Efficacy of Simbrinza and Rocklatan vs Cosopt and Latanoprost

May 14, 2025 updated by: Prairie Eye Center

Efficacy and Tolerability of Simbrinza and Rocklatan vs. Cosopt

A randomized, multi-site, parallel-group, prospective study of patients who are adults with a diagnosis of mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG), currently on an on-label use of combination topical medication of Cosopt and Latanoprost for a minimum of 1 month.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62704
        • Recruiting
        • Prairie Eye Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sanda Yeh, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adults aged Eighteen (18) years and older with a diagnosis of mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG), currently on an on-label use of combination topical medication of Cosopt and Latanoprost for a minimum of 1 month. Evidence of optic nerve damage will be based on AAO Preferred Practice Patterns guidelines using either or both of the following:
  • Optic disc or retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) structural abnormalities
  • Diffuse or focal narrowing, or notching, of the optic disc rim, especially at the inferior or superior poles, which forms the basis for the ISNT rule
  • Progressive narrowing of the neuroretinal rim with an associated increase in cupping of the optic disc
  • Diffuse or localized abnormalities of the parapapillary RNFL, especially at the inferior or superior poles
  • Disc rim, parapapillary RNFL, or lamina cribrosa hemorrhages
  • Optic disc neural rim asymmetry of the two eyes consistent with loss of neural tissue
  • Large extent of parapapillary atrophy
  • Reliable and reproducible visual field abnormality considered a valid representation of the subject's functional status
  • Visual field damage consistent with RNFL damage (e.g. nasal step, arcuate field defect, or paracentral depression in clusters of test sites)
  • Visual field loss across the horizontal midline in one hemifield that exceeds loss in the opposite hemifield (in early/ moderate cases)
  • Absence of other known explanations (e.g. optic disc drusen, optic nerve pit)
  • Mean diurnal IOP ≥ 18 mmHg and < 28 mmHg at baseline in at least one eye with an inter-eye IOP difference < 5 mmHg.
  • A central corneal thickness (CCT) within the range of 450-650 µm

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with prior ocular procedures or intraocular surgery within 1 year prior to baseline (e.g. cataract surgery).
  • Patients with prior history of glaucoma surgeries or laser treatment except patients with history of SLT >1 yr prior to baseline.
  • Contraindications or known hypersensitivity to any or all the study medications including Rocklatan, Simbrinza, Cosopt and Latanoprost or related class of drugs.
  • Patients with known history or presence of uncontrolled systemic diseases including diseases that, in investigator's opinion, may make it unsafe or undesirable for the subject to participate in the study and/ or limit adherence.
  • Patients with known history or presence of significant ocular diseases including corneal diseases, dystrophies or abnormalities that would prevent accurate IOP readings with GAT.
  • Patients with a history of uncontrolled IOP with the combination of either Rocklatan + Simbrinza or Cosopt + Latanoprost dual therapy.
  • Significant ocular surface findings (e.g. hyperemia, irritation) found during slit lamp examination that might affect the study.
  • Chronic use of any systemic medication for chronic diseases that may affect IOP.
  • Subjects who are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy.
  • Any condition in the opinion in the investigator that would potentially confound the results of this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simbrinza and Rocklatan
SIMBRINZA (brinzolamide and brimonidine tartrate) 1%/0.2% ROCKLATAN (netarsudil and latanoprost) 0.02%/0.005%
brinzolamide and brimonidine tartrate
netarsudil and latanoprost
Active Comparator: Cosopt and Latanoprost
COSOPT (dorzolamide hydrochloride and timolol maleate) 2%/0.5% Latanoprost 0.005%
dorzolamide hydrochloride and timolol maleate
Latanoprost

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in mean diurnal IOP
Time Frame: from baseline at week 8
Mean diurnal IOP is determined as the average IOP measured at 8:30am, 12:00pm and 3:30pm
from baseline at week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean decrease in IOP at 8:30am
Time Frame: from baseline at week 8
from baseline at week 8
Mean decrease in IOP at 12:00pm
Time Frame: from baseline at week 8
from baseline at week 8
Mean decrease in IOP at 4:30pm
Time Frame: from baseline at week 8
from baseline at week 8

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean % IOP diurnal reduction
Time Frame: from baseline at week 8
Determined as the percentage decrease in average IOP measured at 8:30am, 12:00pm and 3:30pm
from baseline at week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandra Yeh, MD, Prairie Eye Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Open Angle Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Simbrinza 0.2%-1% Ophthalmic Suspension

Subscribe