Improving Diagnostics and Care After First Seizure (EPI-NY)

February 5, 2025 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

EPI-NY: Improving Diagnostics and Care After First Seizure

A first epileptic seizure is a distressing experience, often leading to a complicated and discouraging journey before an epilepsy diagnosis is confirmed. Early diagnostics can help alleviate this uncertainty. It is important to note that seizure mimics and suspected epilepsy are more frequently encountered than an actual first diagnosis of epilepsy or an epileptic seizure. Conversely, delays in diagnosing epilepsy are also common. The current evidence base on first events that may be epileptic remains limited.

First seizure clinics, which provide specialized care for these cases, are becoming more common globally, but none have yet been established in Norway. There is a pressing need to assess the prevalence of first-seizure-like events in Bergen and the surrounding areas, as well as to investigate the clinical trajectory before and after an epilepsy diagnosis. EEG is the cornerstone of diagnostic testing for epilepsy after first seizure, and recent advancements have introduced artificial intelligence to enhance the accuracy of EEG-based epilepsy identification.

The investigators will identify in one year around 200 hospital-handled patients who had had an episode that may be epileptic. Patient will be followed up over two years, with data abstracted from the medical record regarding seizure diagnosis, new events, new brain-related diagnoses and complications. Data will also be gathered from government databases in primary and secondary care regarding complications from seizure, new brain-related diagnoses, new brain-related medications, sickness absence and income. For children, school absence days will be collected.

The investigators will identify the incidence of first seizure and new-onset epilepsy, and and which care pathways most patients with suspected first seizure go through. The investigators will study the role of early EEG to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, and compare conventional EEG interpretation with AI-assisted interpretation for diagnostic precision. The investigators will study the trajectory of anxiety, quality of life and complications with record linkage for epilepsy-relevant outcomes. A broad scope of complications will be studied, including job or school absence, driving license status, injuries in primary or secondary care, and new brain-related diagnoses. This study will gather important data to gauge potential gaps and improvements in care in early epilepsy, of relevance to patients in Bergen, Norway and the developed part of the world.

Particulary novel aspects are an evaluation of the SCORE AI model for EEG analysis, and linking to a spectrum of government databases on work participation, primary care and specialty care on complications of first seizure and/or early epilepsy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • Recruiting
        • Haukeland University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Jan Brogger, MD PhD
          • Phone Number: 4755975058
        • Contact:
          • Jan Brogger, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

First epileptic seizure, or multiple previous seizures not evaluated by a neurologist or child neurologist

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has experienced events with a substantial suspicion of being an epileptic seizure. One of:

    • The patient has experienced one or more first-in-life events with a substantial suspicion of being an epileptic seizure, including febrile seizures, and these episodes have previously not been evaluated by a neurologist or pediatrician OR
    • The patient has experienced the recurrence of events with a substantial suspicion of being an epileptic seizure, that have previously been evaluated by a neurologist or pediatrician to not be epileptic, and this merits a new evaluation.
    • OR: The patient does not fulfill the criteria above, but has been investigated for episodes or complaints, which after evaluation have been shown to be first-in-life epileptic seizures.

OR

-The patient has experienced the recurrence of events with a substantial suspicion of being an epileptic seizure, that have previously been evaluated by a neurologist or pediatrician to not be epileptic, and this merits a new evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous known clinical diagnosis of epilepsy given by a neurologist or pediatrician, and not subsequently retracted.
  • Person or caregivers able to give informed consent.
  • Adequate Norwegian language skills to be able to fill out questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
First epileptic seizure
The patient has experienced one or more first-in-life events with a substantial suspicion of being an epileptic seizure, excluding febrile seizures, and these episodes have previously not been evaluated by a neurologist or pediatrician
New evaluation of possible seizures previously thought to be non-epileptic
The patient has experienced the recurrence of events with a substantial suspicion of being an epileptic seizure, that have previously been evaluated by a neurologist or pediatrician to not be epileptic, and this merits a new evaluation.
New epilepsy diagnosis in the study period not otherwise included
The patient does not fulfill the criteria for the two other groups, but has been investigated for episodes or complaints, which after evaluation have been shown to be first-in-life epileptic seizures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of first seizure and new-onset epilepsy
Time Frame: 2 years
Based on the final two year status, or last-status carried forward, the incidence of first seizures and new-onset epilepsy will be calculated for adults and children.
2 years
Percent diagnostic EEG
Time Frame: 2 years
The diagnostic yield of early vs late yield will be categorized as routine-EEG within 24 hours, or LTM-EEG within 1 week or later. The diagnostic yield will be computed as the percentage of patients with interictal epileptiform discharges or seizure during EEG for each category and time frame for EEG, and the same for final epilepsy diagnosis
2 years
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of human vs human-AI-assisted EEG analysis to predict future epilepsy
Time Frame: 2 years
We will compare the results of the current clinical standard of care, which is human expert EEG interpretation, with expert-assisted AI analysis using the SCORE AI model EEG software . We will compute sensitivity, specificity, accuracy for both diagnostic pipelines applied to all EEG to predict a future epilepsy diagnosis taken from medical records, as well as subtype of epilepsy (focal, idiopathic, unknown).
2 years
Seizure control in new-onset epilepsy
Time Frame: 2 years
Among patients with new-onset epilepsy, the percentage suffering no new epileptic seizures will be measured.
2 years
Seizure-related trauma
Time Frame: 2 years
Among patients with new-onset epilepsy, what percentage suffer from seizure-related trauma in the first and subsequent eventscompared to patients with first epileptic seizure without new-onset epilepsy and compared to patients with other event diagnosis in the same time period
2 years
Loss of driving license
Time Frame: 2 years
Among patients with new-onset epilepsy, what percentage suffer from loss of driving license compared to patients with first epileptic seizure without new-onset epilepsy and compared to patients with other event diagnosis in the same time period
2 years
Loss of labor market participation
Time Frame: 2 years
Among patients with new-onset epilepsy, what percentage suffer from loss of labor market participation compared to patients with first epileptic seizure without new-onset epilepsy and compared to patients with other event diagnosis in the same time period
2 years
New-onset psychiatric diagnoses
Time Frame: 2 years
Among patients with first seizure, and new-onset epilepsy, what percentage suffer from new-onset psychiatric diagnoses compared to patients with first epileptic seizure without new-onset epilepsy and compared to patients with other event diagnosis in the same time period
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to review EEG
Time Frame: 2 years
The time to review EEG will also be compared between expert vs expert-AI-assisted EEG analysis
2 years
QOLIE31
Time Frame: 2 years
Adults will be followed longitudinally with self-reported measures of quality of life (QOLIE31)
2 years
GAD7
Time Frame: 2 years
Adults will be followed longitudinally with self-reported anxiety (GAD7)
2 years
Brief COPE
Time Frame: 2 years
Adults will be followed longitudinally with self-reported coping (Brief COPE)
2 years
Kindl
Time Frame: 2 years
Children will be followed longitudinally with parent-reported quality of life (Kindl)
2 years
Mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
Among patients with first seizure, and new-onset epilepsy, what percentage suffer from mortality compared to patients with first epileptic seizure without new-onset epilepsy and compared to patients with other event diagnosis in the same time period
2 years
School absence days
Time Frame: 2 years
Among children with new-onset epilepsy, what percentage suffer from increased school absence days compared to children with first epileptic seizure without new-onset epilepsy and compared to children with other event diagnosis in the same time period
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Brogger, MD PhD, Helse-Bergen HF

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 24, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 24, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

GDPR makes this very difficult

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on First Suspected Epileptic Seizure

Subscribe