- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06867783
EVALUATION for YOUNG CHILDREN with AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS (coquille)
EVALUATION of EARLY FAMILY and MULTIFAMILY INTERVENTION for YOUNG CHILDREN with AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Early intervention in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is now considered a priority. An approach that targets both child disorders and parental distress, and supports the skills of parents, is desirable. Yet there is no early intervention by the ASD involving parents and targeting both child functioning and parenting skills specifically.
Our objective is to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively the collaborative family support system for ASD "Coquille". This scheme combines the development of a personalized care project based on parents' priorities, an intensive single-family parent-child follow-up and a group of multi-family therapy , over a total period of 6 months. Our main hypothesis is the significant decrease in behavioral disorders of children, evaluated by CARS, following the Coquille device. Our secondary hypotheses concern the evolution of parental dimensions following the device (sense of coherence, parental skills, parental stress, coping strategies and social support). We assume that these dimensions will change as a result of the scheme, and that they will be maintained in the medium term, six months after Coquille. A semi-structured interview will qualitatively explore the dimensions related to family resources, before and after the follow-up and in the medium term. This will also allow the mother to collect experience of the device.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Neuilly-sur-Marne, France, 93330
- EPS Ville Evrard
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria for the mother and the child:
- Age 18 years and over
- French language spoken and written by the parent
- Free and informed consent form , initialled and signed by the parent
- Child under 30 months of age at time of inclusion, diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder
- Total CARS score greater than or equal to 30
- Free and informed consent form, initialled and signed by legal representatives
Exclusion Criteria for the mother only:
- Any acute, somatic or psychiatric clinical condition of the mother not compatible with therapeutic intervention.
- Current engagement in an interventional research protocol
- Mother under protection of justice, guardianship or enhanced curatorship
- Mother no longer having parental authority
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: coquille device
collaborative family support scheme aimed at improving family functioning and child behaviour
|
Modalities: Elaboration of the personalized care project, follow-up parents-child single family, multi-family therapy (MFT). Frequency: MFT weekly, bi-familial observation weekly for one month, single-parent child-parent monitoring weekly for five months, MFT father-child bimonthly for six months, three co-parents, three child psychiatric consultations to develop the personalized collaborative care project |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Childhood Autism Rating, Scale, CARS
Time Frame: It is done before the sign of the consent (T-1),
|
CARS works by rating your child's behavior, characteristics, and abilities against the expected developmental growth of a typical child.It is done by your primary healthcare provider, a teacher, or a parent by rating the child's behaviors from 1 to 4. 1 being normal for your child's age, 2 for mildly abnormal, 3 for moderately abnormal, and 4 as severely abnormal.
Scores range from 15 to 60 with 30 being the cutoff rate for a diagnosis of mild autism.
Scores 30-37 indicate mild to moderate autism, while scores between 38 and 60 are characterized as severe autism.
|
It is done before the sign of the consent (T-1),
|
|
Childhood Autism Rating, Scale, CARS
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
CARS works by rating your child's behavior, characteristics, and abilities against the expected developmental growth of a typical child.It is done by your primary healthcare provider, a teacher, or a parent by rating the child's behaviors from 1 to 4. 1 being normal for your child's age, 2 for mildly abnormal, 3 for moderately abnormal, and 4 as severely abnormal.
Scores range from 15 to 60 with 30 being the cutoff rate for a diagnosis of mild autism.
Scores 30-37 indicate mild to moderate autism, while scores between 38 and 60 are characterized as severe autism.
|
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Childhood Autism Rating, Scale, CARS
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
CARS works by rating your child's behavior, characteristics, and abilities against the expected developmental growth of a typical child.It is done by your primary healthcare provider, a teacher, or a parent by rating the child's behaviors from 1 to 4. 1 being normal for your child's age, 2 for mildly abnormal, 3 for moderately abnormal, and 4 as severely abnormal.
Scores range from 15 to 60 with 30 being the cutoff rate for a diagnosis of mild autism.
