Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Care Transitions (REDDCAT2)

March 20, 2026 updated by: Suzanne Mitchell, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Care Transitions: Screening and Addressing Social Determinants of Health Needs at Hospital Discharge

The goal of this project is to test a novel bedside SDOH screening intervention coupled with post-discharge navigation for hospitalized patients with a diabetes diagnosis to reduce unmet social needs, compared to usual care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators are conducting this research to test a computer-based screening tool and a care coordination protocol to help people with type 2 diabetes who report unmet social determinants of health.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the conditions in the environments where people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks. - Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Examples of SDOH include factors such as housing, transportation, education, job opportunities, income, and access to healthy food, clean air and water, and health care services. Participants who join this research will be asked to complete a screening survey about their health. Then, participants will be randomly assigned (like pulling a name out of a hat) to one of two groups:

  • Those in Group 1 will be partnered with a patient navigator whose role will be to review the results of the screening survey and help coordinate care before leaving the hospital and for 90 days after.
  • Those in Group 2 will receive treatment as usual. A list of community-based resources will be provided.

Participants in both groups will complete surveys at the beginning of the study and again at 30 and 90 days after leaving the hospital. The investigators will make reminder calls to participants in both groups about data collection and will collect information from the medical record for as long as 90 days after leaving the hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

412

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult aged 18 years or older
  • diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
  • hospitalized at Univ of Massachusetts-affiliated hospital
  • endorsed at least 1 unmet social need via screening survey

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • discharge to short or long-term nursing facility or hospital
  • medical contraindication
  • cognitive impairment
  • unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
Treatment as usual (TAU)

TAU participants will receive standard care from the UMass Memorial Healthcare (UMMH) hospitalist team as appropriate. Participants will receive a printed list of community resources. No study-related patient navigation support will be provided.

In 2024, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandated social determinants of health (SDOH) screening for inpatients. UMMH will use a checklist social needs screener. It will be up to the hospitalist teams to act on SDOH screening results. The UMMH hospitalist teams may consult endocrinology and/or inpatient social services to provide support and consultation for all patients regardless of study participation or group assignment. If medically appropriate, the endocrinology service may manage medications and provide referrals for continued treatment post discharge. All services that are normally provided by hospital care teams will remain available.

Experimental: Intervention
REDDCAT2 Intervention
Those in the REDDCAT2 intervention group will be partnered with a patient navigator whose role will be to review the results of the screening survey completed at the beginning of the study. The patient navigator will help coordinate the participant's care before leaving the hospital and for 90 days after. Together, the participant and navigator will form an action plan intended to help address personal, social, or community factors affecting the participant's health. The navigator is expected to contact the participant every 2 weeks, though this can be adjusted based on their preference.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to hospital service use post-discharge
Time Frame: 90 days
The primary outcome is a composite measure on all types of hospital service use (emergency department, observation, or hospital readmissions), pre-specified as time-to-hospital reutilization, at 90-days post-hospital discharge. Source of the data are UMMH electronic health records and participant self-report.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in weight/body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Change in weight/BMI per electronic health record or Research Assistant assessment
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Pain Management
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Change in Pain and Pain interference scores assessed using two measures from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

  1. Pain Severity is scored using a T-score ranging from 20 to 80. T-scores that are 1 or more standard deviations above average are indicative of a poorer outcome (more pain).
  2. Pain Interference, which is a T-score ranging from 20 to 80. T-scores that are 1+ standard deviations above average are indicative of a poorer outcome (more problems with pain hindering activities).

PROMIS scores have an average of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population.

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Illness Burden perception
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Change in experience of Illness Burden. Illness burden scale generates a T-score, ranging from 20 to 80. The average score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. T-scores that are 1 or more standard deviations above average are indicative of a poorer outcome (indicate more illness burden).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Substance Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Change in Substance Use will be assessed using a validated measure from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS scores have an average of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population.

PROMIS Substance Use - Resulting scores are on a T-score metric ranging from 20 to 80. Scores that are 1 or more standard deviations above average are indicative of poor, self-reported health (greater severity of substance use).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Alcohol Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Change in Alcohol Use will be assessed using a validated measure from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS scores have an average of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population.

