Photobiomodulation Therapy Versus Integrated Myofascial Release Therapy Techniques In Patients With COVID-19 With Follow-Up Telerehabilitation (PBM in COVID19)

January 23, 2026 updated by: Sherin Hassan Mohammed Mehani, Beni-Suef University

Photobiomodulation Therapy Versus Integrated Myofascial Release Therapy Techniques In Patients With Moderate COVID 19 Inside Intensive Care Unit, With a Complementary Home Telerehabilitation

Objective: To compare low-level laser therapy and myofascial release in reducing inflammation and functional recovery in critically ill COVID-19 patients with 3-month home-based telerehabilitation assessment.

Participants: One hundred two COVID-19 patients aged 45-60 years randomized into three groups: low-level laser therapy (n=34), myofascial release (n=34), and control (n=34).

Intervention: Intensive care unit-based low-level laser therapy, myofascial release, or standard physiotherapy with medical treatment. Following discharge, all participants received 12 weeks of multidimensional home-based telerehabilitation incorporating patient education, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training, limb strengthening, aerobic training, and trunk control.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes were ferritin and D-dimer levels. Secondary outcomes included C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, white blood cell counts, maximum inspiratory pressure, six-minute walk test, bilateral knee strength, dyspnea perception, fatigue severity, and oxygen saturation. All measured at baseline, discharge, and 3 months. Intensive care unit length of stay and physiotherapy sessions measured at discharge.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One hundred-two COVID 19 patients (56 men and 46 women) aged 45-60 years were recruited from the Al Kasr Al Ainy teaching hospitals ICUs. All patients were informed of the study, risks, and expected benefits before signing the informed consent form. The low-level laser therapy group (LLLT) consisted of 34 patients, who received low-level laser therapy, traditional physiotherapy, medical treatment and the myofascial release group (MR) consisted of 34 patients, who received myofascial release techniques, traditional physiotherapy, and medical treatment; and the control group (C) consisted of 34 patients, who received traditional physiotherapy and medical treatment only. After discharge all patients received home multidimension telerehabilitation program.

The eligibility criteria were as follows: (I) Patients aged from 45 to 60 years old, (II) Diagnosed by CT or PCR as positive COVID 19, (III) Moderate cases of COVID-19 (According to CO-RA DS Scale).22 (IV) on low flow rate oxygen supply Exclusion criteria were (I) patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, (II) Hemodynamically Unstable with inotropic support; (III) Septic Shock; (IV) ICU admission less than 24 h.

