NeuroReAlign Therapy for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients with Stroke

March 13, 2025 updated by: Anas Radi Hassan Alashram, Middle East University

Effects of NeuroReAlign Therapy on Cognition in Patients with Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effects of NeuroReAlign Therapy on cognition in stroke survivors in the chronic stage (>6 months). The study will include male and female participants aged 18-70 years.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does NeuroReAlign Therapy improve cognition in stroke survivors compared to conventional physiotherapy? Researchers will compare NeuroReAlign Therapy to conventional cognitive therapy to determine its effects on cognition.

Participants will:

Undergo NeuroReAlign Therapy or conventional cognitive therapy for 4 weeks. Have their cognition evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test (TMT), Stroop Test, Digit Span Test, and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT).

Complete outcome assessments at baseline and after the intervention (week 4).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Have a stroke more than 6 months
  • Age between 18 and 70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe cognitive impairments
  • Patients cannot walk independently

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional cognitive training
A conventional cognitive training protocol involves structured, repetitive exercises designed to enhance specific cognitive functions, such as memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed. These training programs are delivered through paper-and-pencil tasks, computer-based exercises, and therapist-guided activities. Tasks used include working memory exercises (e.g., digit span recall), attention training (e.g., Stroop test, visual scanning), problem-solving activities (e.g., Tower of Hanoi), and language exercises (e.g., verbal fluency tasks), for 45 minutes per session, 3 times weekly, for 4 weeks.
A conventional cognitive training protocol involves structured, repetitive exercises designed to enhance specific cognitive functions, such as memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed. These training programs are delivered through paper-and-pencil tasks, computer-based exercises, and therapist-guided activities. Tasks used include working memory exercises (e.g., digit span recall), attention training (e.g., Stroop test, visual scanning), problem-solving activities (e.g., Tower of Hanoi), and language exercises (e.g., verbal fluency tasks), for 45 minutes per session, 3 times weekly, for 4 weeks.
Experimental: NeuroReAlign Therapy
Patients in this group will receive NeuroReAlign Therapy, including motor training (e.g., treadmill training, balance training), multimodal sensory stimulation (e.g., proprioceptive and visual), cognitive training (e.g., traditional cognitive exercise), and motivation, for 45 minutes per session, 3 times weekly, for 4 weeks.
Patients in this group will receive NeuroReAlign Therapy, including motor training (e.g., treadmill training, balance training), multimodal sensory stimulation (e.g., proprioceptive and visual), cognitive training (e.g., traditional cognitive exercise), and motivation, for 45 minutes per session, 3 times weekly, for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used screening tool designed to assess mild cognitive impairment in stroke survivors and other neurological populations. It evaluates multiple cognitive domains, including attention, memory, visuospatial abilities, executive function, language, and orientation. The test consists of 30 points, with a cutoff score of <26 suggesting cognitive impairment. The MoCA is sensitive to subtle cognitive deficits and is particularly useful in detecting post-stroke cognitive impairments that may not be captured by other general cognitive tests.
At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a brief, standardized cognitive test used to assess overall cognitive function in stroke survivors. It evaluates orientation, attention, memory, language, and visuospatial skills, with a total score of 30 points. Lower scores indicate greater cognitive impairment, with a cutoff of ≤24 typically suggesting cognitive dysfunction. Although widely used, the MMSE may be less sensitive to detecting mild cognitive impairment compared to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a neuropsychological test used to assess processing speed, attention, and executive function in stroke survivors. It consists of two parts: TMT part A, where participants connect numbers in ascending order to measure processing speed and visual search, and TMT part B, where they alternate between numbers and letters (1-A-2-B, etc.) to assess cognitive flexibility and executive function. Longer completion times indicate greater impairment. The TMT is widely used to evaluate cognitive deficits following stroke, particularly in domains related to attention and task-switching.
At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
Stroop Test
Time Frame: At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
The Stroop Test assesses cognitive control, attention, and response inhibition, which are often affected after a stroke. It requires participants to name the color of printed words while ignoring the actual word meaning (e.g., saying "blue" when the word "RED" is printed in blue ink). The test measures processing speed, selective attention, and executive function by evaluating the ability to suppress automatic responses. Poor performance on the Stroop Test may indicate deficits in cognitive control and attention regulation, which are common in post-stroke cognitive impairment.
At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
Digit Span Test
Time Frame: At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
The Digit Span Test, a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), assesses attention, working memory, and verbal short-term memory. Participants are asked to repeat a series of numbers in the same order (forward digit span) or in reverse order (backward digit span). The backward span is particularly sensitive to working memory deficits, which are frequently observed in stroke survivors. This test is simple yet effective in evaluating short-term memory and cognitive processing capacity.
At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
Verbal Fluency Test (VFT)
Time Frame: At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
The Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) measures language function, executive control, and processing speed. It consists of two types: phonemic fluency, where participants generate words starting with a specific letter, and semantic fluency, where they list words within a given category (e.g., animals). The number of correct words generated within a time limit (usually 60 seconds) reflects cognitive function, with lower scores indicating language or executive dysfunction. This test is commonly used to assess cognitive deficits in post-stroke patients, particularly those affecting language and retrieval ability.
At baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Conventional cognitive training

Subscribe