Early Versus Delayed Rehabilitation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture

May 23, 2025 updated by: Seth Yarboro, MD, University of Virginia

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Versus Delayed Rehabilitation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture

Proximal humerus fractures can be a debilitating injury in the elderly, impacting the ability to function independently or complete activities of daily living due to pain and restricted shoulder motion. Evidence has shown that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an effective option to improve pain and function for patients with acute displaced proximal humerus fractures. Given that patients undergoing rTSA for proximal humerus fractures typically experience worse functional outcomes, worse patient-reported outcomes, and higher rates of complication compared to those with elective indications for surgical intervention, it is critical to determine a secure path to recovery for these patients after surgery. Early rehabilitation has been proposed to be safe and effective for patients who undergo rTSA for elective indications; however, there is a paucity of research evaluating safety and effectiveness of timing of rehabilitation for rTSA patients in the trauma setting. Currently, there exists a great variability in postoperative rehabilitation protocols across orthopaedic practices. This study's objective is to determine the safety and effectiveness of early postoperative rehabilitation on the outcomes and postoperative complications of patients undergoing rTSA for proximal humerus fractures in order to provide more specific recommendations for this patient population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overarching goal is to better understand the impact of timing of initiation of rehabilitation on functional and patient reported outcomes on patients undergoing rTSA in the trauma setting.

Specifically, the investigators will conduct a pilot study in the form of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether, in patients undergoing rTSA for proximal humerus fracture, early rehabilitation yields a significant difference in range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, or postoperative complications compared to those who undergo delayed rehabilitation. The specific aims are:

Aim 1: To compare the range of motion and patient reported outcomes between early and delayed rehabilitation in patients undergoing rTSA for proximal humerus fracture by conducting a randomized trial. The investigators will enroll patients in a randomized controlled trial postoperatively that will allocate patients to begin physical rehabilitation early (two weeks after operation) or delayed (six weeks after operation). In-person clinic visits and radiographs will occur at multiple time points (six weeks, three months, and six months) postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that patients undergoing rTSA for proximal humerus fracture participating in early rehabilitation will have no difference in range of motion (forward flexion, abduction) or patient reported outcomes American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score Constant score.

Aim 2: To compare the rates of postoperative complications between early and delayed rehabilitation in patients undergoing rTSA for proximal humerus fracture. Investigators will conduct chart reviews as well as in-person clinic visits and radiographs at multiple time points postoperatively. Investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in rates of postoperative complications between early and delayed rehabilitation groups.

The expected outcome of this study is an enhanced understanding of the impact of rehabilitation after proximal humerus fracture, and the degree to which timing of initiation of therapy impacts patient outcomes. This will have a positive impact because it creates a foundation for developing rehabilitation protocols in this population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 50-85 undergo reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty by a single surgeon for proximal humerus fractures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous rTSA to ipsilateral shoulder
  • undergoing elective rTSA
  • Prisoners
  • unwilling to be randomized
  • unwilling or unable to attend follow up visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Early Onset Physical Therapy
Patients in this arm will begin post operative physical therapy at 2 weeks after procedure.
Subjects will begin physical therapy at either 2 or 6 weeks s/p a rTSA.
Active Comparator: Delayed Onset Physical Therapy
Patients in this arm will begin post operative physical therapy at 6 weeks after procedure.
Subjects will begin physical therapy at either 2 or 6 weeks s/p a rTSA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of Range of motion of shoulder Forward Flexion using a goniometer
Time Frame: 2 week, 6 week, 3 month, and 6 month
A goniometer will be used to measure forward flexion of the shoulder.
2 week, 6 week, 3 month, and 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seth Yarboro, MD, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSR301914
  • FOT Grant ID 9024-2 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Foundation for Orthopaedic Trauma)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthopedic Disorder

Clinical Trials on Physical Therapy

Subscribe