Comparison of the User Experience of Four Nasal Aspirators in Infants

March 27, 2026 updated by: Valerie Cote, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Nasal Aspirators in Infants

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the caregiver's user experience, and overall impacts on an infant's cold symptoms between four nasal aspirator devices. These devices are normally used to relieve congestion in infants. when they are sick by softening and suctioning mucus from the nose.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

What is the caregiver's user experience of the NozeBot electric nasal aspirator compared to three commonly accessible nasal aspirator devices?

Are there changes in the infant's sleeping, feeding, or breathing as reported by the caregiver when using the NozeBot compared to the three other nasal aspirator devices?

Are there changes in their caregiver's habits when using the NozeBot compared to the three other nasal aspirator devices?

Researchers will compare the self-reported measures of caregiver's user experience, reported changes to their infant's symptoms, and reported changes to their own sleeping and care habits between the NozeBot electric nasal aspirator and three comparator devices: the NoseFrida SnotSucker, the hydraSense Baby Nasal Aspirator Kit, and the Braun electric nasal aspirator.

Participants will be assigned to receive one of the four devices at the start of their participation. They will be asked to use the assigned device at home according to the device instructions during two periods: (1) for 10 days while their infant is sick, and (2) for up to 3 months after.

During these periods, participants will be asked to complete online surveys at predetermined intervals to report the user experience, any changes to their infant's sleeping, feeding or breathing, and any changes to their own sleeping habits and perceived stress levels. These intervals for survey completion are: (i) after 1-2 days of use while their infant is sick, (ii) after 4-5 days of use while their infant is sick, (iii) after 7-10 days of use while their infant is sick, and then (iv) biweekly for 3 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L1
        • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria

A parent(s)/caregiver(s)/family will be eligible to participate if:

  • They have a child between 2 months - 18 months of age
  • They are seeking outpatient care for that child for a respiratory illness (cold, flu, RSV) at the Kids Come First Care clinic
  • The child does not have any contraindications to the use of a nasal aspirator
  • The parent(s)/caregiver(s) are fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria

A parent(s)/caregiver(s)/family will be ineligible to participate if:

