The Objective of This Study is to Evaluate the Perfomance of a Photorefraction Device for Screening Ametropia in Children. Eligible Participants Will Undergo Multiple Refractive Error Measurements, Visual Acuity and Strabismus Assessments During a Single Evaluation Visit.

April 28, 2025 updated by: Essilor International

Evaluation of the Photorefraction Screener Snapsight in Comparison With Cycloplegia Table-top Autorefractor in Ametropia in Pediatric Population Between 3 and 8yo, Multicenter French Study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the performance of a photorefraction screener in terms of sensibility, sensitivity and accuracy on children aged 3 to 8 y.o. The main objectives of the study are:

  • Evaluate the performances of the device in comparison with the gold standard, i.e. a tabletop refractometer.
  • Assess the agreement of the measures obtained with the device with those obtained with the gold standard.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants after verification of their eligibility and informed consent, participate to a single evaluation visit during which several objective refraction measurements are performed with the investigational device, a tabletop refractometer and a comparable vision screener with and without cyclopegia. Additionally far vision visual acuity, strabismus assessments and subjective refraction measurement are also performed by investigators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

315

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Dr Krafft private practice
        • Contact:
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 3-8 years when included in the study
  • All skin phototypes (I to VI according to the Fitzpatrick classification)
  • Wearing glasses or not
  • Capacity to give valid consent
  • Capacity to follow the protocol to obtain reliable measure
  • Under French medical insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under myopia control solution that may have an impact on refractive error (such as: atropine, orthokeratology,..)
  • Wearing contact lenses
  • Ocular or systemic pathology that may have an impact on vision or may interfere with the study measures (except strabismus)
  • Under medication that may have an impact on vision or may interfere with study measurements
  • Known contraindication to the active substance or to one of the excipients of eye drops (Mydriaticum 0.5%, Skiacol 0.5%)
  • Known risk of angle-closure glaucoma
  • Participation to another study that may have an impact on vision or may interfere with the study measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Snapsight photorefraction device
Objective refraction measurement with and without cyclopegia
Objective refraction measurement with and without cyclopegia
Objective refraction measurement with and without cyclopegia
Distance visual acuity is assessed with the refraction measures found by the device under investigation and the comparator device with and without cyclopegia.
Subjective refraction is assessed and far visual acuity is assessed with the found refraction measures
Strabismus is assessed with the refraction measures found by the device under investigation and the comparator device with and without cyclopegia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perfomance evaluation for ametropia screening
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The performance of the device in terms of sensitivity is evaluated by comparison with a tabletop refractometer.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement of refraction measurements obtained with the device under investigation and a tabletop refractometer
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The evaluated refraction measurements are the spherical equivalent and Jackson's cylindrical vectors.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Perfomance evaluation for ametropia screening
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The performance of the device in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are evaluated by comparison with a tabletop refractometer.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Perfomance evaluation for amblyopia screening
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
The performance of the device in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are evaluated by comparison with a tabletop refractometer or the masking test and prism bars for strabismus.
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Safety assessment and device failures
Time Frame: One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).
Type, frequency and severity of adverse events and device failures are evaluated
One day (all measurements are taken during a single evaluation visit).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aranaud Sauer, MD, PhD, FEBO, Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WS10386-EPSS
  • 2024-A00780-47 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ametropia

Clinical Trials on Photorefraction device under investigation

Subscribe