Effectiveness of a Microbiome-directed Food to Promote Programmatic and Sustained Nutritional Recovery Among Children With Uncomplicated Acute Malnutrition

August 26, 2024 updated by: Sheila Isanaka, Epicentre
This study is an individually randomized controlled trial comparing microbiome-directed foods to standard nutritional therapy among children aged 6 to < 24 months with uncomplicated acute malnutrition in terms of programmatic recovery by 12 weeks from admission and sustained recovery at 24 weeks from admission.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

7356

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • for children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM): MUAC < 115 mm and/or WLZ < -3 and/or mild (+) or moderate (++) edema
  • for children with Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM): 115 mm ≤ MUAC < 125 mm and/or -3 ≤ WHZ < -2
  • Caregiver providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical complications requiring inpatient treatment, as identified by the national protocol
  • Not eating/lack of appetite (as informed by appetite test and investigator judgement)
  • Re-admission into the program within 2 months of previous default
  • for children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM): Referral from inpatient care (therapeutic feeding center, TFC) or supplementary feeding program (SFP)
  • for children with Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM): Referral from SAM treatment (TFC or OTP)
  • Presence of congenital abnormality or underlying chronic disease that may affect growth or risk of infection
  • Known contraindication/ hypersensitivity/allergy to study interventions (chickpea/soy flour, banana, peanut)
  • Residence outside the study catchment area or in a non-fixed (e.g. nomadic) community

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Microbiome directed food (MDF)
The MDF in this study was developed by the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,B). This MDF is the lead icddr,B prototype that has demonstrated the strongest increase in biomarkers critical to growth, including growth hormone receptor and leptin, and re-establishment of the maturity of the microbiome among moderately malnourished children. Ingredients include chickpea flour, soy flour, peanut paste, green banana powder, sugar, oil, and micronutrients. The same MDF is provided for the treatment of SAM and MAM at modified doses.
MDF will be provided to children on a weekly basis for children with SAM and bi-weekly basis for children with MAM at the health center until programmatic recovery but not thereafter.
Active Comparator: Standard nutritional treatment (RUTF/RUSF)
The standard RUTF used in this study for the treatment of SAM is Plumpy'Nut (Nutriset France). RUTF is a specialized therapeutic food that can be consumed without preparation and meets the nutritional requirements for the recovery of SAM. Ingredients include oil, peanut, skimmed milk powder, sugar and micronutrients. The standard RUSF used in this study is Plumpy'Sup (Nutriset France). RUSF is a lipid-based nutritional supplement with a high vitamin and mineral content, specifically designed for the treatment of MAM. Ingredients include oil, peanut, skimmed milk powder, sugar and micronutrients.
RUTF will be provided to all children on a weekly basis at the health center until programmatic recovery but not thereafter
Other Names:
  • Standard RUTF
RUSF will be provided on a biweekly basis at the health center until programmatic recovery but not thereafter
Other Names:
  • Standard RUSF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Programmatic recovery by 12 weeks from admission
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Defined as the proportion of SAM and MAM children achieving a WLZ ≥ -2 AND MUAC ≥ 125mm AND no edema during 2 consecutive visits
12 weeks
Sustained recovery at 24 weeks from admission
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of recovered SAM and MAM children with WLZ ≥ -2 AND MUAC ≥ 125mm AND no edema
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Default
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Defined as 2 consecutive missed scheduled program visits
12 weeks
Non-response
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Defined as WLZ < -2 or MUAC < 125 mm during 2 consecutive visits, or for SAM children only: persistent edema at 12 weeks
12 weeks
Time to recovery
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Measured as days from admission to programmatic recovery among recovered children
12 weeks
For MAM children: Deterioration to SAM
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) inferior to -3
24 weeks
Change in weight gain
Time Frame: From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in g/kg/day
From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in MUAC
Time Frame: From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in mm
From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Combined safety endpoint, including hospitalization and death
24 weeks
Hospitalization
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Inpatient stay > 24h
24 weeks
Death
Time Frame: 24 weeks
All-cause mortality
24 weeks
Motor, cognitive, language, social-emotional, and mental health skills
Time Frame: 24 weeks
As measured by the Caregiver Reported Early Development Instrument (CREDI)
24 weeks
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
As defined by the incremental cost per child recovered and per child sustained recovered
24 weeks
Dietary intake
Time Frame: 24 weeks
As measured by 24h recall
24 weeks
Adherence
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Defined as the sum of sachets returned used divided by the total number of sachets distributed
12 weeks
Microbiome profile at enrollment, week 4, program discharge, and study discharge
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Defined as PCR-confirmed enteric viral, bacterial, and protozoan pathogens present
24 weeks
Plasma proteome profile at enrollment, week 4, program discharge, and study discharge
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Defined as circulating plasma proteins (IGFBP-2, thrombospondin-5, granulysin, GDF-15, and MMP-8)
24 weeks
Environmental enteric dysfunction at enrollment, program discharge, and study discharge
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured by anti-LPS IgA and IgG; anti-flagellin IgA and IgG; sCD14; I-FABP; myeloperoxidase (MPO); and calprotectin
24 weeks
Change of fat mass and fat-free mass at program discharge and study discharge
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured by deuterium dilution
24 weeks
Micronutrient status at enrollment, program discharge and study discharge
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Defined as ferritin; soluble transferrin binding protein; alpha-tocopherol; retinol; folate; and vitamin B12
24 weeks
Immuno-sufficiency at week 2, week 4, program discharge, week 12 and study discharge (SAM only)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
As defined by T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and kappa-receptor excision circles (KRECs)
24 weeks
Change in weight-for-length Z (WLZ)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in WLZ calculated using the 2006 WHO Growth Standards
From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in length-for-age Z (LAZ)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in LAZ calculated using the 2006 WHO Growth Standards
From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in weight-for-age Z (WAZ)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Change in WAZ calculated using the 2006 WHO Growth Standards
From enrollment to 4, 8 and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 823779-MDF Niger

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition, Child

Clinical Trials on MDF

Subscribe