  • They have a child younger than 2 months or 13 months old or older currently seeking outpatient care for a respiratory illness
  • The child is admitted to hospital
  • The child does not have a respiratory illness
  • The child has a diagnosed craniofacial syndrome
  • The child has a defined contraindication and cannot use a nasal aspirator
  • The parents/caregivers are not comfortable using a nasal aspirator
  • The parent/caregivers are not fluent in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NozeBot Arm
Participants assigned to this group will receive the NozeBot electric nasal aspirator device.
The NozeBot is a rechargeable, battery-operated baby nasal aspirator with a nosepiece that loops directly onto the caregivers fingers for ease of use, and is intended to be held so it sits just inside the nose to create a seal. It will be used according to its manufacturer's instructions for use in this study.
Active Comparator: NoseFrida Arm
Participants assigned to this group will receive NoseFrida the SnotSucker product.
The NoseFrida is nose-to-mouth nasal suctioning device with a disposable hygienic filter. The nosepiece is a larger tube that is to be held so it sits against and not inside the nose to create a seal. It will be used according to its manufacturer's instructions for use in this study.
Active Comparator: hydraSense Arm
Participants assigned to this group will receive the hydraSense Baby Nasal Aspirator Starter Kit.
The hydraSense Baby Nasal Aspirator Starter Kit is a nose-to-mouth nasal suctioning device with a disposable hygienic filter. The kit contains pre-proportioned saline solution vials to liquify mucus prior to suctioning. The nosepiece is intended to be held so it sits inside the nose to create a seal. It will be used according to its manufacturer's instructions for use in this study.
Active Comparator: Braun Arm
Participants assigned to this group will receive the Braun nasal aspirator device.
The Braun nasal aspirator is a battery-operated nasal suctioning device with a washable collection chamber for mucus. There are two nosepiece sizes to accommodate a best fit in the nose. It will be used according to its manufacturer's instructions for use in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in the caregiver's user experience on device ease of use between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
The first measure of user experience is the self-reported rating by the caregivers on the ease of use of the device, including device set up, use, and cleaning after use. This is reported on a 5-point Likert scale (1 - difficult to 5 - easy) at each of the survey follow ups.
This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
Differences in the caregiver's satisfaction between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at the 7-10 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant.
The second measure of user experience is the caregiver-reported satisfaction with the device, including confidence that the device is helping their infant, and that the device's power is sufficiently removing mucus. This is reported on a 5-point Likert scale (1 - very dissatisfied to 5 - very satisfied) once at the 7-10 days of use while their child is sick, and at each bi-weekly survey over the 3 months.
This is reported at the 7-10 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant.
Differences in the caregiver's reported net promoter score between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at the 7-10 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant.
The third measure of user experience is the a rating by the caregiver on whether they would recommend the device to someone when their child is sick (also known as Net Promoter Score). This is reported on a 5-point Likert scale (1 - very unlikely to 5 - very likely) once at the 7-10 days of use while their chlid is sick, and at each bi-weekly survey over the 3 months.
This is reported at the 7-10 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported changes in the caregiver's sleep habits between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
Recorded as self-reported perceived changes to the caregivers' sleeping habits during the time that their child is sick since they started using the device in the study. This is reported on a 5-point Likert scale (1 - much less than normal to 5 - a lot more than normal) at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
This is reported at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
Self-reported changes in the caregiver's perceived ability to care for their sick child between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
Recorded as self-reported perceived changes to the caregivers' ability to take care of their child during the time that their child is sick since they started using the device in the study. This is reported on a 5-point Likert scale (1- much less able to 5 - a lot more capable) at each of the survey follow ups.
This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
Self-reported changes in the caregiver's perceived stress levels while caring for a sick child between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
Recorded as self-reported perceived changes to the caregivers' stress levels experienced while their child is sick since they started using the device in the study. This is reported on a 5-point Likert scale (1- strongly disagree to 5 - strongly agree) at each of the survey follow ups.
This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
Caregiver-reported changes in their infant's sleeping habits between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
Reported as caregiver-rated perceived changes in their infant's sleeping habits since they started using the device in the study on a 7-point Likert scale (1 - sleeping much worse to 4 - no changes in sleep to 7 - sleeping much better).
This is reported at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
Caregiver-reported changes in their infant's feeding habits between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
Reported as caregiver-rated perceived changes in their infant's feeding habits since they started using the device in the study on a 7-point Likert scale (1 - much harder to feed to 4 - no changes to feeding to 7 - much easier to feed).
This is reported at the 1-2 days of use, 4-5 days of use, and 7-10 days of use follow up surveys.
Caregiver-reported perceived changes in their infant's breathing between the NozeBot and the NoseFrida, hydraSense and Braun devices
Time Frame: This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant
Reported as caregiver-rated perceived changes in their infant's breathing since they started using the device in the study on a 4-point Likert scale (1 - no change in breathing to 4 - breathing a lot better).
This is reported at all follow ups, from the first survey completed at 1-2 days of device use to the final survey completed at the end of the third month of use per participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHEO REB# 25/07X

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data collected for this research may be used in future related research projects that are either an extension of the original project or in the same general area of research (secondary use of data). Researchers outside of this specific study may request access to the coded database for new research purposes with a specific study plan and agreement to use the coded data only for that research. Participants will not be asked to provide additional informed consent for the use of their coded data for future research. As this study is being conducted to compare the user experience of the NozeBot to three competitor devices, future data sharing requests will be reviewed and allowed in collaboration with Dr. Noze Best.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers and research teams with a study plan can request access to the coded IPD and supporting information. An agreement to use the data only in accordance with the study plan will be put in place to allow electronic access.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Respiratory Tract Infection

Clinical Trials on NozeBot Electric Nasal Aspirator

Subscribe