"Acrylic Vs. Metal Palatal Coverage in Complete Dentures: Patient-Reported Outcomes"

March 11, 2025 updated by: Motasum Abu-Awwad, University of Jordan

Complete Denture Palatal Material Impact on Patients' Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

Conventional dentures can be uncomfortable and limit oral functionality due to the polished surfaces covering the palate and rugae areas. A randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted to compare patients' satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life when using dentures with an acrylic or metal palate. The study aimed to determine whether an acrylic palate would provide better sensory feedback and improved oral function. Participants wore each denture and completed a questionnaire. The study's results have implications for the design of complete dentures, as they highlight the importance of considering patient experiences and feedback when selecting materials. By prioritizing patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life, dental professionals can enhance denture treatments' effectiveness and improve patients' quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Conventional dentures have long been criticized for their discomfort and limitations in oral functionality, primarily attributed to the polished surfaces covering the palate and rugae areas. To address these concerns, a rigorous randomized crossover clinical trial was meticulously conducted to compare the subjective experiences of patients wearing dentures with either an acrylic or metal palate.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life while wearing dentures with different palate materials. Specifically, researchers sought to ascertain whether the use of an acrylic palate could offer superior sensory feedback and enhance overall oral function compared to traditional metal palates.

Participants enrolled in the study were required to wear both types of dentures consecutively and subsequently complete a comprehensive questionnaire designed to capture their subjective experiences and perceptions. The questionnaire encompassed various aspects, including comfort, ease of speech, ability to chew and swallow, and overall satisfaction with the dentures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amman, Jordan, 11942
        • University of Jordan hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Eligibility Minimum Age: 45 Years Maximum Age: 80 Years Sex: All Gender-Based Inclusion: No Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes (if completely edentolous)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients seeking a set of conventional maxillary and mandibular complete dentures at the University of Jordan Hospital, either for the first time or as a replacement for previous dentures
  • Patients aged between 45 and 80 years old
  • Completely edentulous for at least 3 months
  • Patients who approved and consented to participation

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with severe underlying medical conditions, including: Neuromuscular dysfunction, Auditory problems, Mental conditions, Oral pathology, Xerostomia, Tied tongue condition

- Patients who met the inclusion criteria but failed to sign a consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acrylic palate complete denture
Participants will receive maxillary complete dentures with an acrylic palate
Complete denture with a metallic Co-Cr casted palatal material
Other Names:
  • Complete denture with an acrylic palate
Experimental: Metal palate complete denture
Participants will receive maxillary complete dentures with a metal palate
Complete denture with an acrylic palatal material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their dentures
Time Frame: 60 days
Patients overall satisfaction rate using visual analogue scale (a measurement instrument represented in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (satisfied and unsatisfied). Orientated from the left 'best' to the right 'worst').
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients reported oral health related quality of life
Time Frame: 60 days
Patients reported oral health related quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Patients (OHIP-EDENT) Questionnaire; The OHIP-EDENT index has 20 items and uses a 0-5 scale where 0 is never and 5 is always. The minimum overall score can be 20 and maximum 100.
60 days
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their dentures during speaking.
Time Frame: 60 days
Patients overall satisfaction rate during speaking using visual analogue scale (a measurement instrument represented in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (satisfied and unsatisfied). Orientated from the left 'best' to the right 'worst').
60 days
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their dentures during eating
Time Frame: 60 Days
Patients overall satisfaction rate during eating using visual analogue scale (a measurement instrument represented in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (satisfied and unsatisfied). Orientated from the left 'best' to the right 'worst').
60 Days
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their dentures during drinking
Time Frame: 60 Days
Patients overall satisfaction rate during drinking using visual analogue scale (a measurement instrument represented in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (satisfied and unsatisfied). Orientated from the left 'best' to the right 'worst').
60 Days
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their ability to clean their dentures
Time Frame: 60 Days
Patients overall satisfaction rate with their ability to clean their dentures using visual analogue scale (a measurement instrument represented in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (satisfied and unsatisfied). Orientated from the left 'best' to the right 'worst').
60 Days
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their phonetics
Time Frame: 60 Days
Patients' reported overall satisfaction with their phonetics using visual analogue scale (a measurement instrument represented in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (satisfied and unsatisfied). Orientated from the left 'best' to the right 'worst').
60 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10/2024/10664

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study data will not be made publicly available due to ethical considerations, patient privacy concerns, and institutional policies. However, aggregate results may be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Subscribe