Impact of Pharmacogenetic-Guided Treatment on Type 2 Diabetes. (EPHIC-DIA2)

Open-label, Double-arm, Controlled, Randomized, Multicentre Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Pharmacogenetic-guided Treatment in Patients With Insufficiently Controlled Type 2 Diabetes.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of a pharmacogenetics-guided treatment, compared to standard optimized treatment, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the disease better controlled when the treatment prescribed is based on the participant's pharmacogenetic profile?
  • What medical problems do participants experience while taking the treatment?

Participants will:

  • Take the treatment described according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
  • Visit the clinic once every 12 weeks for checkups and tests.
  • Keep a diary of their symptoms to inform the Investigator.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a growing disease that causes serious complications and represents a significant public health burden. Despite current therapies, many patients fail to achieve adequate glycemic control, highlighting the need for more personalized approaches. This study seeks to demonstrate that pharmacogenetics, which tailors treatments according to patients' genetic variations, can improve disease control, reduce adverse effects, and ultimately optimize healthcare resources, improving patients' quality of life.

Study Design:

This is a Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, controlled, two-arm, crossover clinical trial. The study will include at least 504 patients, who will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive pharmacogenetics-guided treatment or standard treatment for type 2 diabetes. Once proven to meet eligibility criteria, patients will be assigned to a treatment arm and will participate in the study for the next 24 weeks.

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacogenetics-guided treatment, compared to optimized standard treatment, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Secondary Objective:

To evaluate pharmacogenetic markers with the effect of treatment administered prior to randomization.

Exploratory Objectives:

  • To evaluate the percentage of patients achieving the target of dyslipidemia and its relationship with the genetic variations present in these subjects.
  • To evaluate the percentage of patients reaching the blood pressure target and its relationship with the genetic variations present in these subjects.
  • To evaluate the incidence and relationship of adverse events of glucose control drugs with genetic variations.

Safety Objective:

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the glucose control drugs prescribed in each group of patients.

Target Population:

Patients between 40 and 70 years old, with a body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 40 kg/m² and with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 9.5%) and receiving standard non-insulin treatment for at least 6 months will be included. Patients will be visited at 12 and 24 weeks from the start of the study.

Statistical Methods:

The sample size was calculated with an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.1, using a bilateral test. A total of 252 subjects in each group (standard and pharmacogenetics-guided treatment) are required to detect a significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c ≤7%. A dropout rate of 10% is expected. Follow-up of patients will be 24 weeks, sufficient time to observe improvements in glycemic control. The goal is to achieve an HbA1c ≤7%, as recommended by the American Diabetes Association. It is estimated that 50% of patients will achieve the target with antidiabetic treatment, and it is assumed that pharmacogenetics-guided treatment will have at least a 15% greater response than conventional treatment, due to genetic variations.

The main objective is to evaluate the impact of pharmacogenetics-guided treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes, comparing proportions between groups. Analyses will be performed according to the type of variable: Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney for quantitative variables and Fisher's exact test or chi-square tests for qualitative variables. The software used will be R (version 3.6.1), with two-way tests and an alpha risk of 0.05, verifying normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

504

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Málaga, Spain, 29010
        • Hospital Universitario Regional de Malaga
      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
      • Valencia, Spain, 46014
        • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia (HGUV)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 40-70 years old, included.
  2. Body Mass Index (BMI) between 25-40 kg/m².
  3. Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.
  4. Patients with T2D insufficiently controlled (Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7-9.5%) with current (≥6 months) "standard of care" treatment, excluding the use of insulin.
  5. The subject has provided written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedure.
  6. Able and willing to comply with requested study visits and procedures.
  7. Contraceptive measures, only for female participants:

    • A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and one of the following conditions applies:
    • Is a woman of non-childbearing potential (WONCBP) OR
    • Is a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and agrees to use a contraceptive method that is highly effective, with a failure rate of <1%, during the study intervention period (to be effective before starting the intervention).

A WOCBP must have a negative urine pregnancy test before the first administration of study intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Treatment with insulin at the time of screening.
  2. HbA1c >9.5% at screening.
  3. Treatment with more than 3 glucose-lowering drugs at the time of screening.
  4. Chronic renal disease defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m² (many glucose-lowering drugs are not approved or require dosage adjustments for use in these patients) at the screening visit.
  5. Hepatic insufficiency, which contraindicates the use of glucose-lowering drugs.
  6. Currently receiving treatment in another investigational drug study, or less than 30 days since ending treatment in another investigational drug study.
  7. Pregnancy or lactation.
  8. Women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive methods.
  9. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure.
  10. Subject likely to not be available to complete all protocol-required study visits or procedures, and/or to comply with all required study procedures to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge.
  11. Subject is study staff directly involved with the study or is a family member of the investigational study staff.
  12. Life expectancy predicted to be <2 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pharmacogenetic-guided treatment

Patient treatment will be selected according to previously identified genetic variations. Study treatments and posology from enrollment to the end of treatment at Week 24 can be:

