Brentuximab Vedotin with Adriamycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine for Patients Aged 18-59 Years with Untreated Advanced-stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Real-life Experience (FED_RealBV)

February 26, 2025 updated by: Marco Picardi, Federico II University

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is commonly diagnosed in young adults and adults (YP&A) defined by the National Cancer Institute as 18 to 59 years of age. Clinically, these patients often present with poor prognostic factors such as advanced stage. In phase III trials that primarily include patients aged 18 to 59 years, several international cooperative oncology groups have studied new initial treatments for Ann Arbor stage III and IV cHL. These treatments include traditional dose-dense/dose-intensity cytotoxic approaches (such as the FONDAZIONE ITALIANA LINFOMI FIL-ROUGE trial) or novel selectively active agents such as nivolumab (SWOG S1826 trial) or brentuximab vedotin (BV) (HD21 and ECHELON-1 trials). Among these, the most beneficial initial treatment schedule remains controversial, not only because of additional acute toxicities and additional drug-related expenses, but especially for long-term disease control.

Brentuximab Vedotin is a monoclonal antibody conjugated with a protease-cleavable linker to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethylauristatin E, which targets CD30 on Reed-Sternberg cells. The global phase III ECHELON-1 study compared BV in combination with adriamycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV+AVD) versus adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in patients with newly diagnosed stage III and IV cHL.

Among the 1,334 patients included, the majority of cases (1,148; 86%) were YP&A age. At the 51st National Congress of the Italian Society of Hematology, a post-hoc analysis of long-term follow-up data from ECHELON-1 was conducted to assess progression-free survival (PFS) in the subgroup aged 18 to 59 years. YP&A patients received either BV+AVD (N= 580) or ABVD (N= 568): after 2 years of follow-up, the Kaplan-Mayer curve of PFS for BV+AVD flattened with a plateau that remained consistently at 87% up to 7 years with a number of events of 67 compared to the Kaplan-Mayer curve of PFS for ABVD that decreased during follow-up to 79% with a number of 91 events (HR 0.667; 95% CI: 0.486-0.914; P= 0.011 by log-rank test). Based on the study design, no patients in either arm received consolidation radiotherapy to residual nodal masses (RNM). Low rates of second malignancies (5% for BV+AVD vs. 6% for ABVD), no apparent effect on fertility (pregnancies: 92 for BV+AVD vs. 73 for ABVD), and resolution or improvement of peripheral neuropathy in the majority of patients were reported by the investigators. Additionally, the YP&A subgroup showed a 7-year overall survival of 97% (number of events, 21) for BV+AVD vs. 92% (number of events, 39) for ABVD (HR, 0.489; 95% CI, 0.287-0.833; P= 0.007 by log-rank test) with a 51% reduction in the risk of death from any cause 13 . These data underscore the clinical benefit of BV+AVD for patients aged 18-59 years, mainly regarding disease cure, with no new safety signals. Therefore, BV+AVD is one of the standards of care for YP&A with untreated advanced cHL.

To date, there have been no studies outside of prospective clinical trials examining the efficacy and safety of BV+AVD for newly diagnosed advanced cHL in patients aged 18-59 years. In this study, involving 3 Italian oncology centers dedicated to the care of HL, we aim to examine a cohort of YP&A with stage III-IV cHL with a median follow-up of two years after first-line treatment with BV+AVD, with the aim of understanding the outcome and specific side effects in a real-life experience.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Naples, Italy, 80131
        • Federico II University,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

19-60 year old c-HL patients, previously untreated with Ann Arbor stage III or IV. ECOG PS 0-3, GLS ≥-20% at echocardiographic assessment and human immunodeficiency virus negativity.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histological diagnosis of previously untreated c-HL
  • stage III or IV at diagnosis
  • treatment with at least one cycle of therapy according to the Brentuximab Vedotin + AVD regimen
  • age between 18 and 59 years
  • ECOG at diagnosis: PS 0-3
  • negative HIV test
  • follow up from the end of treatment >24 months All diagnoses are made according to the WHO classification of Lymphomas.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min at diagnosis
  • transaminase >3 ULN at diagnosis
  • absolute neutrophil count >500/mmc at diagnosis
  • hemoglobin concentrations <9 g/dL at diagnosis
  • platelet count <75000/mmc at diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2025
The primary endpoint was the activity of the Brentuximab Vedotin- based front-line strategy in terms of OS.
from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2025

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2025
Progression free survival
from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2025
adverse events
Time Frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2025
grade >3 adverse events
from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2025

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

Subscribe