Alternative RUTFs for Treatment of Child Wasting

Efficacy of Alternative RUTFs for Treatment of Child Wasting and Prevention of Relapse

Acute malnutrition is the most life-threatening form of undernutrition. Moderate and severe acute malnutrition (MAM, SAM) are effectively treated with ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTFs) but there is a need to lower the cost of treatment and improve treatment regimens to reduce risk of relapse MAM/SAM episodes following recovery. The currently used standard formulation of RUTF contains peanuts and dairy, which pose problems due to their high cost, the need to import ingredients to the Global South (in the case of dairy), and risk of aflatoxin (in the case of peanuts). Before alternative formulations of RUTF can be recommended, however, there is the need for data on the efficacy of these formulations on recovery rates and to what extent recovery is sustainable. Sustainable recovery implies a lower rate of post-treatment relapse.

The study objectives are as follows: (1) To assess the non-inferiority of soy-maize-sorghum (SMS-) RUTF and soy-based (S-) RUTF on treatment recovery to standard RUTF; (2) To assess the superiority of SMS-RUTF and S- RUTF on post-recovery relapse compared to standard RUTF; (3) To assess the costs of a treatment course of SMS-RUTF, S-RUTF, and standard RUTF; (4) To assess the effect of SMS-RUTF and S-RUTF on microbiome composition and intestinal inflammation

The investigators will conduct a facility-based, individually randomized controlled trial with three arms allocated in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio in 30 health facilities (Centre de Santé et Promotion Sociale [CSPS]) in Burkina Faso. The investigators will randomize 1080 children with MAM and 1080 children with uncomplicated SAM 6-59 months of age to receive treatment with one of the following RUTFs: (1) standard of care, milk- and peanut-based RUTF (control group); (2) SMS-RUTF free of milk and peanuts and high in fiber (intervention 1); or (3) S-RUTF free of milk and peanuts (intervention 2). Children will be enrolled upon presentation to facilities for MAM or uncomplicated SAM treatment. Follow up visits will be weekly during treatment for SAM children and bi-weekly during treatment for MAM children, and monthly for 3 months following discharge from treatment. The primary study outcomes include, among others, anthropometric recovery at discharge (a non-inferiority analysis) and relapse to MAM or SAM within the 3 months following recovery (a superiority analysis). The investigators will employ an activity-based micro-costing approach to collect cost data on the direct and indirect medical costs, opportunity costs to caregivers, personnel, and overheads associated with outpatient MAM or SAM treatment. Fecal samples will be collected from children at a subset of facilities (5 facilities, ~60 children per treatment arm), at enrollment (initiation of treatment), discharge from treatment, and 3-months post-discharge.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2269

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
        • Health centers localted in the region of Hauts-Bassins

