Intensive Psychotherapy and Case Management for Karen Refugees in Primary Care

July 22, 2019 updated by: Maria Vukovich, The Center for Victims of Torture, United States

Effects of Intensive Psychotherapy and Case Management for Karen Refugees in Primary Care: A Randomized Control Trial

Patients in the IPCM group (n = 112) received intensive psychotherapy and case management, and those in the CAU group (n = 102) received care as usual, including behavioral health referrals and/or brief onsite interventions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

IPCM patients received routine services from both a psychotherapist and separate mental health case manager for one year; duration of each appointment was 45 minutes - 1 hour; frequency of appointments was weekly or every other week, dependent on participant availability. A face-to-face professional interpreter was utilized unless the CVT provider was a native Karen speaker.

Participants in the control group received care as usual, without CVT involvement other than administration of the outcome measures. Once randomized, CAU patients could be referred to a full range of outpatient and community-based behavioral health services by their primary care physician.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

214

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligibility criteria included Major Depression diagnosis by SCID interview, Karen refugee, ages 18-65.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were current participation in individual psychotherapy or case management, psychosis, or substance use problems on the CAGE-AID.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intensive Psychotherapy Case Management
Treatment group received Intensive Psychotherapy and Case Management (IPCM) delivered by psychotherapists and social worker with expertise in refugee trauma and mental health.
CVT's approach emphasized active interdisciplinary coordination and a relational focus anchored in cultural humilityX to address survivors' priorities, empower survivors as the primary architects of their healing, and work alongside each survivor to co-construct meaning and behavioral change.
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Treatment as Usual group received ongoing care from their primary care providers without the involvement of CVT (except for the collection of outcomes). TAU patients could be referred to a full range of outpatient and community-based behavioral health services by their primary care physician.
CVT's approach emphasized active interdisciplinary coordination and a relational focus anchored in cultural humilityX to address survivors' priorities, empower survivors as the primary architects of their healing, and work alongside each survivor to co-construct meaning and behavioral change.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depression over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Hopkins Symptom Trauma Checklist (HSCL-25) consists of 25 items with 15 items evaluating depression symptoms with response scale scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) indicating the frequency and severity of symptoms. Low scores indicate low symptoms while higher scores indicate greater symptoms of depression.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Anxiety over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Hopkins Symptom Trauma Checklist (HSCL-25) consists of 25 items with 10 items assessing anxiety symptoms with response scale scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) indicating the frequency and severity of symptoms. Low scores indicate low symptoms while higher scores indicate greater symptoms of anxiety.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in PTSD over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PDS-5) consists of 21 items evaluating symptoms of posttraumatic stress with response scale scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) indicating the frequency and severity of symptoms. Low scores indicate low symptoms while higher scores indicate greater symptoms of PTSD.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Pain over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Pain Complaints Scale consists of 5 items assessing general pain symptoms with response scale scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) indicating the frequency and severity of symptoms. Low scores indicate low symptoms while higher scores indicate greater symptoms of pain.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Safety/Basic Needs over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Social Circumstances and Social Functioning Inventory (SCFI-37), consists of 37 items that measure adaptive social functioning in 6 subscales (safety/basic needs, immigration stability, employment, social support, cultural adjustment and community engagement) with response scale scores ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 4 (high functioning). Safety/basic needs measures frequency and quality of basic needs met in housing, clothing, food, and transportation. Subscale scores are calculated as total scores.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Immigration Stability over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Social Circumstances and Social Functioning Inventory (SCFI-37), consists of 37 items that measure adaptive social functioning in 6 subscales (safety/basic needs, immigration stability, employment, social support, cultural adjustment and community engagement) with response scale scores ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 4 (high functioning). Immigration stability measures legal status and stability for work, healthcare and residence in the country and progress towards citizenship. Subscale scores are calculated as total scores.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Employment over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Social Circumstances and Social Functioning Inventory (SCFI-37), consists of 37 items that measure adaptive social functioning in 6 subscales (safety/basic needs, immigration stability, employment, social support, cultural adjustment and community engagement) with response scale scores ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 4 (high functioning). Employment subscale consists of 5 items measuring motivation for, and frequency and quality of employment. Subscale scores are calculated as total scores.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Social Support over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Social Circumstances and Social Functioning Inventory (SCFI-37), consists of 37 items that measure adaptive social functioning in 6 subscales (safety/basic needs, immigration stability, employment, social support, cultural adjustment and community engagement) with response scale scores ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 4 (high functioning). The social support subscale consists of 5 items measuring frequency and quality of social connections in family and friends. Subscale scores are calculated as total scores.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Cultural Adjustment over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Social Circumstances and Social Functioning Inventory (SCFI-37), consists of 37 items that measure adaptive social functioning in 6 subscales (safety/basic needs, immigration stability, employment, social support, cultural adjustment and community engagement) with response scale scores ranging from 0 (lower functioning) to 4 (higher functioning). Cultural Adjustment consists of 5 items measuring adaptation to new cultural and geographic community.

Subscale scores are calculated as total scores.

Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Community Engagement over time
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Social Circumstances and Social Functioning Inventory (SCFI-37), consists of 37 items that measure adaptive social functioning in 6 subscales (safety/basic needs, immigration stability, employment, social support, cultural adjustment and community engagement) with response scale scores ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 4 (high functioning). Community engagement consists of 6 items measuring participation in civic, political, social and educational activities in the geographic community. Subscale scores are calculated as total scores.
Collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1001 (Registro Nacional Estudios Clinicos (RNEC))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delivery of Intensive Behavioral Services to Refugees in Primary Care

Clinical Trials on Intensive Psychotherapy and case management for refugee trauma

Subscribe