  1. Metformin (daily dose 2000 mg).
  2. GLP1 receptor analogs: dulaglutide and semaglutide.
  3. SGLT2 inhibitors: empagliflozin, canagliflozin and dapagliflozin.
  4. Pioglitazone.
  5. DPP4 inhibitors: sitagliptin, vildagliptin and linagliptin. Or a combination of these drugs. Except of metformin, which 2000 mg is the daily dose stablished in this study, for the rest of treatment options, SmPCs guidelines of each treatment will be followed to stablished the daily dose.
Dapagliflozin
Sitagliptin
Dulaglutide
Metformin maximum daily dose 2000 mg
Semaglutide
Empagliflozin
Canagliflozin
Pioglitazone
vildagliptin
linagliptin
Active Comparator: Standard treatment

Patient treatment will be selected according to clinical guidelines. Study treatments and posology from enrollment to the end of treatment at Week 24 can be:

  1. Metformin (daily dose 2000 mg).
  2. GLP1 receptor analogs: dulaglutide and semaglutide.
  3. SGLT2 inhibitors: empagliflozin, canagliflozin and dapagliflozin.
  4. Pioglitazone.
  5. DPP4 inhibitors: sitagliptin, vildagliptin and linagliptin. Or a combination of these drugs. Except of metformin, which 2000 mg is the daily dose stablished in this study, for the rest of treatment options, SmPCs guidelines of each treatment will be followed to stablished the daily dose.
Dapagliflozin
Sitagliptin
Dulaglutide
Metformin maximum daily dose 2000 mg
Semaglutide
Empagliflozin
Canagliflozin
Pioglitazone
vildagliptin
linagliptin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of HbA1c ≤7% goal at Week 24 between Pharmacogenetic-Guided and Standard Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c ≤7% at Week 24 between pharmacogenetic-guided treatment arm and standard treatment arm in subjects with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes. The null hypothesis is that the proportion of patients achieving this goal is equal in both the pharmacogenetic-guided and standard treatment groups.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Pharmacogenetic Markers and Treatment Response Pre-Randomization
Time Frame: Before randomization to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Comparison of pharmacogenetic markers with the effect of pre-randomization treatment. This will be measured by analyzing the pharmacogenetic markers before randomization and their relationship to the treatment response. The endpoint will be the comparison between the proportion of patients who achieved HbA1c ≤7% at baseline (excluded from randomization) and those who did not (included for randomization).
Before randomization to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory Objective (1): percentage of patients achieving the dyslipidemia goal (LDL colesterol/LDL-C <70 mg/dL or <55 mg/Dl) in patients with or without cardiovascular disease (CVD)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Percentage of patients achieving the dyslipidemia goal at Week 24, defined as:

  • LDL-C <70 mg/dL in patients without documented CVD at baseline.
  • LDL-C <55 mg/dL in patients with documented CVD at baseline.

Additionally, the relationship between these outcomes and genetic variations in the subjects will be measured.

From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Exploratory Objective (3): percentage of patients achieving the goal of <140/90 mmHg systolic and diastolic pressure
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
To evaluate the percentage of patients achieving the goal of blood pressure as defined in the study (<140/90 mmHg at Week 24) and its relationship with genetic variations present in those subjects.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Exploratory Objective (4): glucose-lowering drugs' adverse events
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
To evaluate incidence and relatedness of glucose-lowering drugs' adverse events with genetic variations.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (1): Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
To evaluate the percentage of patients who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) from baseline to Week 24 in each treatment group. This will be measured by comparing the proportion of patients who present AEs related to glucose-lowering drugs between baseline and Week 24.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (2): Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
To evaluate the percentage of patients who experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) from baseline to Week 24 in each treatment group. This will be measured by comparing the proportion of patients who present SAEs related to glucose-lowering drugs between baseline and Week 24.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (1): Changes in hepatic function
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Hepatic function will be assessed by measuring liver enzymes such as GOT, GPT, GGT in U/L.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (2): Changes in renal function (eGFR)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Renal function will be assessed by measuring the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in mL/min/m².
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (3): Changes in renal function (creatinine)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Renal function will be assessed by measuring the levels of creatinine (mg/dl).
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (4): Changes in biochemistry parameters (glucose)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
This will be assessed by measuring several biochemistry parameters such as glucose (mg/dl).
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (5): Changes in biochemistry parameters (insulin)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
This will be assessed by measuring several biochemistry parameters such as insulin (mU/L).
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (6): Changes in biochemistry parameters (lipid panel)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
This will be assessed by measuring several biochemistry parameters such as HDL, LDL and total colesterol in mg/l.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (7): Changes in heart rate
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
This will be measured by comparing the heart rate (bpm) from baseline to Week 24 for each treatment group.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Safety Objective (8): Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
This will be measured by comparing the blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to Week 24 for each treatment group.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sergio Martínez Hervás, Doctor, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Clinical Trials on Dapagliflozin

Subscribe