Compartiendo Salud: Community-Based Intervention for Loneliness (SoledadLP)

February 26, 2025 updated by: Servicio Canario de Salud

Effectiveness of a Community Intervention in Reducing the Feeling of Unwanted Loneliness, Social Risk, and Social Isolation in the Population Over 65 Years Old in La Palma, Focusing on Healthy Habits, Sleep Hygiene, and Digital Literacy

Unwanted loneliness is the gap between the social relations a person has and those they want. The main objective of this research is to assess the impact of a multidimensional community-based intervention on the feeling of unwanted loneliness in the population over the age of 65 years old, who living alone, under social risk or socially isolated living in the La Palma island.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Loneliness is strongly associated with a significant impact on physical health, depression and may in fact be an independent risk factor for depression. Fur-thermore, it is negatively associated with healt problems, like higher blood pressure, poorer sleep, immune responses to stress, and poorer cognition over time in the elderly. The absence of personal connections is related to the adoption of worse life habits and to increased morbidity, with the consequent higher risk of suf-fering cardiovascular and endocrine diseases, mental health pathologies and risk of falls.

The secondary objectives proposed are as follows: Increasing the number of opportunities for social interaction during the intervention; Contributing tools to improve the participants' social skills in the intervention; Fostering self-care and healthy habits in the participants; Reducing maladaptive thoughts; Educating on sleep hygiene measures and non-pharmacological treatments.

The null hypothesis (H0) of this research is that in the population under study, the proposed multidimensional community intervention will not significantly impact the feeling of unwanted loneliness and the health management of these subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • La Palma Health Area. Canary Islands Health Service.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People over the age of 65 and living alone
  • Nursing diagnosis of social risk
  • Nursing diagnosis of social isolation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presenting moderate/severe cognitive decline or Pfeiffer scores above 6
  • individuals with uncorrected hearing deficits that hinder group interaction
  • participants not subjected to the pre- and post-interventions measurements
  • participants that do not take part in at least four of the five sessions scheduled

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention proposed (Compartiendo Salud) is a multicomponent intervention based on prevention and on promoting the health of older adults that live alone. Quasi-experimental study was designed with pre- and post- intervention (at three months) measurements, with no Control Group or randomisation.
The intervention proposed (Compartiendo Salud) is a multicomponent intervention based on prevention and on promoting the health of older adults that live alone. The community-based intervention consists in five workshops that are carried out during a week (one day for each workshop). The sessions (which last 2.5 hours each) are designed in an expository and participatory way, using gaming dynamics that foster learning and social interaction. The content of the workshops is the same for all BHDs. Each workshop addresses risk factors that predispose the population to experiencing more unwanted loneliness and social isolation. The concepts corresponding to each of the five sessions that comprise the intervention are: Sleep hygiene, Healthy and sustainable eating habits, Physical activity and exercise, Memory and music therapy, Digital literacy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Feeling of unwanted loneliness
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
It was measured using the "UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles) Loneliness scale" test validated in Spain. This instrument is based on three dimensions: Relational connection; Social connection; and Self-perceived isolation. It uses a 4-point scale ranging from "Never" to "Frequently" for responses 10 items. Scores above 30 correspond to "No loneliness", between 20 and 30 mean "Moderate loneliness" and less than 20 points is "Severe loneliness"
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Social risk
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
It was measured using the Gijón Social risk detection questionnaire. It assesses family and economic situations, housing, social relations and support from social networks. It uses a 5-point scale ranging from best to worse situation, for responses 5 items. Scores: Good/Acceptable social situation: from 5 to 9 points; Social risk: from 10 to 14; and social problem: more than 15
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Low Perceived social support
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
It was measured with Duke's questionnaire. It assesses perceived social support and consists of 11 items, each one assessed with a Likert scale from 1 to 5. Scores equal to or higher than 32 indicate "Normal support", whereas less than 32 points means "Low perceived social support"
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Anxiety or depression
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
They were assessed using Goldberg's questionnaire with two subscales: Anxiety and Depression. Each of them is structured with 4 initial screening items to determine the probability of a mental disorder and a second group with 5 items that are only formulated if positive answers are given to the screening questions (at least 2 in the Anxiety subscale and at least 1 in the Depression subscale). The type of response of the questionnaire is dichotomous (Yes/No). The cut-off points are as follows: scores equal to or higher than 4 for the Anxiety subscale; and values equal to or higher than 2 for Depression. In the geriatric population, it has been proposed to use it as a single scale, with a cut-off point equal to or higher than 6
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Risk of loneliness
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Nursing diagnosis "Risk of loneliness" (Yes/No) and presence/absence of each of its defining characteristics: Affective deprivation; Emotional Deprivation; Physical isolation; Social isolation.
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Social Isolation
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Nursing diagnosis "Social Isolation" (Yes/No) and presence/absence of each of its defining characteristics: Low social activity levels; Change in physical aspect; Explicit dissatisfaction with social connections; Social reclusion; Social behaviour inconsistent with cultural norms; Reporting feeling insecure in public; Reduced eye contact.
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Smoking
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
The smoking assessment included in the habits module of the electronic clinical history of Primary Health Care of the Canary Islands Health Service Drago-AP will be used: Non-smoker/Smoker in undetermined phase/Smoker in pre-contemplation phase (consonant)/Smoker in contemplation phase (dissonant)/Smoker in preparation phase/Smoker in action phase/Smoker in maintenance phase/Former smoker since 1-10 years/Former smoker since more than 10 years/Passive smoker
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with alcoholism
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
The alcoholism assessment included in the habits module of the electronic clinical history of Primary Health Care of the Canary Islands Health Service Drago-AP will be used: Non-drinker/Moderate drinker/Risk drinker/Drinking problem
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants without sleep problems
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Sleep problem (Yes/No)
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with caregiver
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Dichotomous variables (Yes/No)
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants belonging to an organized group
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Dichotomous variables (Yes/No)
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants what does it feel like Integrated in the area where they live
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Dichotomous variables (Yes/No)
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Activities in free and/or leisure time
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Dichotomous variables (Yes/No)
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Number of Participants with Home-based care; Social assistance
Time Frame: Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)
Dichotomous variables (Yes/No)
Pre- and post- intervention (at three months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alba Francisco-Sánchez, Nursing Specialist, Atención Primaria. Área de Salud de La Palma. Servicio Canario de Salud

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHUC_2023_94

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon reasonable request. The data to be shared will include all IPD that underlie results in a publication, as well as the statistical analysis plan, informed consent form and the analytic code.

All sensitive data will be anonymized to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of the participants.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The complete IPD will be available for sharing six months after the study's conclusion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

As an access criterion for Individual Participant Data (IPD), it is required that no information be requested that could compromise the anonymity of participants. This ensures adherence to ethical research standards and the protection of personal data, safeguarding the confidentiality and privacy of all individuals involved.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loneliness

Clinical Trials on Compartiendo Salud

Subscribe