PROMIS Alcohol Use: Resulting scores are on a T-score metric ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores are indicative of poor self-reported health (more alcohol consumption, cravings, or difficulty controlling drinking).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Diabetes Stigma
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale or DSAS-2 is a 19-item measure with three sub-scales: Treated Differently, Blame and Judgement, Self-Stigma. A total scale score can also be calculated. Items are scored 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (more perceived diabetes stigma).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Economic Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in 8-item custom short form from the Economic Quality of Life item bank. Items are related to finances and affordability of living expenses and range from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Resulting scores are on a T-score metric, ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate better economic quality of life.
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Changes in depressive symptom burden are assessed using a measure from the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQOL) measurement system.

Neuro-QoL Depression - Resulting scores are on a T-score metric, ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate poorer self-reported health (a greater presence of depressive symptoms).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Changes in anxiety symptom burden are assessed using a measure from the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQOL) measurement system.

Neuro-QoL Anxiety - Resulting scores are on a T-score metric, ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate poorer self-reported health (a greater presence of anxiety symptoms).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Emotional Support
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Changes in emotional support scores assessed using measures from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Resulting scores are on a T-score metric, ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate worse outcome (a greater degree of social isolation).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Health Seeking Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Health Seeking Behavior scale, which includes 21 items including subscales related to Primary Care Provider, General, Family/Personal Friends, and Internet. Resulting scores are on a T metric, ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate a positive outcome (more health-seeking behavior).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Perceived Competence
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Change in Perceived Competence in Diabetes Scale (PCDS) score - items are rated on a scale 1-7. Higher total scores indicate better self-reported health (a greater perceived ability to manage diabetes).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Perceived diabetes self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Change in Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) score - items are rated on a scale of 0-10 and summed for a total score. Higher total scores indicate better self-reported health (self-efficacy in managing diabetes).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Coping Skills
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Brief Resilient Coping Scale scores. Items are rated 1 ("does not describe me at all") to 5 ("describes me very well") and summed for a total score. Higher scores indicate better self-reported health (higher coping resiliency).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Diabetes Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Change in Diabetes Knowledge and diabetes self-care will be assessed using the 23-item Revised Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2). DTK2 contains multiple choice questions to assess knowledge, and each question contains 4 responses for the respondent to choose from. Proportion of correct answers over total questions determine scoring.
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Housing Insecurity
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Change in Housing Insecurity scores, which is a 22-item assessment to evaluate affordability, safety, and home features. Resulting scores use a T-score metric, ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores indicate poorer outcomes (more significant concerns with housing stability).
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Quantity of unmet social needs
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Absolute change in total number of SDOH domains identified with an unmet need (i.e., food insecurity, housing insecurity, etc.) as reported on Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) screening tool.
Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Glucose Control: HbA1c at point of care
Time Frame: Baseline and 90 days
Change in HbA1c values recorded from point-of-care tests or in the electronic health record at visits.
Baseline and 90 days
changes in Diabetes Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

The Diabetes Distress Scale is a 17-item self-report instrument. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale from (1) "not a problem" to (6) "a very significant problem." The scale yields an overall distress score based on the average responses on the 1-6 scale for all 17 items. The scale also yields a score for each of 4 subscales based on the average response on the 1-6 scale on all of the items in that scale.

An average score of < 2.0 = reflects little or no distress, an average score between 2.0 and 2.9 = reflects moderate distress, and an average score > 3.0 = reflects high distress.

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Time to hospital service use post-discharge
Time Frame: 30 days
Time-to-hospital reutilization (defined as any type of hospital service use, e.g., emergency department, observation, or hospital readmissions), at 30-days post-hospital discharge. Source of the data are UMMH electronic health records and participant self-report.
30 days
Changes in Self-Management Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Change in patient-reported adherence to diabetes regimen from baseline to follow up assessed by administering the Changes in the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Assessment (SDSCA) & Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) for Medication Adherence.

SDSCA - Scores are calculated for each of the five regimen areas assessed: Diet, Exercise, Blood-Glucose Testing, Foot Care, and Smoking Status.

REDD-CAT Medication Adherence scale is measured using T-scores. Scores greater that 1 standard deviation of 10.0 away from the mean of 50.0 represent a greater or lesser degree of adherence, depending on direction. Higher scores are indicative of a positive outcome (more adherence).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days
Changes in Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Medication Adherence scores assessed by administering the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) for Medication Adherence scale.

This is measured using T-scores. Scores greater that 1 standard deviation of 10.0 away from the mean of 50.0 reflect a greater or lesser degree of adherence, depending on direction. Higher scores are indicative of a positive outcome (more adherence).

Baseline, 30, and 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This is a clinical trial. We plan to share data in aggregate according to our data management sharing plan. Sharing individual-level data is beyond the scope of this study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual (TAU)

Subscribe