Scores 30-37 indicate mild to moderate autism, while scores between 38 and 60 are characterized as severe autism.
|
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
Sociodemographic and lifestyle
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The socio-demographic questionnaire contains 4 items: Socio-demographic criteria (gender, date of birth, level of education, marital status and number of children), diet, screen, and sleep. |
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
Sociodemographic and lifestyle
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The socio-demographic questionnaire contains 4 items: Socio-demographic criteria (gender, date of birth, level of education, marital status and number of children), diet, screen, and sleep. |
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Sociodemographic and lifestyle
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The socio-demographic questionnaire contains 4 items: Socio-demographic criteria (gender, date of birth, level of education, marital status and number of children), diet, screen, and sleep. |
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) was created in 1995 to measure stress unique to parenting and captures both the joys and demands of parenting. Each following sentences describe feelings and perceptions that relate to the experience of being a parent. The PSS is brief and can be completed in less than 10 minutes. It is an 18-item self-report measure in which parents respond to statements about their typical relationship with their child. The possible range of the PSS is 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree to each of the 18 statements. Responses are scored as follows:Strongly disagree = 1,Disagree = 2, Undecided = 3, Agree = 4, Strongly agree = 5 |
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) was created in 1995 to measure stress unique to parenting and captures both the joys and demands of parenting. Each following sentences describe feelings and perceptions that relate to the experience of being a parent. The PSS is brief and can be completed in less than 10 minutes. It is an 18-item self-report measure in which parents respond to statements about their typical relationship with their child. The possible range of the PSS is 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree to each of the 18 statements. Responses are scored as follows:Strongly disagree = 1,Disagree = 2, Undecided = 3, Agree = 4, Strongly agree = 5 |
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) was created in 1995 to measure stress unique to parenting and captures both the joys and demands of parenting. Each following sentences describe feelings and perceptions that relate to the experience of being a parent. The PSS is brief and can be completed in less than 10 minutes. It is an 18-item self-report measure in which parents respond to statements about their typical relationship with their child. The possible range of the PSS is 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree to each of the 18 statements. Responses are scored as follows:Strongly disagree = 1,Disagree = 2, Undecided = 3, Agree = 4, Strongly agree = 5 |
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
Ways of Coping Checklist
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) is a checklist of 68 items describing a broad range of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies that an individ- ual might use in a specific stressful episode.They include items from the domains of defensive coping (e.g., avoidance, intellectualization, isolation, suppression), information-seeking, problem- solving, palliation, inhibition of action, direct action, and magical thinking.
The checklist is binary, yes or no, and is always answered with a specific stressful event in mind.
The items on the WCCL were classified into two categories: problem- focused and emotion-focused.
|
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
Ways of Coping Checklist
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) is a checklist of 68 items describing a broad range of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies that an individ- ual might use in a specific stressful episode.They include items from the domains of defensive coping (e.g., avoidance, intellectualization, isolation, suppression), information-seeking, problem- solving, palliation, inhibition of action, direct action, and magical thinking.
The checklist is binary, yes or no, and is always answered with a specific stressful event in mind.
The items on the WCCL were classified into two categories: problem- focused and emotion-focused.
|
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Ways of Coping Checklist
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) is a checklist of 68 items describing a broad range of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies that an individ- ual might use in a specific stressful episode.They include items from the domains of defensive coping (e.g., avoidance, intellectualization, isolation, suppression), information-seeking, problem- solving, palliation, inhibition of action, direct action, and magical thinking.
The checklist is binary, yes or no, and is always answered with a specific stressful event in mind.
The items on the WCCL were classified into two categories: problem- focused and emotion-focused.
|
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
sense of coherence scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale evaluates how people perceive life and identifies how they use their resources of resistance to maintain and develop their health.This scale is written by Antonovsky in 1987.
There is 13 items.
For eachs items, you have to choose between Never, rarely, often, frequently and always.
|
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
sense of coherence scale
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale evaluates how people perceive life and identifies how they use their resources of resistance to maintain and develop their health.This scale is written by Antonovsky in 1987.
There is 13 items.
For eachs items, you have to choose between Never, rarely, often, frequently and always.
|
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
sense of coherence scale
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale evaluates how people perceive life and identifies how they use their resources of resistance to maintain and develop their health.This scale is written by Antonovsky in 1987.
There is 13 items.
For eachs items, you have to choose between Never, rarely, often, frequently and always.
|
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
Parent Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The Parenting Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC) was developed by Gibaud-Wallston as part of her PhD dissertation and presented at the American Psychological Association by Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman in 1978. The PSOC is a 17 item scale, with 2 subscales. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". Nine (9) items (#s 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 16) on the PSOC are reverse coded. |
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
Parent Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The Parenting Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC) was developed by Gibaud-Wallston as part of her PhD dissertation and presented at the American Psychological Association by Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman in 1978. The PSOC is a 17 item scale, with 2 subscales. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". Nine (9) items (#s 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 16) on the PSOC are reverse coded. |
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Parent Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The Parenting Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC) was developed by Gibaud-Wallston as part of her PhD dissertation and presented at the American Psychological Association by Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman in 1978. The PSOC is a 17 item scale, with 2 subscales. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". Nine (9) items (#s 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 16) on the PSOC are reverse coded. |
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others.
|
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others.
|
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others.
|
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS)
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The social desirability scale is a 33-items self-report questionnaire that assesses whether or not respondents are concerned with social approval.
