Effect of Photobiomodulation in Patients With Temporomandibular Dysfunction Refractory to Botulinum Toxin Treatment.

April 3, 2025 updated by: Bruno Macedo de Sousa, University of Coimbra

Effect of Photobiomodulation in Patients With Temporomandibular Dysfunction Refractory to Botulinum Toxin Treatment: A Non-controlled Multicentric Pilot Study

The objective of this preliminary research was to identify the effect of low-level laser photobiomodulation therapy (LLLT-PBMT) in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), refractory to botulinum toxin (BTX) treatment.

Specifically, the hypothesis of LLLT-PBMT as a safe, low-cost, painless, and minimally invasive alternative therapy was proposed to improve complete muscle recovery and significantly reduce muscle paralysis in patients with masticatory muscle disorders previously treated with BTX. Additionally, different treatment alternatives were investigated, and a protocol was suggested for the application of LLLT-PBMT in myofascial TMDs and the pain associated with masticatory muscles, also analyzing its complications and negative effects

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Salamanca, Spain, 37007
        • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery at the University Hospital Complex of Salamanca

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Ten female patients were included who attended the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery at the University Hospital Complex of Salamanca.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients diagnosed with TMDs. Presence of unilateral or bilateral painful symptoms. Associated conditions: Bruxism, hypertrophy of the masticatory muscles, headaches
  • Previous treatment with BTX:

Minimum of 3 doses (100 IU) Applied in masticatory muscles and intracapsular area No favorable results obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without prior treatment of this type.
  • Patients receiving treatment in the Pain Unit.
  • Patients undergoing invasive treatments: Open surgery in the cervicofacial region or TMJ arthrocentesis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
LLLT-PBMT
Three patients (30%) received treatment on the left side and seven (70%) on the right side. The treatment was carried out using the EPIC X laser (BIOLASE®), which uses a solid-state diode as a semiconductor source of invisible infrared radiation.
Three patients (30%) received treatment on the left side and seven (70%) on the right side. The treatment was carried out using the EPIC X laser (BIOLASE®), which uses a solid-state diode as a semiconductor source of invisible infrared radiation. The therapy was applied to the masticatory muscles (temporal, masseter, internal pterygoid), to trigger points discovered on palpation and to the intra-articular area of the TMJ (posterior portion through the external ear, superior portion and anterior portion). All patients included in the study underwent four sessions of PBMT-LLL for four consecutive weeks. T

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity and frequency of the symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
To evaluate both the severity and the frequency of the symptoms associated with TMJ disorders, the anamnestic index of Fonseca was used, considered a valid tool for diagnostic confirmation.
Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
For the evaluation of pain, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used, which provides a subjective evaluation of pain, with a scale of values from 0 to 10 representing the intensity of pain in an ascending manner.
Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
Pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
Pressure pain (PP) was measured using a pressure algometer (Wagner FPI 10®) that shows its strength during manual therapy on pressure points (tip of the algometer perpendicular to the muscle, maintaining the pressure which is progressively increased up to 1 kg/sec).
Baseline and four weeks after the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum mouth opening
Time Frame: Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
To measure the maximum mouth opening (MMO), a digital gauge (Ubermann®) was used, taking two measurements, and the average was used for statistical analysis.
Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
Depression and anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) questionnaire was used to assess affective states through the 21 questions that make up the tool. Scores are reported as a total score (ranging from 0 to 63) and individual scores for three subscales (ranging from 0 to 21). Additionally, percentiles are calculated based on community samples. Each subscale score is classified into five severity levels: normal, mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe.
Baseline and four weeks after the treatment
Satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: Four weeks after the treatment
The degree of satisfaction with the treatment received was evaluated in the patients. For this purpose, the Likert scale was used, a validated scale consisting of 5 items that evaluates attitudes, perceptions or levels of satisfaction.
Four weeks after the treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nanci Lopez-Valverde, PhD, University of Salamanca

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Disorder

Clinical Trials on Low- level laser- photobiomodulation therapy

Subscribe