Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation for Children and Youth With Spina Bifida

October 9, 2025 updated by: Kristin Zhao, PhD, Mayo Clinic

Characterization of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Enabling Reflex Motor Evoked Responses in Children and Youth With Spina Bifida

A study to use transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to characterize sensorimotor deficits in a pediatric population of individuals with spina bifida.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study's goals involve understanding how transcutaneous stimulation affects motor deficits across three dimensions; weakness, coordination, and spasticity. This will be investigated by an electrophysiological characterization lower-extremity deficits, using TS to interrogate neuromotor topography and connectivity of the spinal cord to specific muscles. These evaluations will enable a unique patient-specific understanding of the electrophysiological mechanisms underlying motor deficits. Furthermore, these evaluations will assess the therapeutic potential of a novel closed-loop TS plasticity induction protocol to strengthen weakened muscles in a pediatric SB population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Congenital diagnosis of myelomeningocele (MMC)
  • Able to follow verbal commands or instructions.
  • If female and able to become pregnant, must be willing to use medically-acceptable method of contraception during study participation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe cognitive deficits demonstrating inability to communicate needs
  • Gaping, weeping, or unhealed open wounds at the site of electrode placement
  • Unhealed fractures on load bearing bones
  • History of osteoporosis
  • History of implanted electronic devices at the stimulation location(e.g. deep brain stimulator, cardiac pacemaker, diaphragmatic pacer, baclofen pumps, insulin pumps, etc.)
  • Pregnancy
  • Epilepsy
  • History of seizure
  • Ongoing infections (currently being treated or are symptomatic)
  • Any illness or condition which, based on the research team's assessment, will compromise the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, patient safety, or the validity of the data collected during this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional motor training with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be delivered to the skin over the lower thoracic and lumbar spine region using adhesive electrodes for ages 5-11 for one multi-hour visit. The effects of stimulation will be recorded via electrophysiological and biomechanical metrics described within the outcomes measures.
DS8R (Digitimer LLC) for transcutaneous neurostimulation.
Experimental: Extended functional motor training with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
An extended functional training arm for a subset of 10 subjects, ages 12-18, in which they will receive up to twelve multi-hour sessions of a therapeutic neuromuscular strengthening intervention within a 6 week period.
DS8R (Digitimer LLC) for transcutaneous neurostimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manual muscle testing (MMT)
Time Frame: 1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Measuring muscle strength and function using the Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle Grading Scale. A physical therapist will use a 5-point scale to manually test the 5 lower extremity muscles on each side, with 0 being no visible or palpable contraction, up to 5 being full range of motion against gravity with maximal resistance. The maximum total score would be 50.
1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Spasticity (1)
Time Frame: 1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Change in measurement of leg muscle tone utilizing the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). A physical therapist will use a 5-point scale to assess resistance of major muscles during passive range of motion, with a lower score for a muscle indicating less tone. MAS for 4 muscle groups in each leg will be reported.
1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Spasticity (2)
Time Frame: 1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Change in measurements of leg muscle tone utilizing Wartenberg's pendulum test, with the first swing angle (FSA) degrees as the primary outcome. Fewer degrees on swing angle indicating greater spasticity.
1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Gait
Time Frame: 1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Gait speed will be quantified in m/sec utilizing a motion capture system, with faster gait speed indicating less impairment.
1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Coordination
Time Frame: 1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
Coordination will be reported with the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) total limb score for both right and left leg. Total score for each limb is 10, with a higher score indicating coordination closer to optimal.
1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: 1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)
TS-evoked motor potential (MEP) amplitude, in millivolts, will be reported for major lower limbs muscles. An increase in MEP amplitude is indicative of greater muscle activation, closer to optimal function.
1 to 12 visits (up to 6 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristin Zhao, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Joline Brandenburg, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There are no plans to share individual participant data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelomeningocele

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous stimulation

Subscribe