Bariatric Surgery vs. Semaglutide vs. Tirzepatide

August 28, 2026 updated by: Ali Aminian

Efficacy and Safety of Bariatric Surgery, Semaglutide Once Weekly, and Tirzepatide Once Weekly in Patients With Obesity

The recent introduction of the new generation of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) will change the future of obesity treatment. These highly effective medications, such as high-dose semaglutide and tirzepatide, are hormone analogues that augment the incretin function and exert multiple physiological effects by activating glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and/or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) distributed in various organs. These medications provide an average of 15-22% weight reduction in one-year trials, which had not been seen in the past with medical therapy. While the literature suggests that bariatric surgery is superior to these new highly effective medications, there is no head-to-head comparison between the most common bariatric operations (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] and sleeve gastrectomy [SG]) with semaglutide (once weekly) and tirzepatide (once weekly). The goal of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to compare these effective therapies in patients with severe obesity to provide the best evidence to inform clinical decisions in treating patients with obesity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, non-blinded, controlled efficacy/safety study with 3 parallel groups who will either receive bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG), semaglutide, or tirzepatide. The study has 2 phases: the first 12 months for the assessment of the primary endpoint ( mean percentage weight loss) and the second 12 months as the extension phase of the study to mimic the real-life setting. Findings at the end of each phase will be separately reported. A randomized trial of adult patients with a BMI of 35-65 kg/m2 who seek treatment for obesity at Cleveland Clinic will be performed. Patients who meet the ASMBS/IFSO 2022 guidelines for bariatric surgery will be invited for possible enrollment. Interested and eligible patients will be randomized to receive their already chosen bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG), tirzepatide. or semaglutide in 2:2:1 ratio. The study targets approximately 140 participants who initiate their assigned treatment for the primary efficacy analysis.

The study is not intended to compare RYGB vs SG head-to-head. RYGB and SG constitute one group as a bariatric surgery group. The assignment of RYGB or SG is not based on a randomized design. Each patient and surgical team will make a shared decision about the most appropriate surgical procedure. The study is also not intended to compare semaglutide vs tirzepatide head-to-head.

In the second or extension phase of the study, participants are followed from month 12 to month 24, regardless of the treatment that they receive. In this phase, the study medications (semaglutide and tirzepatide) will not be provided by the study. The goal of this phase is to provide valuable insights into A) access to AOMs and the durability of effects in the real-life setting, B) cross-over from AOMs to bariatric surgery, and C) adjuvant pharmacotherapy after bariatric surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • The Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Entry into the study would require that the patient:

  1. Is a candidate for general anesthesia
  2. Is eligible for bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG) based on ASMBS/IFSO 2022 guidelines
  3. Is ≥18 and ≤70 years old (both inclusive)
  4. has a BMI ≥35 and ≤65 kg/m2 (both inclusive)
  5. Patients with and without T2DM are eligible for the study. Patients with T2DM should have been on a stable dose of anti-diabetic medication (including insulin but not semaglutide or tirzepatide) for at least 3 months prior to entry, with HbA1c ≤12%.
  6. No weight loss > 20 lbs. in 3 months before screening (self-reported)
  7. Has the ability and willingness to participate in the study, provide informed consent, and agree to any of the arms involved in the study.
  8. Is able to understand the options and to comply with the requirements of each arm.
  9. Has a negative urine pregnancy test at randomization visit for women of childbearing potential.
  10. Women of childbearing age must agree to use reliable method of contraception for 2 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant cardiac or atherosclerotic disease (planned to undergo cardiac, coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery revascularization procedures in the next 12 months)
  2. Severe uncompensated cardiopulmonary disease leading to American Society of Anesthesiologists Class IV or V
  3. Classified as New York Heart Association Class IV
  4. Left ventricular ejection fraction <25% at the time of screening (if already known)
  5. Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart surgery, coronary stent placement in the past 6 months
  6. Prior bariatric surgery of any kind

    • Intragastric balloon that has been removed at least 6 months prior to the first study visit is allowed.

  7. History of solid organ transplant
  8. Type 1 diabetes or autoimmune diabetes
  9. eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or being on dialysis
  10. History of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or venous thromboembolism
  11. On therapeutic dose of anticoagulants such as warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
  12. Decompensated cirrhosis characterized by presence of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension, or esophageal varices.
  13. History of severe anemia defined as hemoglobin less than 8 g/dL
  14. Use of investigational therapy
  15. Liver transaminase level or alkaline phosphatase >200 U/L
  16. Significant alcohol use (average >2 drinks/day)
  17. Presence of active malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer)
  18. Life expectancy less than 3 years due to concomitant diseases
  19. Major mental health, psychological disorders, or substance abuse disorders that in the opinion of the investigators could disqualify the patient from bariatric surgery
  20. Any condition or major illness that, in the investigator's judgment, places the subject at undue risk by participating in the study
  21. Unable to understand the risks, benefits and compliance requirements of study
  22. Lack capacity to give informed consent
  23. Plans to move outside the primary location of study (northeast Ohio) within the next 12 months
  24. Pregnant, breast-feeding or the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive measures
  25. Hypothalamic obesity
  26. Continuous treatment with semaglutide (once weekly) or tirzepatide (once weekly) <60 days before screening
  27. History of semaglutide (once weekly) or tirzepatide (once weekly) use in the past for obesity with lack of clinical response
  28. Chronic use of systemic steroids
  29. Uncontrolled thyroid disease: thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) > 6.0 mIU/L or < 0.1 mIU/L

    • Note: Patients receiving treatment for hypothyroidism can be included if their thyroid hormone replacement dose has been stable for at least 3 months.

