Developing Strategies for Implementation and Use of the Operating Room Black Box (ORBB)

May 22, 2026 updated by: Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

The goal of this study is to evaluate the current use of Operating Room Black Box (ORBB)data in order to develop simulation-based training that improves intraoperative outcomes and safety, and to assess barriers and facilitators to its implementation.

There are 3 Aims for this study that the investigator will test, but the Aim that is the interventional portion of this study is only reported here in Aim 2 - Establish the validity and effectiveness of high-fidelity immersive virtual simulation-based training in improving operating room quality and safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will use a mixed within and between subjects' design with two groups - control, and simulation. Due to the dedicated time needed to enroll and complete the sessions along with the need for complete novice subjects, the investigator will recruit medical students at UT Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) from all years for the simulation group. For the Control group, the investigator will recruit participants from our OR team with a minimum of 5 years of experience at Clements University Hospital (CUH) consisting of surgeons, residents, scrub techs, circulating nurses, anesthesiologists, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) or first assists. Subjects will be randomized into either a control group (didactic) or experimental group (didactic with virtual simulation training). Pre-test: Both groups will take a knowledge assessment test (Multiple choice) that measures baseline knowledge in performing surgical safety checklist. Immediately after that, the participants will be asked to perform the surgical safety checklist once on the simulator. For uniform standard, all participants will choose the role of a surgeon. Both groups will then complete an online introductory module on surgical safety checklists that will be specifically created for use at UTSW. Subjects in the experimental group will then practice on the simulator for 8 sessions with each session not exceeding an hour. The 8 sessions will be completed within three weeks of the pre-test. Deliberate practice will be used to achieve satisfactory scores in the training. A total of 3 scenarios, which will be selected from expert inputs and align with institute priority, will be selected for the training. Post-test: At the end of three weeks, subjects from both groups will once again take the online knowledge test followed by performing the checklists on the simulator. Transfer test: One week after post-test, subjects from both groups will perform surgical safety checklists in a simulated operating room at the UTSW Simulation Center to assess predictive validity. For other team members during the transfer test, the investigator will use the research team and volunteers from the surgical service team. The transfer test performance will be videotaped for assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OR service with a minimum of 5 years of experience that includes surgeons, residents, scrub techs, circulating nurses, anesthesiologists, CRNAs or first assists

Exclusion Criteria:

  • OR team members (surgeons, scrub techs, circulating nurses, anesthesiologists, CRNAs or first assists) with less than 5 years of experience

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Group 1: Control
Group 1 participants will not receive any additional training except for instutionally mandated training
Experimental: Group 2: Simulation
Group 2 will practice on the simulator one session every day for 4 weeks.
Training for performing surgical safety checklist for a period of 4 weeks.
Experimental: Group 3: Simulation with repeated reinforcement
Group 3 participants will practice on the simulator one session every day for 4 weeks and will continue to practice on the simulator once per week for an additional two months to a total of 8 sessions.
Training for performing surgical safety checklist for a period of 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in surgical safety checklist performance at 1 month post intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, at one month post intervention
Change in surgical safety checklist performance is assessed using the Compliance, engagement and quality scores computed automatically using the ORBB
Baseline, at one month post intervention
Change in surgical safety checklist performance at 3 months post intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, at 3 months post intervention
Change in surgical safety checklist performance is assessed using the Compliance, engagement and quality scores computed automatically using the ORBB
Baseline, at 3 months post intervention
Change in surgical safety checklist performance at 5 months post intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, at 5 months post intervention
Change in surgical safety checklist performance is assessed using the Compliance, engagement and quality scores computed automatically using the ORBB
Baseline, at 5 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, PhD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU-2024-0975
  • AHRQ (Other Grant/Funding Number: 1R01HS029874-01A1)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Demonstrate Effectiveness of Virtual Simulator in Improving OR Performance

Subscribe