The INTEGRATE Study: Integrated Pharmacogenetics, TDM and Active Pharmacovigilance as Innovative Tools for the Optimisation and Appropriateness of Drug Therapy (INTEGRATE)

Pharmacogenetics, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) and Active Pharmacovigilance as Innovative Tools Aimed at the Optimisation/ Appropriateness of Drug Therapy and the Minimisation of the Risks of ADRs in Clinical Practice: a Multidisciplinary Approach Exportable at National Level

The primary goal of this observational study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary approach based on pharmacogenetics, TDM (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring) and MedReview into the clinical practice in order to optimize the appropriateness of drugs prescription and to minimise the risk of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in adult cancer patients and in pediatric patients affected by chronic inflammatory diseases. This approach of active pharmacovigilance will also allow a better definition of the causality assessment of ADRs through the direct implementation of data quality in the reporting forms. The study may therefore constitute an example of an approach for both the prevention of ADRs and the optimization of drug use, and for the integration of pharmacogenetics, TDM, and the MedReview data into the National Pharmacovigilance Reports for an improved and innovative evaluation of adverse events, aiming at the implementation of this approach in the regional context.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Primary aim of the study:

To implement the use of pharmacogenetics, TDM, and MedReview at the regional level supporting their utility through an observational approach to assess the effects of these innovative methods, already active in IRCCS, for the optimization of appropriate drug use and minimization of ADR risk in adult and pediatric oncology patients, as well as pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. Specifically, the aim is to evaluate the incidence of ADRs in patients treated based on pharmacogenetics, TDM, and MedReview compared to historical cases treated according to the standard of care before the implementation of the proposed innovative methodologies.

Secondary aims of the study:

  1. To evaluate the "Causality Assessment" between ADR and drug based on the enhanced data quality deriving from the integration of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview into the Pharmacovigilance report.
  2. To propose the systematic integration of the results related to pharmacogenetics, TDM, and MedReview within the existing fields of the current ADR reporting form. This aims to develop a proposal for updating AIFA procedures related to the inclusion of this type of evidence-based information in the National Pharmacovigilance Network (RNF), with a potential update of the reporting form.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pordenone
      • Aviano, Pordenone, Italy, 33081
        • Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)
    • Trieste
      • Trieste, Trieste, Italy, 34137
        • IRCCS materno infantile Burlo Garofolo di Trieste

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are candidates for therapy with: Abemaciclib, Palbociclib, Ribociclib, Letrozole, Tamoxifen, Olaparib, Infliximab, Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Irinotecan, Capecitabine, 5-Fluorouracil, Noraparib, Adalimumab, Imatinib, Regorafenib, Lenvatinib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Rucaparib, 6-MP/ Azathioprine

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who are candidates for therapy with:

  • Abemaciclib,
  • Palbociclib,
  • Ribociclib,
  • Letrozole,
  • Tamoxifen,
  • Olaparib,
  • Niraparib,
  • Rucaparib,
  • Imatinib,
  • Sunitinib,
  • Sorafenib,
  • Regorafenib,
  • Lenvatinib,
  • Irinotecan,
  • Capecitabine,
  • 5-Fluorouracil,
  • Infliximab,
  • Cyclophosphamide,
  • Methotrexate,
  • Adalimumab,
  • 6-Mercaptopurine/Azathioprine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adult patients
Adult cancer patients
Patients will undergo pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview analyses according to the study protocol
Pediatric patients
Pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory diseases
Patients will undergo pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview analyses according to the study protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients treated with study drugs tested with pharmacogenetic and TDM analysis
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Percentage of patients treated with study drugs tested with pharmacogenetic and TDM analysis on total patients treated
Up to 2 years
MedReview reports
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Number of MedReview reports
Up to 2 years
ADRs in patients treated on the basis of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Incidence of ADRs in the study cohorts
Up to 2 years
Comparison of ADRs in patients treated on the basis of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview and retrospective data
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Difference in incidence of ADRs in the prospective cohort will be tested against historical data with binomial test
Up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proposal for updating the pharmacovigilance reporting forms including Pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview information in the National Network of Pharmacovigilance
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Frequencies of new reports sent to the National Pharmacovigilance Network, including pharmacogenetics, TDM, and drug interaction data
Up to 2 years
Costs of ADRs management
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Median and interquartile range of costs
Up to 2 years
Concordance between plasmatic concentration measured with conventional methods and with new methods such as Dried Blood Spot (DBS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Lin's correlation coefficient between plasmatic concentration and DBS estimation
Up to 2 years
Correlation between pharmacogenetic profile and drug exposure (TDM)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Difference in drug exposure measured as Cmin for different pharmacogenetic profiles
Up to 2 years
Correlation between ADRs, TDM and pharmacogenetics analyses
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Frequencies of ADRs in different subgroups of patients defined by TDM and pharmacogenetic profiles
Up to 2 years
Correlation between ADRs, TDM and pharmacogenetics analyses
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Frequencies of severe ADRs in different subgroups of patients defined by TDM and pharmacogenetic profiles
Up to 2 years
Integration of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview information in the existing tool for the evaluation of "Causality assessment" between ADR and specific drug
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Change of Causality Assessment. The change is evaluated as the number of "definite" and "probable" associations between ADRs and suspected drugs compared with historical data
Up to 2 years
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 v3
Time Frame: Up to 2 years

The EORTC QLG Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients.

The possible answers to the questionnaire range from a minimum value ("not at all") to a maximum value ("very much"). Higher values indicate a worse quality of life.

Mean and standard deviation of scores at EORTC QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire will be evaluated.

Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erika Cecchin, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) - IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

Clinical Trials on Pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview

Subscribe