  30. Acute pancreatitis < 180 days before screening
  31. History or presence of chronic pancreatitis
  32. History of Crohn's disease
  33. Known or suspected allergy to semaglutide, tirzepatide, excipients, or related products
  34. A personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2)
  35. Previous participation in this trial and got randomized to one of the study groups but did not proceed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bariatric Surgery
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG)
Patients receive either RYGB or SG. The surgical risk, the differential impact of each procedure on body weight and other obesity-related diseases, presence of other medical and mental problems, patient's behavioral factors (e.g., postoperative compliance, active smoking), medications, and goals will be considered when the patient and local medical team make a shared decision about the most appropriate surgical procedure.
Other Names:
  • Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)
  • Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG)
  • Metabolic Surgery
Active Comparator: Semaglutide
Semaglutide, which is an incretin-based medication that has been approved for the treatment of obesity, will be used for this arm.

Semaglutide will be initiated at a dose of 0.25 mg once weekly and will be increased during the dose-escalation period to reach a maintenance dose of up to 2.4 mg once weekly by week 16. If patients do not tolerate a dose during dose escalation, we will consider delaying dose escalation until next visit (for 4 weeks). Dosing for Semaglutide is the FDA-approved dosing schedule.

The maintenance dose is 2.4 mg injected subcutaneously once-weekly. The protocol allows for dose reductions in case a participant does not tolerate the recommended target dose of 2.4 mg and may stay at the lower maintenance dose level (e.g., 1.7 mg once weekly), if needed.

Other Names:
  • Ozempic
  • Wegovy
Active Comparator: Tirzepatide
Tirzepatide, which is an incretin-based medication that has been approved for the treatment of obesity, will be used for this arm.

Tirzepatide will be initiated at a dose of 2.5 mg once weekly and will be increased by 2.5 mg every four weeks during the dose-escalation period to reach a maintenance dose of up to 15 mg once weekly by week 20. If patients do not tolerate a dose during dose escalation, we will consider delaying dose escalation until next visit (for 4 weeks). Dosing for Tirzepatide is the FDA-approved dosing schedule.

The maintenance dose is 15 mg injected subcutaneously once-weekly. The protocol allows for dose reductions in case a participant does not tolerate the recommended target dose of 15 mg and may stay at the lower maintenance dose level (e.g., 10 mg once weekly), if needed.

Other Names:
  • Mounjaro
  • Zepbound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean percentage total body weight loss at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 after treatment initiation

The mean percentage weight loss at 52 weeks after treatment initiation for the following 2 comparisons:

  • Bariatric surgery (RYGB and SG) vs tirzepatide
  • Bariatric surgery (RYGB and SG) vs semaglutide
Baseline to Week 52 after treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving Weight Loss Milestones (Body weight related end points)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20%, ≥25%, ≥30%, and ≥35% weight loss from baseline
Baseline to Week 52
Absolute Change in Weight (Body weight related end points)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mean absolute change in weight measured in kilograms from baseline to 52 weeks
Baseline to Week 52
Absolute Change in BMI (Body weight related end points)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Absolute change in BMI measured in kg/m^2 from baseline to 52 weeks
Baseline to Week 52
Excess Weight Loss Percentage (Body weight related end points)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of excess weight loss, calculated by dividing the difference between initial BMI and final BMI by the difference between initial BMI and a target BMI of 25
Baseline to Week 52
Change in Waist Circumference (Body weight related end points)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in waist circumferential measurement above the level of the iliac crests measured in centimeters from baseline to 52 weeks
Baseline to Week 52
Change in waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in waist-to-height ratio from baseline to Week 52
Baseline to Week 52
Systolic blood pressure trends
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mean and change in systolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
Baseline to Week 52
Mean and change from baseline in lipid panel
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mean and change from baseline in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides measured in mg/dL
Baseline to Week 52
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers in T2DM patients
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mean and change from baseline in blood glucose (measured in mg/dL) and HbA1c (as a percentage) in patients with T2DM
Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of patients with T2DM meeting predefined HbA1c targets
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52

Percentage of patients meeting different HbA1c targets, for example:

