The Interplay Between Moral Distress, Moral Resilience, and Mental Health Outcomes Among Neonatal Care Providers (MoD)

February 17, 2025 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Exploring the Interplay Between Moral Distress, Moral Resilience, and Mental Health Outcomes Among Neonatal Care Providers

Due to highly specialized medical care neonatal care providers are faced with numerous responsibilities which makes neonatal care a particularly challenging and stressful work environment. Moral Distress (MoD) is an increasingly perceived phenomenon, which occurs if a person is prevented from doing what she or he believe is morally right. Such situations are common in neonatal care and MoD has severe negative consequences, including burnout and resignation. There is a significant gap of knowledge on the prevalence of MoD among neonatal care providers. In addition, the complex interplay between MoD and burnout is largely unexplored. The understanding of MoD and the exploration of possible influencing factors are indispensable prerequisites for effectively targeting and mitigating the negative effects of MoD.

Aims: This project aims at providing normative data on the prevalence of MoD among neonatal care providers in German speaking Switzerland. This project will further explore the interplay between MoD and burnout as well as the role of protective and reinforcing factors including moral resilience, perceived stress, mental health and workload.

Design: A prospective observational mixed methods study will be conducted among neonatal care providers in Swiss secondary and tertiary care neonatal units. Over a one-year period, neonatal care providers will be repeatedly asked to answer a survey on MoD and associated outcomes. Semi-structured interviews will be performed to gain detailed information on what constitutes MoD.

Significance: The study results will allow a robust assessment of the extent of MoD in the neonatal care environment. They will further provide information regarding the feasibility of a continuous screening approach. In the effort to optimize the work environment of healthcare workers in ethically complex clinical settings, in-depth exploration MoD is indispensable. The results of this study may help establish an approach to continuous assessment, and thus provide a basis for verifiable interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Highly specialized medical care is required to ensure the survival and healthy development of the many infants who are either born critically ill or prematurely.

Working in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is particularly demanding. Neonatal care providers are faced with numerous medical, emotional and ethical challenges including emergencies and severe pathologies, highly stressed parents, infants hospitalized for months, suffering and death. In Swiss perinatal centers, more than 200 extremely premature infants die each year. In addition, in view of the persistent uncertainty of outcomes, decision making with parents can be extremely challenging. Parental values and beliefs may compete with the principles of the medical team.

Moral distress (MoD) is an increasingly recognized phenomenon that occurs when a person is prevented from taking an action that he or she believes to be morally right. It is thought that such situations are common in neonatal care and that MoD has serious negative consequences, including burnout and resignation. In many parts of the world, there is a significant gap in knowledge about the extent of MoD among neonatal care providers. Furthermore, the complex interplay between MoD and mental health outcomes remains largely unexplored. Improving the understanding of MoD and exploring its possible determinants are essential to effectively target and mitigate its negative effects.

This project aims to provide normative data on the extent of MoD among neonatal care providers in several third level German speaking hospitals in Switzerland. This project will further explore the interaction between MoD and burnout symptoms, as well as the role of possible protective and moderating factors, including moral resilience, psychological distress, perceived stress, and workload.

This study breaks new ground with new instruments and therefore has pilot character. In this study, quantitative and qualitative research methods will be used in the sense of a mixed methods approach. With this research approach, it is possible to obtain empirical data to inform relevant stakeholders, but also to obtain rich and narrowly focused data in words to achieve the aim of a better understanding MoD and of exploring the interplay between MoD, moral resilience and mental health outcomes. More specifically, the study uses classical empirical data collection, but also includes semi-structured interviews with neonatal care providers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Neonatal care providers will be approached locally by the researchers themselves. Selection will be based on the list of inclusion criteria.

Informed consent: Participants will receive electronic study information in REDCap, via e-mail and podcast and will give written informed consent at the time of recruitment. Participation is completely voluntary and no negative consequences will arise when participation is denied. Participants are informed that they may withdraw from the study at any time without consequence.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neonatal care providers working in a Department of Neonatology or a Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine with focus on neonates, regardless of professional group or level of education (all health care professionals - e.g., nurses, neonatologists, intensivists, residents, psychologists, fellows, nursing and medical students).
  • At least 2 weeks of practice on the unit in the 3 months prior to each survey.
  • Written informed consent
  • Self-reported sufficient knowledge of the German language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported acute psychiatric illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moral Distress
Time Frame: 1 year

Composite score (frequency x intensity) of the Revised Moral Distress Scale (MDS-R). The MDS-R is a more specific 21-item instrument that allows evaluating the frequency and intensity of MoD in clinical contexts.

(There is a 0 to 4 Likert score for each questions for frequency and intensity Then for each item, the frequency × intensity (fxi) score is calculated, which ranges from 0 to 16. Next, the composite score is obtained by summing each item's fxi score. The resulting score based on 21 items has a range of 0-336. A higher score indicating a more frequent and more intense Moral Distress)

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year

Sum score of Wocial's Moral Distress Thermometer (MDT). The MDT is a rapid screening tool to detect MoD.

(Scale from 1 to 10, with higher values indicating more Moral Distress)

1 year
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year

Sum score of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) - The MBI is a standardized measurement instrument for the assessment burnout syndrome.

(Scale from 0 to 6, 22 items, 3 factors: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, higher score indicating higher degrees fo each factor, for exhaustion and depersonalization higher scores indicate higher burnout, for accomplishment higher scores indicate lower burnout)

1 year
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year
Sum score of the Muir matches scale - The Muir matches scale is a visual scale that allows participants to point at one of eight matches to indicate how burnt out they feel. (number 8 indicating the highest level of burnout)
1 year
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year

Differences in MDS-R site-specific. The MDS-R is a more specific 21-item instrument that allows evaluating the frequency and intensity of MoD in clinical contexts.

(There is a 0 to 4 Likert score for each questions for frequency and intensity Then for each item, the frequency × intensity (fxi) score is calculated, which ranges from 0 to 16. Next, the composite score is obtained by summing each item's fxi score. The resulting score based on 21 items has a range of 0-336. A higher score indicating a more frequent and more intense Moral Distress)

1 year
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year

Differences in MBI site-specific. - The MBI is a standardized measurement instrument for the assessment burnout syndrome.

(Scale from 0 to 6, 22 items, 3 factors: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, higher score indicating higher degrees fo each factor, for exhaustion and depersonalization higher scores indicate higher burnout, for accomplishment higher scores indicate lower burnout)

1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Further outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
Free-text comments from the questionnaire. There is no scale/score in this outcome because participants are free to write down any text concerning moral distress or burnout.
1 year
Further outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
Semi-structured interviews with selected participants, convenience sample
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: André Kidszun, Professor, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 4, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-01953

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Moral Distress

Subscribe