- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07455370
A Study of Moral Distress, Moral Injury and Post-Traumatic Stress for Nurses (MDMIPTS)
June 18, 2026 updated by: Melissa A. Wilson, Mayo Clinic
Moral Distress, Moral Injury and Post-Traumatic Stress Among Mayo Clinic Nurses
The goal of this descriptive study is to examine levels of moral distress (MD), moral injury (MI), & post-traumatic stress (PTS) levels among nursing staff at Mayo Clinic. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Determine the levels of MD, MI, and PTS symptoms experienced by nurses who participate in the study.
- Evaluate differences in MD, MI, and PTS symptoms by setting, specialties, and geographic locations.
- Examine demographic and professional characteristics that are associated with high levels of MD, MI and PTS.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
21300
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32250
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Mayo Clinic Department of Nursing Staff across all Mayo Clinic sites, including: Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic in Arizona; Mayo Clinic in Florida; and Mayo Clinic Health System sites in the midwest.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Mayo Clinic Department of Nursing Staff including:
- Registered nurses
- Licensed practical nurses
- Nursing support staff (including roles such as patient care assistants, patient care specialists, medical assistants, and nurse technicians)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Social workers
- Chaplains
- Unit coordinators
- Other staff who do not support direct patient care but are within the nursing department
- Other employees outside the Department of Nursing
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Mayo Clinic Nurses
Mayo Clinic Department of Nursing staff across the enterprise including advanced practice nurses, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and nursing support/unlicensed staff.
|
Participants will complete an electronic survey containing the Measure of Moral Distress- Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) including functional outcome measures adapted from the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning, The PCL-5 Checklist for DSM-5 (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PSTD) Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5)) (PCL-5), and the Well-Being Index (WBI), additionally including a demographic questionnaire with wellbeing questions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measure of Moral Distress-Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The MMD-HP (Measure of Moral Distress-Healthcare Professionals) is a 27-item moral distress scale.
A composite score is computed for items 1 - 25 and is obtained by multiplying the frequency scores (0 = Never to 4 = Very Frequently scale) and the distress scores (0 = None to 4 = Very Distressing scale) for each item; the products of these can range from 0 - 16. Higher scores indicate a greater deal of moral distress.
|
Baseline
|
|
Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) is a 14-item self-reported survey divided into two subscales-shame-related and trust-violation related.
Both the shame and trust-violated subscales are seven items per subscale.
Respondents are asked to indicate how strongly they agree with each statement in the past month using a 5 point Likert scale where 0 = Strongly Disagree and 4 = Strongly Agree.
The total score range for each subscale is 0 - 28, and the overall score range is 0 - 56.
Symptom severity is categorized as follows: 14 - 28 indicates mild moral injury, 29 - 42 indicates moderate moral injury, and 35 - 56 indicates severe moral injury.
|
Baseline
|
|
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PCL-5) score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The PCL - 5 (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PSTD) Checklist) is a 20-item self-reported survey that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD.
Respondents are asked to indicate the frequency that each item occurs on a 5 point Likert scale where 0 = Not at All and 4 = Extremely.
The total score is the sum of all 20 questions, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of PTSD.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cindy Tofthagen, PhD, Mayo Clinic
- Principal Investigator: Melissa A Wilson, PhD, Mayo Clinic
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
- Litz BT, Stein N, Delaney E, Lebowitz L, Nash WP, Silva C, Maguen S. Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: a preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Dec;29(8):695-706. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
- Wortmann JH, Jordan AH, Weathers FW, Resick PA, Dondanville KA, Hall-Clark B, Foa EB, Young-McCaughan S, Yarvis JS, Hembree EA, Mintz J, Peterson AL, Litz BT. Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403. doi: 10.1037/pas0000260. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
- Austin CL, Saylor R, Finley PJ. Moral distress in physicians and nurses: Impact on professional quality of life and turnover. Psychol Trauma. 2017 Jul;9(4):399-406. doi: 10.1037/tra0000201. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
- Schuster M, Dwyer PA. Post-traumatic stress disorder in nurses: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2769-2787. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15288. Epub 2020 May 5.
- Maguen S, Litz BT. Moral Injury in Veterans of War. PTSD Research Quarterly (RQ). 2012;23(1):1-3.
- Shay J. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. New York, NY: Scribner; 1994. 246 p.
- Wingfield T, Taegtmeyer M. Healthcare workers and Coronavirus: Behind the stiff upper lip we are highly vulnerable Waltham, MA: The Conversation; 2020 [Available from: https://theconversation.com/healthcare-workers-and-coronavirus-behind-the-stiff-upper-lip-we-are-highly-vulnerable-133864.