The scale was created by Douglas P. Crowne and David Marlowe in 1960 in an effort to measure social desirability bias, which is considered one of the most common biases affecting survey research.A high number of socially desirable responses might indicate that the respondent is generally concerned with social approval and conforming to societal conventions, while a low score might indicate that the respondent is less concerned with such things and is more willing to answer survey questions truthfully and representing themselves accurately.
|
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS)
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The social desirability scale is a 33-items self-report questionnaire that assesses whether or not respondents are concerned with social approval.
The scale was created by Douglas P. Crowne and David Marlowe in 1960 in an effort to measure social desirability bias, which is considered one of the most common biases affecting survey research.A high number of socially desirable responses might indicate that the respondent is generally concerned with social approval and conforming to societal conventions, while a low score might indicate that the respondent is less concerned with such things and is more willing to answer survey questions truthfully and representing themselves accurately.
|
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS)
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The social desirability scale is a 33-items self-report questionnaire that assesses whether or not respondents are concerned with social approval.
The scale was created by Douglas P. Crowne and David Marlowe in 1960 in an effort to measure social desirability bias, which is considered one of the most common biases affecting survey research.A high number of socially desirable responses might indicate that the respondent is generally concerned with social approval and conforming to societal conventions, while a low score might indicate that the respondent is less concerned with such things and is more willing to answer survey questions truthfully and representing themselves accurately.
|
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
Time Frame: Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist consists of 58 questions across 5 different domains: (a) irritability, (b) social withdrawal, (c) stereotypic behavior, (d) hyperactivity/noncompliance, and (e) inappropriate speech.
The rater has to answer each of the 58 questions using a 4-point Likert scale.
A score of a "0" means the behavior is not a problem, a score of a "1" means slight problem, a score of a "2" means a serious problem, and a "3" means a severe problem.
|
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
|
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
Time Frame: Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist consists of 58 questions across 5 different domains: (a) irritability, (b) social withdrawal, (c) stereotypic behavior, (d) hyperactivity/noncompliance, and (e) inappropriate speech.
The rater has to answer each of the 58 questions using a 4-point Likert scale.
A score of a "0" means the behavior is not a problem, a score of a "1" means slight problem, a score of a "2" means a serious problem, and a "3" means a severe problem.
|
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
|
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
Time Frame: Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist consists of 58 questions across 5 different domains: (a) irritability, (b) social withdrawal, (c) stereotypic behavior, (d) hyperactivity/noncompliance, and (e) inappropriate speech.
The rater has to answer each of the 58 questions using a 4-point Likert scale.
A score of a "0" means the behavior is not a problem, a score of a "1" means slight problem, a score of a "2" means a serious problem, and a "3" means a severe problem.
|
Six month after the follow up (T2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pierre LECARPENTIER, MBBS, EPS Ville Evrard
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 10477M-COQUILLE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder
-
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo...Istituto Clinico HumanitasRecruitingAutism | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) | Autism DisorderItaly
-
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University...Not yet recruitingAutism | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)China
-
Poznan University of Physical EducationCompletedAutism | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)Poland
-
Greater Atlanta Integrative PediatricsRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autism | ASD | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)United States
-
Adia Med of Winter Park LLCRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autism | ASD | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)United States
-
Blinklab LimitedRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autism | Neurodevelopmental Conditions | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)United States
-
Poznan University of Physical EducationNational Science Centre, PolandCompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | ASD | Autism Spectrum Disorder High-Functioning | Autism SpectrumPoland
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalCompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) | Autism Spectrum Disorder High-FunctioningTaiwan
-
Stanford UniversityJohn and Marcia Goldman FoundationNot yet recruitingAutism | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)United States
-
Stanford UniversityCalifornia Department of Developmental ServicesActive, not recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autistic Disorder | Autism | Autism Spectrum Disorders | Autistic Disorders Spectrum | Autistic Spectrum Disorder | Autistic Spectrum DisordersUnited States