Exalt Single-use Duodenoscope Vs Reusable Scope, a Randomized Controlled Trial

March 19, 2025 updated by: Neal Ambrish Mehta, Rush University Medical Center
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to evaluate the new generation Exalt Model disposable duodenoscope compared to the reusable scope in terms of feasibility, ease of use, adverse events, number of crossover events, and infection rates.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

To ensure a safe and high-quality endoscopy, there are multiple disinfection protocols for endoscopes. Side-viewing duodenoscopes with an adjustable accessory device (elevator) contain potential blind spots for debris and bacteria that require specialized cleaning and disinfection methods beyond standard protocols for other endoscopes. It is thought that the duodenoscope's design, persistent postprocedural microbial contamination and biofilm formation make it more prone to cross-contamination5. Gromski et al, found there are documented pathogenic transmissions, which led to harm in multiple patients and centers3. Infection control was likely related to two major components, reusable duodenoscopes and procedural factors related to how the reusable duodenoscopes were reprocessed3. Multidrug-resistant organisms, such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, that were associated with reusable duodenoscopes lead the FDA to mandate the transition to improved cleaning and disinfection methods or single-use platforms to eliminate infection transmission. One such single-use platform is the Exalt Model D (Boston Scientific, Marlboro, MA), which received FDA approval in 2020 for use of single-use duodenoscopes. Early iterations of the Exalt were used on a case-by-case basis per institution-specific protocols, mainly due to the learning curve involved with using the scope. A new version of Exalt has been released to market in 2023 with modifications that may make it more feasible to use in all settings requiring a duodenoscope. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to evaluate the new generation Exalt Model disposable duodenoscope compared to the reusable scope in terms of feasibility, ease of use, adverse events, number of crossover events, and infection rates.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60607
        • Recruiting
        • Rush University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients > 18 years old who have biliary or pancreatic duct disorder, based on clinical symptoms and radiological findings at CT or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
  • Native papilla

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
  • Prior history of ERCP
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exalt Model D
Exalt Model D single use duodenoscope will be used for ERCP
Exalt Model D single-use duodenoscope will be used in ERCP
Other Names:
  • Single-use duodenoscope
Active Comparator: Standard Reusable
Standard reusable model of duodenoscope will be used for ERCP
Standard reusable duodenoscope will be used in ERCP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of attempts required to achieve successful cannulation of the desired duct
Time Frame: From the time of the ERCP to 7 days post-ERCP per standard of care
Measure and compare the total number of attempts required to achieve successful cannulation of the desired duct.
From the time of the ERCP to 7 days post-ERCP per standard of care

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crossover single to reusable
Time Frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
The incidence of crossovers from single-use duodenoscope to reusable duodenoscope
From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
Use of advanced cannulation techniques
Time Frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
The utilization of advanced cannulation techniques in ERCP procedure
From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
Performance on ERCP maneuvers
Time Frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
Subjective ratings on 14 ERCP maneuvers. ("not preferred/neutral/preferred" relative to the reusable duodenoscope endoscopist usually uses in clinical practice), 23 device performance characteristics. (Likert scale of 1 [not preferred] to 5 [comparable with reusable duodenoscope])
From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
Adverse events
Time Frame: From the completion of the ERCP to 7 days post-ERCP per standard of care
Post- ERCP pancreatitis, post-sphincterotomy bleed, and infection at 72 hours and 7 days post-ERCP procedure per Standard of Care.
From the completion of the ERCP to 7 days post-ERCP per standard of care
Endoscopist-determined ease of use
Time Frame: From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure
Median overall satisfaction with the single-use duodenoscope during the procedure (Likert scale of 1 [unsatisfied] to 10 [very satisfied], followed by the option "If you answered ≤ 5, specify reason")
From the start of the ERCP to the end of procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neal A Mehta, MD, Rush University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Duct Disorder

Clinical Trials on Exalt Model D

Subscribe