- American Association of Critical Care Nurses. AACN Public Policy Position Statement 2001. Aliso Viejo, CA: American Association of Critical Care Nurses; 2001.
- American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Moral distress public policy position statement. Aliso Viejo, CA: American Association of Critical Care Nurses; 2008.
- Dyrbye LN, Johnson PO, Johnson LM, Satele DV, Shanafelt TD. Efficacy of the Well-Being Index to Identify Distress and Well-Being in U.S. Nurses. Nurs Res. 2018 Nov/Dec;67(6):447-455. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000313.
- Houle SA, Ein N, Gervasio J, Plouffe RA, Litz BT, Carleton RN, Hansen KT, Liu JJW, Ashbaugh AR, Callaghan W, Thompson MM, Easterbrook B, Smith-MacDonald L, Rodrigues S, Belanger SAH, Bright K, Lanius RA, Baker C, Younger W, Bremault-Phillips S, Hosseiny F, Richardson JD, Nazarov A; Atlas Institute Moral Injury Research Community of Practice. Measuring moral distress and moral injury: A systematic review and content analysis of existing scales. Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;108:102377. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102377. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
- Booth AT, Robinson KL. System-wide assessment using the Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare professionals. Nurs Ethics. 2025 Aug;32(5):1629-1643. doi: 10.1177/09697330251324296. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
- D'Alessandro-Lowe AM, Patel H, Easterbrook B, Ritchie K, Brown A, Xue Y, Karram M, Millman H, Sullo E, Pichtikova M, Nicholson A, Heber A, Malain A, O'Connor C, Schielke H, Rodrigues S, Hosseiny F, McCabe RE, Lanius RA, McKinnon MC. The independent and combined impact of moral injury and moral distress on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2299661. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2299661. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
- Brennan CJ, Roberts C, Cole JC. Prevalence of occupational moral injury and post-traumatic embitterment disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 20;14(2):e071776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071776.
- Weber MC, Smith AJ, Jones RT, Holmes GA, Johnson AL, Patrick RNC, Alexander MD, Miyazaki Y, Wright H, Ehman AC, Langenecker SA, Benight CC, Pyne JM, Harris JI, Usset TJ, Maguen S, Griffin BJ. Moral injury and psychosocial functioning in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Serv. 2023 Feb;20(1):19-29. doi: 10.1037/ser0000718. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
- Ehman AC, Smith AJ, Wright H, Langenecker SA, Benight CC, Maguen S, Pyne JM, Harris JI, Cooney N, Griffin BJ. Exposure to potentially morally injurious events and mental health outcomes among frontline workers affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Psychol Trauma. 2023 Mar;15(3):524-535. doi: 10.1037/tra0001345. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
- Hines SE, Chin KH, Glick DR, Wickwire EM. Trends in Moral Injury, Distress, and Resilience Factors among Healthcare Workers at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;18(2):488. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020488.
- Papazoglou K, Chopko B. The Role of Moral Suffering (Moral Distress and Moral Injury) in Police Compassion Fatigue and PTSD: An Unexplored Topic. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 15;8:1999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01999. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.
- Gibbons SW, Shafer M, Hickling EJ, Ramsey G. How do deployed health care providers experience moral injury? Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2013 Winter;3(3):247-59. doi: 10.1353/nib.2013.0055.
- Yan GW. The Invisible Wound: Moral Injury and Its Impact on the Health of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans. Mil Med. 2016 May;181(5):451-8. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00103.
- Horesh D, Brown AD. Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):331-335. doi: 10.1037/tra0000592.
- Agazio J, Goodman P. Making the hard decisions: Ethical care decisions in wartime nursing practice. Nurs Outlook. 2017 Sep-Oct;65(5S):S92-S99. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
- Gibbons SW, Shafer M, Aramanda L, Hickling EJ, Benedek DM. Combat health care providers and resiliency: adaptive coping mechanisms during and after deployment. Psychol Serv. 2014 May;11(2):192-9. doi: 10.1037/a0033165. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
- Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prompahakul C, Thacker LR, Hamric AB. Enhancing Understanding of Moral Distress: The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):113-124. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 3, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 23, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 18, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
- Mental Disorders
- Stress Disorders, Traumatic
- Behavior
- Personal Satisfaction
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
- Psychological Well-Being
- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Investigative Techniques
- Epidemiologic Methods
- Data Collection
- Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms
- Quality of Health Care
- Public Health
- Environment and Public Health
- Surveys and Questionnaires
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25-008396
- Mayo Clinic CTSA (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.