Validation of Five Seasons Sleep Tracking Mat for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

April 15, 2025 updated by: Weijun Huang, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
This study will evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of the Five Seasons Sleep Tracking Mat with the gold standard, polysomnography.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Given that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) imposes a heavy disease burden, conducting effective public screening is regarded as a crucial step in health management and chronic disease prevention. Currently, the diagnosis of OSA relies on polysomnography (PSG) and manual scoring, which are constrained by equipment availability and personnel shortages, resulting in low efficiency, high costs, and scheduling difficulties. Additionally, PSG monitoring requires numerous contact-based sensors, leading to poor patient compliance. The lack of large-scale screening and long-term follow-up further restricts the implementation of standardized and evidence-based treatments. Developing new, effective, low- or zero-burden sleep monitoring devices to minimize sleep disruption while ensuring monitoring accuracy is, therefore, a key direction for future research.

The Five Seasons Sleep Tracking Mat (5S Sleep Tracking Mat) detects heartbeats, respiration, body movements, and snoring using ballistocardiogram (BCG) signals. The device is composed primarily of a control unit, monitoring mat, temperature/humidity sensor, power adapter, and light sensor. During operation, the device accurately captures the impact force of bodily movements at a high sampling rate of 2 kHz. It then uses proprietary signal processing and pre-trained AI models to extract heartbeat and respiratory waveforms, as well as body movements. Additionally, it automatically detects respiratory events, calculates the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and determines sleep stages. Since the monitoring mat only needs to be placed under the pillow without requiring direct contact with the body or wearable accessories, it is particularly suitable for home-based, long-term daily sleep monitoring.

