert/Operatie Alert/Opération Alerte" project, developed by UGent-ICRH and UZGent with funding from the Belgian Federal Public Service for Health, focuses on strengthening basic competencies to better and more quickly identify signs of violence. It also aims to provide victim-centered care and refer to specialized services when necessary. This initiative combines training for healthcare providers with practical tools, such as a psycho-education tool and clinical guidelines, to enhance care delivery. Below is an overview of the project's main components:

Sub-Study 1: Psycho-education Tool

  • Objective: Develop and evaluate a tool to support healthcare providers and patients in understanding and addressing sexual and domestic violence, trauma, and their impacts on well-being.
  • Tool Description: A set of cards presented in a calendar format, featuring illustrations on one side and explanatory text on the other.

Target Groups: Healthcare providers and victims/patients.

  • Development process: The tool was developed based on literature and input from experts and stakeholders during regular meetings.
  • Testing Phase: The tool will undergo a pilot study in selected hospitals and non-profit organizations (NGOs) working with victims of violence.
  • Evaluation: The tool's acceptability, usability, and relevance to the recovery process will be assessed through feedback collected via questionnaires from both healthcare providers and victims/patients.

Sub-Study 2: Guidelines Older Adults

  • Objective: Develop and implement guidelines for screening violence among older adults and providing appropriate care for victims of various forms of violence (psychological, physical, (socio-)economic, and sexual).
  • Tool Description: A guideline that includes a screening protocol, care and referral pathways, and theoretical background on the topic.
  • Target Group: Older adults with sufficient cognitive abilities.
  • Development Process: The guidelines are informed by a literature review, expert, and stakeholder input through regular meetings and focus groups, and a pilot study involving cognitively capable older adults in the geriatric departments of four hospitals.
  • Testing Phase: The screening protocol is integrated into standard care procedures, such as intake interviews or geriatric assessments. It is implemented by multidisciplinary professionals, including physicians, nurses, psychologists, occupational therapists, and social workers.
  • Evaluation: Feedback on the guidelines is collected from healthcare providers via questionnaires. Older adults themselves are not directly involved in the evaluation, as the screening protocol is intentionally embedded discreetly within standard care procedures.

Training and Support The project includes a robust training component delivered through educational online modules designed to equip healthcare providers with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively use the tools and guidelines developed.

Languages and Application The study materials and procedures are conducted in both French and Dutch, reflecting Belgium's bilingual context.

Significance This project highlights the importance of tailored support for victims of violence and a systematic approach to care within clinical settings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2018
      • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2000
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Pierre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charlotte Rousseau, MD
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Recruiting
        • SOSEnfants Bruxelles ASBL
        • Contact:
      • Charleroi, Belgium, 6000
      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liege
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolas Berg, MD
      • Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Delta
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lieven Wostyn, MD
      • Saint-Servais, Belgium, 5002

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Substudy 1: Psycho-education Tool

  • Healthcare Providers: In-hospital healthcare providers who used the psycho-education tool during the pilot phase with a victim of violence.
  • Victims/Patients: Victims of violence aged 16 years or older who received psycho-education from an in-hospital healthcare provider during the pilot phase.

Substudy 2: Guideline

  • Healthcare Providers: In-hospital healthcare providers who used the guideline during the pilot phase with an older adult.
  • Older Adults/Patients: Older adults with sufficient cognitive abilities who were admitted to the geriatric department (either for a day clinic or a longer stay).

Exclusion Criteria:

Substudy 1: Psycho-education tool

  • Victims under the age of 16. Substudy 2: Guideline
  • Older adults with cognitive impairments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Operation Alert: Support program

Substudy 1:

Testing of a newly developed psycho-education tool will occur across four partner hospitals and participating nonprofit organizations (NGOs). Victims of violence seeking care at these sites will receive immediate support, with the pilot study integrated into standard care practices. The psycho-education toolkit enhances the foundational care already provided. The tool supports healthcare providers in offering psycho-education about e.g. violence and (the effects) of trauma, ...

Substudy 2:

This pilot study evaluates the Operation Alert guidelines within the geriatrics departments of four hospitals. A geriatric assessment is standard care during admission to these departments. The pilot will be embedded into this existing practice to ensure alignment with routine care. Additional questions will be embedded in a geriatric assessment/intake focusing on older adults' well-being, relationships and social network, and potential life events (e.g. experiences of violence).

Substudy 1:

Testing of a newly developed psycho-education tool will occur across four partner hospitals and participating nonprofit organizations (NGOs). Victims of violence seeking care at these sites will receive immediate support, with the pilot study integrated into standard care practices. The psycho-education toolkit enhances the foundational care already provided. The tool supports healthcare providers in offering psycho-education about e.g. violence and (the effects) of trauma, ...

Substudy 2:

This pilot study evaluates the Operation Alert guidelines within the geriatrics departments of four hospitals. A geriatric assessment is standard care during admission to these departments. The pilot will be embedded into this existing practice to ensure alignment with routine care. Additional questions will be embedded in a geriatric assessment/intake focusing on older adults' well-being, relationships and social network, and potential life events (e.g. experiences of violence).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enhanced identification, care, and referral processes for victims of violence.
Time Frame: Conducting the psycho-education tool or guideline will not take more than 30 minutes in total.

Conduct a pilot study to evaluate a recently developed psycho-education tool and guideline for healthcare providers (Operation Alert study). These tools aim to enhance the delivery of psycho-education to victims of violence and improve the identification of and care for older victims of violence. The tools are evaluated through a self-developed questionnaire based on the theoretical framework of acceptability by Sekhon (2022), assessing 7 constructs: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy.

In substudy 1, healthcare providers complete 11 open-ended questions and demographics, while patients answer 9 closed questions (Likert 1-5) and 10 open-ended ones. In substudy 2, healthcare providers piloting the guideline have to complete 6 open questions, 11 closed questions (Likert 1-5), and demographics. There are also 11 open-ended questions with no obligation to complete.

Conducting the psycho-education tool or guideline will not take more than 30 minutes in total.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the psycho-education tool and guideline in clinical practice.
Time Frame: An evaluation is completed after testing the psycho-education tool or guideline and takes approximately 10 minutes.

Targeted adjustments and finalization of the psycho-education tool and guidelines can be made based on the feedback obtained from questionnaires of healthcare providers (substudy 1 and 2) and patients/victims (substudy 1).

The tools are evaluated by using a self-developed questionnaire based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) by Sekhon (2022). The questions comprise seven component constructs: affective attitude, burden, ethicality intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy.

The framework presents a generic TFA questionnaire to evaluate the acceptability of interventions from the perspectives of recipients. It can be adapted to assess acceptability of any healthcare intervention. Its development was guided by theory, previous research, and stakeholder input.

An evaluation is completed after testing the psycho-education tool or guideline and takes approximately 10 minutes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ines Keygnaert, Ph.D, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University (VIORESC)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ONZ-2024-0077
  • PSY/JO/Programma IFG-SG-VGV/20 (Other Grant/Funding Number: FOD Volksgezondheid)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual patient data are anonymized and encrypted to ensure privacy and security. The research specifically addresses violence, with a focus on sexual and domestic violence among participants aged 16 and older. Sharing any individual patient data would breach the confidentiality of this sensitive group and violate European GDPR regulations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Enhance Care to Victims of Violence

Clinical Trials on Operation Alert: Support prgram

Subscribe