  • HbA1c <6.5% (without diabetes medications)
  • HbA1c <7% (irrespective of taking diabetes medications or not)
Baseline to Week 52
Changes in inflammatory marker, CRP
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mean and change from baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measured in mg/L
Baseline to Week 52
Changes in Lipoprotein(a)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mean and change from baseline in Lipoprotein(a) measured in mg/dL
Baseline to Week 52
Change in cardiovascular and diabetes medications
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in the number of cardiovascular and diabetes medications prescribed
Baseline to Week 52
Change from baseline in quality of life metrics
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change from baseline in score of The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (physical and mental components). Each item is given a score ranging from 0-100. Lower scores indicating poor outcomes. Final score is an average of all the items that were answered. Unanswered questions are not included in the final average. Research coordinator completes the survey with the patient.
Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change in body composition (via Seca mBCA 554 Bioimpedance Analysis)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change in body composition (% fat mass and % fat-free mass) as measured by Seca mBCA 554 Bioimpedance Analysis to assess whether that weight loss is primarily caused by reduction in fat mass or not.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Mean change in liver fat content (via MRI-PDFF)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Mean change from baseline in liver fat content as assessed by MRI-PDFF measured as a percentage
Baseline to Weeks 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥5%, ≥30%, ≥50% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (via MRI-PDFF)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Percentage of participants achieving at least 5%, 30%, or 50% relative reduction in liver fat content from baseline
Baseline to Weeks 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving MRI-PDFF Normalization (via MRI-PDFF)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Percentage of participants achieving MRI-PDFF normalization, defined as a liver fat content of <5%, at week 52
Baseline to Weeks 52

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in body weight (second phase of the study)
Time Frame: from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Change in body weight in percentage during the extension phase of the trial mimicking what can happen in the real-life setting
from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Anti-obesity medication after bariatric surgery (second phase of the study)
Time Frame: from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Percentage of patients receiving anti-obesity medications after bariatric surgery
from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Change in body weight in patients receiving combination therapy (second phase of the study)
Time Frame: from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Change in body weight in percentage during the extension phase of the trial in the patients who receive both bariatric surgery and anti-obesity medications
from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Safety end points
Time Frame: Throughout the study, 104 weeks
Complications related to obesity, bariatric surgery, as well as adverse events of semaglutide and tirzepatide in the trial will be recorded and evaluated.
Throughout the study, 104 weeks
Cardiac ejection fraction (via cardiac MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Ejection fraction of the heart evaluated via cardiac MRI measured in percentage
Baseline to Weeks 52
Left ventricular mass (via cardiac MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Left ventricular mass, evaluated via cardiac MRI measured in grams
Baseline to Weeks 52
Pericardial fat fraction (via cardiac MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
fat fraction of the pericardium via cardiac MRI measured in percentage
Baseline to Weeks 52
Crossing over to bariatric surgery (second phase of the study)
Time Frame: from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Percentage of patients cross-over from nonsurgical arm to bariatric surgery
from week 52 to week 104 of the study
Predicted cardiovascular disease risk
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Framingham 30-year general and hard CVD risk; supportive 10-year general CVD risk
Baseline to Week 52
Metabolic syndrome remission and components
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Prevalence, remission, development, number of components, and individual components
Baseline to Week 52
Time to clinically meaningful weight-loss milestones
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52
Time to first achievement of ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20%, ≥25%, ≥30%, and ≥35% total body-weight loss
Baseline to Weeks 52
Time to weight plateau
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104

Time from treatment initiation to weight plateau, defined according to prespecified criteria based on longitudinal body-weight measurements.

Unit of Measure: Weeks

Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Rate of weight loss
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104

Rate of percentage total body weight loss over time following treatment initiation, estimated from longitudinal body-weight measurements.

Unit of Measure: Percentage points per week

Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change in glycemic status among participants without type 2 diabetes
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104

Participants will be categorized as having normoglycemia, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes using prespecified diagnostic criteria based on HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose. Analyses will evaluate transitions in glycemic status from baseline to Weeks 52 and 104, including regression from prediabetes to normoglycemia and development of type 2 diabetes.

Unit of Measure: Number of participants

Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change in depressive symptoms measured by PHQ-8
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104

Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) score from the initial psychological assessment to Weeks 52 and 104. PHQ-8 scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms.

Unit of Measure: PHQ-8 score

Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change in anxiety symptoms measured by GAD-7
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104

Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score from the initial psychological assessment to Weeks 52 and 104. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms.

Unit of Measure: GAD-7 score

Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change in binge-eating symptoms measured by the Binge Eating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104

Change in Binge Eating Scale (BES) score from the initial psychological assessment to Weeks 52 and 104. Higher BES scores indicate greater severity of binge-eating symptoms.

Unit of Measure: BES score

Baseline to Weeks 52 and 104
Change in hemoglobin concentration
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) from baseline to Week 52 to assess development or improvement of anemia.
Baseline to Week 52
Change in serum ferritin
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in serum ferritin (ng/mL) from baseline to Week 52 as a marker of iron stores.
Baseline to Week 52
Change in vitamin B12 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in serum vitamin B12 concentration (pg/mL) from baseline to Week 52.
Baseline to Week 52
Change in vitamin D concentration
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (ng/mL) from baseline to Week 52.
Baseline to Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Aminian, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Ali Aminian, The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe