Comparison of Blood Products Required Using Two Different ROTEM Cut-offs Before Invasive Procedures in Cirrhosis and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) Patients With Severe Coagulopathy

Comparison of Blood Products Required Using Two Different ROTEM Cut-offs Before Invasive Procedures in Cirrhosis and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) Patients With Severe Coagulopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Coagulation system in cirrhotics patients is a fragile state , which is rebalanced hemostasis. Standard tests (INR/aPTT) stop measuring at first stage of coagulation ,when the clot first form. VETs measure the whole process such as ROTEM, TEG and comparing these two tests to assess for transfusion of blood products for invasive procedures. . ROTEM provides information both on anti coagulant and procoagulant status where as conventional tests provide only anti coagulant status Invasive procedures can be low risk or high risk or Non surgical vs surgical, Procedure related bleed occurs in 7% of patients with cirrhosis and associated with higher 28 day mortality. MELD, CTP ,AKI , SEPSIS increase the risk of procedure related bleed. Hence for invasive procedures investigator is using relaxing threshold for blood product transfusion in cirrhosis, ACLF patients. As use of ROTEM when compared to conventional tests reduces the need for blood transfusion. Investigator want to proceed with further relaxation of cutoff values of Coagulation parameters and use High cutoff vs low cut off for blood transfusion need.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim and Objective - To evaluate the efficacy and safety of relaxed threshold (compared to threshold) for blood product transfusion for invasive procedures in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.

Hypothesis - Relaxing the threshold ( as compared to conventional threshold ) for blood product transfusion will decrease the need for blood products without increase the bleeding complications for invasive procedures in cirrhosis and acute on chronic liver failure patients( ACLF)

Sample size with justification:

Assuming the prevalence rate is 50% (TUSHAR THESIS -yet to be published), that is need of transfusion of blood produtcs in standard cutoff and relaxed cutoff , as according to this study the need in relaxed cut off has been reduced,investigator assumed the need in High cut off group is reduced to 40%, with alpha-5%, power-80%, investigator need to enroll 417 in each group with defaulter of 10% , it decided to have cases that is 934 total Monitoring and assessment: All patients would undergo vital and baseline parameter screening before randomization. Based on randomization investigator will assess the need for transfusion , and complications post procedure , post transfusion if any for a duration of 1month.

Intervention: Patient after screening for all exclusion criteria will be randomized to procedure after or before transfusion of blood products and will be assessed the safety of procedure related bleed and need of intervention post procedure if any

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

934

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cirrhosis and ACLF ( as per definition)
  2. Planned to undergo invasive procedures
  3. Severe Coagulopathy- INR>2.0 or Platelets <30k or Fibrinogen<100mg/dl .

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing bleeding
  2. Bleeding in past 48 hours before procedure
  3. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy ( stopped < 7 days before)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low Cut Off
EXTEM CT>80sec, CL130<50% FIBTEM- Mcf>8
ROTEM Tests
Experimental: High Cut Off
EXTEM CT>100sec, CL130<40% FIBTEM- Mcf<6
ROTEM Tests
No Intervention: On demand
No pre procedure blood products transfusions will be given. Transfusions will be given after the procedure if any bleeding complications occur

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with reduction in the amount of total components transfused in high cut off ROTEM compared to low cut off ROTEM in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.
Time Frame: Day 28
High Cutoff defined as need of low blood transfusion products (CT->100sec,MCF<25,CLI30<40%,MCF -FIB<6mm) and Low Cut off defined as (CT ->80sec, MCF<35, CLI30<50%,MCF-FIB<6mm)
Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the impact of ROTEM on transfusion requirements.
Time Frame: Day 28
Impact of standard ROTEM on transfusion requirements that is proportion Of FFP, PLATELETS,CRYO, PCC, FIBRINOGEN before procedure in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.
Day 28
Evaluate the incidence of bleeding events post procedure in Low cutoff.
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Mortality related with procedural bleeding in both groups.
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Proportion of the patient requiring procedural based treatment that is number of blood transfusions, angioembolization after post procedural bleed.
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
To compare the rate of transfusion reactions in relaxed ROTEM vs standard ROTEM in cirrhosis and ACLF.
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

Clinical Trials on ROTEM

Subscribe