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 6-59 months
  • MUAC < 12.5 cm, or WLZ/WHZ < -2
  • Absence of clinical complications or nutritional edema
  • Pass the appetite test
  • Accompanied by caregiver or legal guardian
  • Caregiver or legal guardian consents to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute malnutrition requiring hospitalization (presence of clinical complications, failure to pass the appetite test, or presence of bilateral pitting edema)
  • Known allergy to any of the ingredients in the RUTF products
  • Already enrolled in MAM or SAM treatment program
  • Presence of physical abnormalities that make measurement of anthropometry impossible
  • Caregiver has intention to move out of the study area within the next 6 months
  • Children referred from in-patient facilities to continue in ambulatory care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard RUTF
This is the control arm of the trial, in which children will receive the standard RUTF product for treatment of acute malnutrition
This is the control, the standard, currently used formulation of ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTFs), which contains dairy and peanut ingredients
Experimental: Soy-based RUTF
This is an interventional arm of the trial, in which children will receive an alternative formulation, a soy-based RUTF
This alternative formulation of ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTFs) is a peanut-free formula that includes dairy (milk powder) with added crystalline amino acids
Experimental: Soy-maize-sorghum-based RUTF
This is an interventional arm of the trial, in which children will receive an alternative formulation, a soy-maize-sorghum-based RUTF
This alternative formulation of ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTFs) is a peanut-free and dairy-free formula with added crystalline amino acids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anthropometric recovery
Time Frame: At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) ≥ -2 and middle upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 125 mm and absence of bilateral pitting edema for two consecutive visits
At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Default from treatment
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Child is absent for two consecutive visits, declared a defaulter on the second visit
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Relapse to wasting
Time Frame: Within 3 months post-discharge
A new episode of wasting (defined as weight-for-length/height z-score [WLZ/WHZ] < -2 or middle upper arm circumference [MUAC] < 125 mm or presence of bilateral pitting edema) within the 3-month period following recovery from the index wasting episode, among children who recovered from their index episode
Within 3 months post-discharge
Transfer to inpatient treatment
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Referral or admission to hospital for inpatient treatment during the treatment course
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Weight gain
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Change in child's weight (gram/kilogram/day) between weight on day of admission to treatment and day of discharge
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Non-response to treatment
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Any of the following criteria are met: Absence of weight gain after 5 weeks or at the third visit; weight loss for more than 4 weeks in the program or at the second visit; loss of more than 5% of body weight compared to admission weight at any time; or anthropometric recovery criteria not met after 3 months of follow-up in treatment
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Adherence to treatment services
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Caregiver attends the recommended schedule of visits and receive ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) supply
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Length of stay
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
The number of days between the day the child is admitted to treatment and the day the child is determined to be recovered and thus discharged from treatment
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Anthropometry
Time Frame: At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Weight-for-length/height z-score (WLZ/WHZ), middle upper arm circumference (MUAC), weight, height/length, length/height-for-age z-score (LAZ/HAZ) and weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Relapse to MAM
Time Frame: Within 3 months post-discharge
A new episode of MAM (weight-for-length/height z-score [WLZ/WHZ] <-2 and ≥-3, or middle upper arm circumference [MUAC] <125 mm and ≥115 mm) within the 3-month period following recovery from the index wasting episode
Within 3 months post-discharge
Relapse to SAM
Time Frame: Within 3 months post-discharge
A new episode of SAM (weight-for-length/height z-score [WLZ/WHZ] < -3 or middle upper arm circumference [MUAC] < 115 mm or presence of bilateral pitting edema) within the 3-month period following recovery from the index wasting episode
Within 3 months post-discharge
Anthropometry
Time Frame: At 3 months post-discharge
Weight-for-length/height z-score (WLZ/WHZ), middle upper arm circumference (MUAC), weight, height/length, length/height-for-age z-score (LAZ/HAZ) and weight-for-age z-score (WAZ)
At 3 months post-discharge
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Hemoglobin concentration (grams/liter)
At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: At 3 months post-discharge
Hemoglobin concentration (grams/liter)
At 3 months post-discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Indication of morbidity (acute respiratory infections, diarrhea, fever, or malaria) on health center card
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Anemia
Time Frame: At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Hemoglobin concentration < 105 gram/liter for children 6-23 months of age Hemoglobin concentration < 110 gram/liter for children 24-59 months of age
At discharge, which is up to 12 weeks after admission
Anemia
Time Frame: At 3 months post-discharge
Hemoglobin concentration < 110 gram/liter
At 3 months post-discharge
Mortality
Time Frame: During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission, or during the 3-month post-discharge follow up
Child has deceased
During treatment, which is up to 12 weeks after admission, or during the 3-month post-discharge follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: After 7 days of product trial
Observed dose intake/consumed (grams)
After 7 days of product trial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laeticia Toe, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

In accordance with the International Food Policy Research Institute's policy on research data management and open access, at the time of publication of scientific articles presenting results, the fully anonymized databases will become a public good and will be made available to the scientific community, government, and partners.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wasting

Clinical Trials on Standard RUTF

Subscribe