Comparative Analysis of PCM With ROTEM in the Measurement of Viscoelastic Coagulation Parameters

April 15, 2020 updated by: Entegrion, Inc.

Comparative Analysis of the Entegrion Point of Care Coagulation Monitor (PCM) With ROTEM in the Measurement of Viscoelastic Coagulation Parameters

To determine if PMC viscoelastic coagulation parameters correlate with those generated by a marketed device in adult patients who require hemostasis monitoring or who are at risk of bleeding or thrombotic indications

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this study is a performance evaluation of the PCM coagulation monitor in comparison to the ROTEM thromboelastometry system.

To include a measurement of the entire range of the test system, subjects with a medical management need that requires the measurement of their hemostasis status (such as PT/PTT, INR) or are at risk for being hypo-coagulable or hyper-coagulable will be included in this study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University in St. Louis
        • Contact:
          • Clinical Research Nurse
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Completed
        • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Recruiting
        • Thomas Jefferson University
        • Contact:
          • Clinical Research Nurse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male and female patients who have a medical management need that requires measurement of their hemostasis status or are at risk of being hypocoagulable or hypercoagulable

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • In opinion of investigator, absence of anything that precludes subject from being good study candidate
  • Informed consent
  • Order for measurement of hemostasis status of patients who are at risk for being hyper-coagulable or hypo-coagulable due to clinical diagnosis or medical need

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous enrollment in study
  • Incarcerated
  • Heparin infusion in prior 24 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
All subjects
No intervention
Test of blood sample by both PCM and ROTEM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM NATEM)
Time Frame: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling
Deming regression will be used to compare the PCM and the ROTEM NATEM assay (which reports clotting time, speed of clot formation, maximal clot firmness and clot lysis)
Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM INTEM, EXTEM)
Time Frame: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling
Deming regression will be used to compare the PCM and the ROTEM INTEM and EXTEM assays (which both report clotting time, speed of clot formation, maximal clot firmness and clot lysis)
Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling
Correlation between abnormalities
Time Frame: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling
Correlation between abnormalities as assessed by conventional coagulation assays (such as fibrinogen concentration, CBC, PT, PTT, INR), vital signs, demographics or trauma (if any)
Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PCM-002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemostasis Monitoring

Clinical Trials on PCM and ROTEM

Subscribe