Clinical and Radiographic Success Following Regenerative Pulpotomy Using Chitosan Hydrogel Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin in Mature Mandibular Molars

February 13, 2025 updated by: Perihan Adel Abdel Aziz Wafi, Cairo University

Clinical and Radiographic Success Following Regenerative Pulpotomy Using Chitosan Hydrogel Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin in Mature Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographic success and postoperative pain in mature mandibular molars following vital pulp therapy using chitosan hydrogel versus platelet rich fibrin.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from Symptomatic pulpitis in mature mandibular molars only will be involved.
  • Tooth should give positive response to cold test
  • Haemostasis should be achieved after full pulpotomy
  • The tooth is restorable and free from advanced periodontal disease, cracks and splits.
  • Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing and predictable outcome.
  • Patients who will agree to the consent and will commit to follow-up period.
  • Patients with mature root apices
  • Patients with no internal or external resorption and no periapical lesions
  • Soft tissues around the tooth are normal with no swelling or sinus tract

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with immature roots.
  • Haemostasias after 10 minutes cannot be controlled after full pulpotomy Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
  • Patients with periapical lesions or infections.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Patients who could/would not participate in a 6 months follow-up.
  • Patients with fistula or swelling
  • Patients with necrotic pulp.
  • Patients with old age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chitosan Hydrogel after full pulpotomy
Chitosan used as a medicament for pulpotomy as it is non-toxic biocompatible, bioadhesive, biodegradable, has wound healing ability and possesses antimicrobial activity. In addition, it encourages the odontogenic development of dental pulp stem cells.
After control of bleeding in teeth allocated to the intervention group, the gel is to be placed into the pulp chamber to a level 3 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) over the root pulp stumps.
Active Comparator: Platelet Rich Fibrin after full pulpotomy
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is strictly autologous, biocompatible and kind toward pulp, and hence elicits minimal or nil inflammatory response when placed directly over the severed pulp.
After control of bleeding in teeth allocated to the intervention group, the gel is to be placed into the pulp chamber to a level 3 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) over the root pulp stumps.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success Rate
Time Frame: 6 months (Postoperative)
Using Radiographic success criteria by periapical index (Orstavik et al., 1986)
6 months (Postoperative)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1st day up to 7th day
Using Modified Visual Analogue Scale for pain with a straight line with one end (point 0) meaning no pain and the other end (point 10) meaning the worst pain imaginable
1st day up to 7th day
Tooth sensibility
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months (postoperative)
Using Electric pulp test
1,3,6 months (postoperative)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ENDO9-1-2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Full Pulpotomy

Subscribe