In this study, researchers will use the current gold standard, PSG, as a reference to validate the Five Seasons Sleep Tracking Mat for sleep monitoring and OSA-assisted diagnosis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai sixth people's hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Age between 18 and 70 years, with potential symptoms of snoring at night, daytime sleepiness, or self-reported poor sleep quality, suspected of having OSA, recruited by department of otorhinolaryncology in collaborative hospitals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants between 18 and 70 years, with potential symptoms of snoring at night, daytime sleepiness, or self-reported poor sleep quality, suspected of having OSA.
  • Participants who are willing to undergo overnight PSG.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with presence of severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, or significant impairment of liver, kidney, or lung function.
  • Participants with concurrent unstable respiratory diseases or other acute-phase respiratory illnesses.
  • Participants using, at long term or currently, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, sedatives, or other medications that may affect sleep.
  • Participants undergoing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy or other sleep-related treatments on the study night.
  • Participants coexisting insomnia, parasomnia, or other sleep disorders.
  • Participants with psychiatric disorders.
  • Participants refusing to sign the informed consent form.
  • Participants unable to cooperate with the required examinations.
  • Participants with any other conditions deemed unsuitable for inclusion by the investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic sensitivity (AHI = 5) of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat compared to PSG
Time Frame: Day 1
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 5 events per hour according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat in participants with AHI ≥ 5 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Day 1
Diagnostic specificity (AHI = 5) of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat compared to PSG
Time Frame: Day 1
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 5 events per hour according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat in participants with AHI ≥ 5 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic sensitivity (AHI = 15) of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat compared to PSG
Time Frame: Day 1
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 15 events per hour according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat in participants with AHI ≥ 15 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Day 1
Diagnostic specificity (AHI = 30) of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat compared to PSG
Time Frame: Day 1
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 30 events per hour according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat in participants with AHI ≥ 30 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Day 1
Diagnostic sensitivity (AHI = 30) of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat compared to PSG
Time Frame: Day 1
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 30 events per hour according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat in participants with AHI ≥ 30 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Day 1
Overall accuracy of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat at AHI = 5
Time Frame: Day 1
Using an AHI threshold of 5 for true positive and true negative classification, the overall accuracy is the percentage of total cases correctly classified.
Day 1
Overall accuracy of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat at AHI = 15
Time Frame: Day 1
Using an AHI threshold of 15 for true positive and true negative classification, the overall accuracy is the percentage of total cases correctly classified.
Day 1
Overall accuracy of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat at AHI = 30
Time Frame: Day 1
Using an AHI threshold of 30 for true positive and true negative classification, the overall accuracy is the percentage of total cases correctly classified.
Day 1
Cohen's kappa of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat at AHI = 5
Time Frame: Day 1
Using an AHI threshold of 5 for determining true positive or true negative results, Cohen's kappa (κ) is the ratio of the difference between the observed agreement (Pa) and the expected agreement (Pe) to the maximum possible difference. When κ=1, the sleep mat's diagnosis perfectly matches the PSG diagnosis. When κ=0, the agreement is entirely due to random effects. When κ<0, the sleep mat's diagnosis is completely inconsistent with the PSG diagnosis.
Day 1
Cohen's kappa of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat at AHI = 15
Time Frame: Day 1
Using an AHI threshold of 15 for determining true positive or true negative results, Cohen's kappa (κ) is the ratio of the difference between the observed agreement (Pa) and the expected agreement (Pe) to the maximum possible difference. When κ=1, the sleep mat's diagnosis perfectly matches the PSG diagnosis. When κ=0, the agreement is entirely due to random effects. When κ<0, the sleep mat's diagnosis is completely inconsistent with the PSG diagnosis.
Day 1
Cohen's kappa of 5S Sleep Tracking Mat at AHI = 30
Time Frame: Day 1
Using an AHI threshold of 30 for determining true positive or true negative results, Cohen's kappa (κ) is the ratio of the difference between the observed agreement (Pa) and the expected agreement (Pe) to the maximum possible difference. When κ=1, the sleep mat's diagnosis perfectly matches the PSG diagnosis. When κ=0, the agreement is entirely due to random effects. When κ<0, the sleep mat's diagnosis is completely inconsistent with the PSG diagnosis.
Day 1
Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) at AHI = 5.
Time Frame: Day 1
The ROC of the 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be drawn based on PSG diagnostic results. The 95% confidence interval of the AUC will be calculated using model-based estimation, with true positive/negative results determined with an AHI threshold of 5.
Day 1
Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) at AHI = 15.
Time Frame: Day 1
The ROC of the 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be drawn based on PSG diagnostic results. The 95% confidence interval of the AUC will be calculated using model-based estimation, with true positive/negative results determined with an AHI threshold of 15.
Day 1
Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) at AHI = 30.
Time Frame: Day 1
The ROC of the 5S Sleep Tracking Mat will be drawn based on PSG diagnostic results. The 95% confidence interval of the AUC will be calculated using model-based estimation, with true positive/negative results determined with an AHI threshold of 30.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the AHI according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the AHI according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Total Sleep Time (TST)
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the TST according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Sleep Latency (SL)
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the SL according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the SL according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the WASO according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the WASO according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the proportion of the stage 1 and 2 of Non Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the proportion of the stage 1 and 2 of NREM sleep according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the proportion of the stage 1 and 2 of NREM sleep according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the proportion of the stage 3 of Non Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the proportion of the stage 3 of NREM sleep according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the proportion of the stage 3 of NREM sleep according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the proportion of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep
Time Frame: Day 1
ICC between the proportion of REM sleep according to 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and the proportion of REM sleep according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of AHI according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of Total Sleep Time (TST)
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of TST according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of Sleep Latency (SL)
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of SL according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of WASO according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of the proportion of the stage 1 and 2 of Non Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of the proportion of the stage 1 and 2 of NREM sleep according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of the proportion of the stage 3 of Non Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of the proportion of the stage 3 of NREM sleep according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) of the proportion of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep
Time Frame: Day 1
The mean and difference of the proportion of REM sleep according to both 5S Sleep Tracking Mat and PSG are analyzed from the raw data. The Bland-Altman plot is created with the mean on the x-axis and the difference on the y-axis. The mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are calculated based on the plot which must fall within the clinically accepted threshold range.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Clinical Trials on Five Seasons [5S] Sleep Tracking Mat

Subscribe