Experience in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Sirolimus Drug-Coated Balloon and Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon

August 18, 2025 updated by: Andres Iñiguez Romo

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with a significant burden in low- and middle-income countries. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often the first clinical manifestation of CVD, representing a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Global variations exist in revascularization rates and long-term mortality following ACS. It is estimated that 12% of disability-adjusted life years are lost annually due to CVD. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) constitute a promising technology to overcome few disadvantages of current latest generation of drug-eluting stents (DES). The safety of these devices has been proven previously. However, there is few data regarding its efficacy in a broad spectrum of clinical setting and patient population.

Hypothesis:

The sirolimus-coated drug-eluting balloon demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy to the paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients undergoing angioplasty for coronary artery disease.

Primary Objective:

To assess the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel- vs. sirolimus-coated drug-eluting balloon over 12 months in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for in-stent restenosis or small-vessel stenosis.

Secondary Objectives:

To compare the efficacy (freedom from target vessel failure) of both balloons at 12 months.

To evaluate the safety of paclitaxel- vs. sirolimus-coated balloon in coronary revascularization at 12 months.

Study Design:

Study Type: Prospective, single-center, analytical cohort study.

Population: Patients undergoing angioplasty with paclitaxel- or sirolimus-coated drug-eluting balloons according to standard clinical practice.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with De novo lesion and in stent reestenosis.

Study Period: From September 2021 to September 2026 or until the required sample size is achieved.

Study Importance:

This study will provide comparative evidence on the use of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated DCBs in coronary revascularization. The findings may contribute to future clinical recommendations for the optimal use of DCBs in patients with coronary artery disease.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

479

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pontevedra
      • Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain, 36312

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with coronary artery disease eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention with a balloon

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with De novo lesion and in stent reestenosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is not a candidate for balloon treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Sirolimus-Coated Balloon
Patients with coronary artery disease treated with Sirolimus-Coated Balloon
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon
Patients with coronary artery disease treated with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target lesions revascularization
Time Frame: 5 years
Rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of the target lesion due to symptoms or objective evidence of ischemia
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 5 years
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at 5 years, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and clinically driven lesion revascularization. Each event will be independently adjudicated by a clinical events committee.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Victor A Jimenez Diaz, MD, MPH, Servicio Galego de Saude. Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
  • Study Chair: Andres Iñiguez Romo, MD, PhD, Servicio Galego de Saude. Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Deidentified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and for a period of 5 years. Availability beyond this period will be considered upon request.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may request access to the deidentified IPD and supporting information for scientifically sound proposals. Access will be granted after approval by the principal investigator and the signing of a data use agreement. Data will be shared via secure transfer.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)

Subscribe