(V) physician termination of physiotherapy; and (VI) fever with causes other than chest infection, (VII) severe electrolyte imbalance, acute venous thromboembolism without therapeutic anticoagulation for over 48 h, (VIII) Unstable Atrial fibrillation, or severe tachycardia compared to baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Banī Suwayf, Egypt, 62511
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy , Beni-Suef University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The eligibility criteria were as follows:
  • Patients aged from 45 to 60 years old.
  • Diagnosed by CT or PCR as positive COVID 19.
  • Moderate cases of COVID-19(According to CO-RADS Scale).
  • On low flow rate oxygen supply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
  • Hemodynamically Unstable with inotropic support
  • Septic Shock
  • ICU admission less than 24 h
  • physician termination of physiotherapy;
  • Fever with causes other than chest infection.
  • Severe electrolyte imbalance
  • Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) without therapeutic anticoagulation for over 48 hours,
  • Unstable Atrial fibrillation , or Severe Tachycardia compared to baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Myofascial release therapy
Myofascial release therapy A- Suboccipital release technique B- anterior cervical myofascial release C- Anterior thoracic and sternal myofascial release D- diaphragmatic dome release technique in addition to traditional physical therapy program
technique was applied from supine position, with both hands cupping both diaphragmatic domes
Following ICU discharge, all patients participated in a 12-week structured home multidimensional telerehabilitation program delivered via videoconferencing (Zoom or Microsoft Teams) under the remote supervision of a physiotherapist. Sessions were conducted three times per week and incorporated patient education, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training (30 -50% MIP), strengthening of upper and lower limb muscle groups (50- 70 % 1RM), aerobic training (40- 60% HRR), and trunk control activities. Safety monitoring was emphasized throughout, with patients instructed to use a pulse oximeter before, during, and after each session. Adherence was assessed by session attendance, exercise diaries, and weekly therapist follow-up
Experimental: traditional physical therapy program
included traditional chest physiotherapy (postural drainage, percussion and shaking), stretching exercise for ( strencliedo mastoid ,scalene muscle ,pectorals major and minor ,hamstring and calf muscles )
included traditional chest physiotherapy (postural drainage, percussion and shaking), stretching exercise
Following ICU discharge, all patients participated in a 12-week structured home multidimensional telerehabilitation program delivered via videoconferencing (Zoom or Microsoft Teams) under the remote supervision of a physiotherapist. Sessions were conducted three times per week and incorporated patient education, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training (30 -50% MIP), strengthening of upper and lower limb muscle groups (50- 70 % 1RM), aerobic training (40- 60% HRR), and trunk control activities. Safety monitoring was emphasized throughout, with patients instructed to use a pulse oximeter before, during, and after each session. Adherence was assessed by session attendance, exercise diaries, and weekly therapist follow-up
Experimental: Photobiomodulation therapy
Photobiomodulation therapy :Red laser wavelength (630-660 nm), Average power: 50-100 Mw, Dose: 6-10 J/cm2• Area 2-3 minutes/cm2, Sessions: twice -daily, acupuncture Laser Positions: transcutaneous laser therapy
It was applied for upper respiratory tract over tonsils, trachea, and main bronchi (bilaterally parasternal at the level of angle of Lewis), upper and lower lung, and at cubital vein
Following ICU discharge, all patients participated in a 12-week structured home multidimensional telerehabilitation program delivered via videoconferencing (Zoom or Microsoft Teams) under the remote supervision of a physiotherapist. Sessions were conducted three times per week and incorporated patient education, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training (30 -50% MIP), strengthening of upper and lower limb muscle groups (50- 70 % 1RM), aerobic training (40- 60% HRR), and trunk control activities. Safety monitoring was emphasized throughout, with patients instructed to use a pulse oximeter before, during, and after each session. Adherence was assessed by session attendance, exercise diaries, and weekly therapist follow-up

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lab Investigations
Time Frame: at baseline and at discharge from ICU up to 14 days and at 3 month of discharge
(1) ferritin
at baseline and at discharge from ICU up to 14 days and at 3 month of discharge
lab investigation
Time Frame: at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
2. D-dimer
at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
lab analysis
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
(3) CRP
at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
lab analysis
Time Frame: at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
(4) Interleukin-6
at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
lab analysis
Time Frame: at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
(5) white blood cell counts.
at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Maximum inspiratory pressure
Time Frame: at baseline and at icu discharge upto 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Maximum inspiratory pressure
at baseline and at icu discharge upto 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Six-minute walk test
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) was conducted in the intensive care unit under the supervision
at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Ease of breathing
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
It was assessed using visual analogue scale: Zero represented deep, comfortable breathing; 10 represented inability to breathe deeply. Scores were recorded on a graduated ruler
at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Dyspnea perception
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge, up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
It was assessed during a six-minute walking test: modified Borg scale (0-10) assessed dyspnea: zero = no dyspnea; 10 = maximum dyspnea ever experienced
at baseline and at ICU discharge, up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Percentage of oxygen saturation
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
portable intra-hospital patient monitor measured hemoglobin oxygen saturation in arterial blood.
at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Icu length of stay
Time Frame: at ICU discharge up to 2weeks
at ICU discharge up to 2weeks
fatigue
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
The Fatigue Severity Scale:Nine-item scale with 7-point Likert responses (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree). Total score represents arithmetic mean of item responses.
at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Lower limbs strength
Time Frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge upto 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Quadriceps strength
at baseline and at ICU discharge upto 14 days and at 3 months of discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mahmoud Ibrahim Mahmoud, Lecturer, Faculty of Physical Therapy - Beni-Suef University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD could be shared in the form of study protocol , full details about study procedure and summary about the results . The sharing is available through the study principal investigator ; Prof. Sherin Mehani for about 12 months after publishing the paper.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The sharing is available through the study principal investigator ; Prof. Sherin Mehani for about 12 months after publishing the paper.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All of the interested readers could access the needed IPD and supportive information upon request through E- mail sherinhassin@yahoo.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID 19 Disease

Clinical Trials on Myofascial release therapy

Subscribe