Feasibility of a Minimally Invasive Diagnostic Algorithm in Suspected Crohn's Disease (ANDI-3)

March 17, 2025 updated by: Frederik Drejer Thrane, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark

Feasibility of a Minimally Invasive Diagnostic Algorithm in Suspected Crohn's Disease - a Prospective Comparison of Pan-Enteric Capsule Endoscopy Versus Ileocolonoscopy Plus MR Enterography or Small-Bowel Capsule Endoscopy

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a camera pill examination of the whole bowel can be used to diagnose Crohn's disease instead of colonoscopy and a small bowel examination (either MRI or camera pill) in patients aged 18-40 years suspected of having Crohn's disease.

The main question it aims to answer is:

How many patients examined with a camera pill examination of the whole bowel will have a complete examination of the whole bowel and have a diagnosis made without need for any more examinations?

Researchers will compare with patients examined with colonoscopy and a small bowel examination.

Participants will:

  • Be examined with either a camera pill examination of the whole bowel, or a colonoscopy and a small bowel examination
  • Have their electronic medical records checked to see if a diagnosis has been made
  • Have an interview every three months if diagnosed with an inflammatory bowel disease or after a year if no disease was found

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Esbjerg, Denmark, 6700
        • Recruiting
        • Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
        • Contact:
      • Odense C, Denmark, 5000
      • Svendborg, Denmark, 5700
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Odense University Hospital - Svendborg Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Vejle, Denmark, 7100
        • Recruiting
        • Lillebaelt Hospital Vejle - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
        • Contact:
      • Malmö, Sweden, 205 02

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical suspicion of CD*
  • Age 18-40 years
  • Signed informed consent

    *A clinical suspicion of CD is based on the following definition:

  • Diarrhea and/or abdominal pain for more than 1 month (or repeated episodes of diarrhea and/or abdominal pain) and either

    • fecal calprotectin ≥ 200 mg/kg or
    • fecal calprotectin ≥ 50 mg/kg plus one or more of the following findings:
  • C-reactive protein (CRP) > 5 mg/L
  • Thrombocytosis (> 400 x 109/L)
  • Anemia (hemoglobin < 7.0 mmol/L for women and < 8.0 mmol/L for men or a decrease > 0.5 mmol/L compared to the usual level)
  • Prolonged fever (> 37.5 ◦C for more than 2 weeks)
  • Weight loss (≥ 3 kg or ≥ 5% compared to the normal body weight)
  • Perianal abscess / fistula
  • Family history of inflammatory bowel disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous intestinal resection
  • Positive serologic markers for celiac disease
  • Positive stool polymerase chain reaction for pathogenic bacteria
  • Positive stool polymerase chain reaction for intestinal parasites
  • Suspected or established acute bowel obstruction (ileus)
  • Intake of NSAIDs or acetylsalicylic acid ≤ 4 weeks before inclusion, except low-dose, prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid (≤ 150 mg per day)
  • Intake of opioid or opioid-like medications ≤ 1 week before inclusion
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to comply with protocol requirements, e.g. for reasons including alcohol or recreational drug abuse
  • Known gastrointestinal disorder other than functional gastrointestinal disorders
  • Renal failure defined by a plasma-creatinine above the normal reference range

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Minimally invasive diagnostic algorithm
Panenteric capsule endoscopy
Active Comparator: Traditional work-up
Colonoscopy and either MRI enterography or small bowel capsule endoscopy
Endoscopic examination of the colon and terminal ileum after bowel preparation.
MRI of the small bowel
Capsule endoscopy of the small bowel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic completeness
Time Frame: Immediately after initial diagnostic procedure
Proportion of patients in each arm achieving a complete gastrointestinal assessment and an unambiguous diagnosis after completion of the initial diagnostic procedure(s) without need for supplementary examinations
Immediately after initial diagnostic procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of pan-enteric CE
Time Frame: After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Number of patients with suspected CD examined with pan-enteric CE and the number of ICs avoided
After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Additional examinations
Time Frame: After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Need for additional examinations in the two randomization arms
After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Safety
Time Frame: After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Number of severe adverse events
After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Time to diagnosis
Time Frame: After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Time from referral or first diagnostic procedure to final diagnosis and treatment
After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Disease classification and medical treatments
Time Frame: After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Disease classification and medical treatments in the two randomization arms
After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately after initial diagnostic procedure
Difference in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire (GESQ) score
Immediately after initial diagnostic procedure
Costs
Time Frame: After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Expenditure on diagnostic procedures, treatment and loss of productivity
After completion of follow-up (12 months)
Artificial intelligence
Time Frame: Immediately after initial diagnostic procedure
Diagnostic utility of AI algorithms in detection of gastrointestinal pathology using pan-enteric CE - sensitivity, specificity, severity, prediction and impact on clinical decision making
Immediately after initial diagnostic procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederik D Thrane, MD, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn's Disease

Clinical Trials on Panenteric capsule endoscopy

Subscribe