SENTInel Node Mapping Versus Comprehensive Lymphadenectomy in p53-Mutated Endometrial Cancer: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Trial (SENTIMETREP53)

February 13, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Comparing SENTInel Node Mapping to Comprehensive Lymphadenectomy in p53-Mutated EndoMETRial Cancer: a Prospective, Open-label, Controlled, Randomized, Non-inferiority, De-escalation Trial

This study evaluates surgical strategies for treating patients with FIGO 2023 stage I and II high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) exhibiting p53 mutations. The trial aims to assess whether a less invasive sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping approach provides non-inferior oncological outcomes compared to the current standard of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PL+PALND). By minimizing surgical morbidity, this study seeks to determine if SLN mapping can safely replace comprehensive lymphadenectomy without compromising disease-free survival (DFS). Eligible patients will be randomized to undergo either sentinel lymph node mapping or complete lymphadenectomy, followed by standard hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The primary outcome is DFS at 36 months, with secondary outcomes including overall survival, disease-specific survival, perioperative complications, and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The necessity of extensive lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer remains a subject of debate. Although systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PL+PALND) improves disease staging and influences adjuvant therapy, its impact on survival in high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) is still controversial. Recent evidence suggests that SLN mapping may provide comparable staging accuracy while reducing surgical complications. However, the oncological safety of replacing PL+PALND with SLN mapping in high-risk EC patients, particularly those with p53 mutations, remains uncertain.

This study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of SLN mapping versus PL+PALND in patients with high-risk EC characterized by p53 mutations. Patients will be stratified based on tumor histology and imaging findings before undergoing surgery. The trial will enroll 374 patients across 22 participating centers.

Key issues addressed include:

  • Oncological Safety: Assessing whether SLN mapping provides equivalent DFS compared to PL+PALND.
  • Survival Outcomes: Evaluating overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) at 36 months.
  • Surgical Morbidity: Comparing perioperative and postoperative complications
  • Quality of Life: Determining patient-reported outcomes related to surgical recovery and long-term functional status.

This study integrates modern molecular classifications, recognizing p53 mutations as a significant prognostic marker. If SLN mapping is proven non-inferior, it could lead to a paradigm shift, reducing the extent of surgical intervention for high-risk EC patients while maintaining oncological safety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

374

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1 . ≥ 18 years old 2. High-risk endometrial cancer, as defined by the ESGO-ESTRO 20211 histological and molecular classification, with p53 mutation confirmed on endometrial biopsy or curettage in the two months before the surgery 3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) confirmed FIGO 2023 stage I and II endometrial cancer, i.e., confined to the uterine corpus, ovary and the cervical stroma.

4. Participant with a scheduled surgical intervention (total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with omentectomy in the case of serous, carcinosarcoma and undifferenciated type EC) 5. Eligible for comprehensive lymphadenectomy by laparoscopy 6. Participant with a negative Positron Emission Tomography scan (PET-CT scan) for lymph node involvement in the two months before the intervention 7. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0-1 8. Participant able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recurrent EC
  2. Previous chemo-, radio, or endocrine therapy for EC
  3. Any contra-indication to lymphadenectomy and/or chemotherapy
  4. Any contraindication to laparoscopy
  5. Any criteria, based on the investigator's judgment, that would contraindicate the surgical procedure (e.g., but not limited to, anesthetic risk, bleeding, significant comorbidities)
  6. Any known disorder or circumstances making participation in trial and follow-up questionable
  7. Patients with other malignancies for whom the disease(s) and/or associated treatment(s) might have an impact on the patient's cancer prognosis
  8. Known HIV-infection or AIDS
  9. Simultaneous participation in another interventional clinical trial
  10. Within the exclusion period following participation in another interventional clinical trial
  11. Patients with difficulties in reading or understanding French, or an inability to understand the delivered information
  12. Patients in emergency medical situations
  13. Patient under guardianship or limited guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping
Patients in this arm will undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping, followed by total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and, for serous, carcinosarcoma and undifferentiated type EC, infracolic omentectomy. The determination to perform para-aortic lymphadenectomy on SLN+ patients is left to the clinical team. Adjuvant treatment will depend of the status.
The SLN mapping protocol will follow the EU guidelines and the consensus in competency assessment tool. Prior to SLN mapping, a full inspection of the pelvic areas with white light is performed to exclude the presence of extrauterine disease. The next surgical steps will be 1- identification of external iliac vessels, 2- identification of internal iliac artery, 3- dissection of the ureter, 4- development of paravesical space and 5- identification of obliterated umbilical ligament. The dissection technique must avoid disrupting lymphatic channels and isolate nodal tissue from the local anatomy. Indocyanine green (1.25mg/mL) will be injected in the cervix at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions, with 1mL superficial and 1mL deep, for a total of 4mL. All mapped SLNs must be completely excised, and any visually suspicious nodes should also be removed, regardless of the mapping results. If the SLN mapping appears to be unfeasible, a side-specific pelvic lymphadenectomy will be performed.
Active Comparator: Complete lymphadenectomy
Patients in this arm will undergo comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy that extends up to the left renal vein, followed by total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with omentectomy for serous, carcinosarcoma and undifferentiated type EC. Adjuvant treatment will depend of the status.

The resection of at least one lymph node in each of the 12 retroperitoneal regions is necessary:

A: upper para-aortic region B: lower para-aortic region C: interaorto-caval region D: paracaval region E: right and left iliaca communis region F: right and left iliaca externa region G: right and left fossa obturatoria region: defined by external and internal arteria iliaca, pelvic sidewall H: right and left iliaca interna region: lymph nodes adjacent to or medial of the internal iliacal artery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free-survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 36 months
Time from randomization to first recurrence or death from any cause, censored at last follow-up
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 36 months
Time from randomization to death due to endometrial cancer, censored for other deaths/last follow-up.
36 months
Disease-specific survival (DSS)
Time Frame: 36 Months
Time from randomization to death due to endometrial cancer,
36 Months
Perioperative complications rate and postoperative complications rate
Time Frame: At 30- and 90-days
The classification of Clavien-Dindo will be used.
At 30- and 90-days
Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT)
Time Frame: From the date of surgery (Day 0) until the first day of adjuvant treatment, assessed up to 90 days.
Time in days between the date of surgery and the first day of adjuvant treatment.
From the date of surgery (Day 0) until the first day of adjuvant treatment, assessed up to 90 days.
Quality of life - EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire score
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire is a 30 item instrument meant to assess some of the different aspects that define the quality of life of cancer patients
At baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months
Quality of life - EORTC QLQ-EN24 questionnaire score
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months
EORTC QLQ-EN24 questionnaire is designed to assess disease and treatment specific aspects of the quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer
At baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months
Accuracy of PET-CT scan in the detection of metastatic lymph nodes
Time Frame: From Day -60 to Day -1 before surgery (Day 0)
Determination of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value
From Day -60 to Day -1 before surgery (Day 0)
Assessment of the rate of unsuccessful SLN mapping, requiring conversion to pelvic lymphadenectomy
Time Frame: At surgery time
Rate of unsuccessful SLN mapping, requiring conversion to pelvic lymphadenectomy
At surgery time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Cancer

Clinical Trials on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping

Subscribe