- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06919562
OPtimal stEnt Deployment stRategy oF Contemporary sTents - Registry to Evaluate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Bioresorbable Scaffolds With Thinner-strut Construction and Guidance by intracOronary Imaging to REduce Scaffold Failure (PERFECTRESTORE)
May 15, 2026 updated by: Jin M. Cheng, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Netherlands
Implantation of a metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) is currently the gold standard in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
However, a DES has several limitations on the long-term, such as chronic local inflammation which may lead to in-stent restenosis, absence of physiological coronary vasomotion and vessel caging which makes future coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) impossible.
A bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) is designed to overcome these limitations.
The first generation BRS was shown to be clinically inferior to DES due to a slightly higher rate of stent thrombosis.
To overcome this problem, several scientific developments have been achieved in the past few years, such as thinner BRS strut construction and improved implantation technique by using PSP (predilatation, sizing, postdilatation) method and intracoronary imaging guidance with optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravasculair ultrasound (IVUS).
A PCI protocol that combines implantation of a second generation thin-strut BRS, mandatory PSP implantation method and mandatory intracoronary imaging-guidance has not yet been investigated.
The aim of this study is to investigate feasibility of a new PCI protocol with implantation of the second generation Meres100 thin-strut BRS combined with a protocolized PSP implantation technique guided by intracoronary imaging.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
117
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Jin M. Cheng, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +31786541492
- Email: j.m.cheng@asz.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Dordrecht, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with obstructive stable coronary artery disease
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Stable coronary artery disease with one or more significant epicardial stenosis in native coronary arteries suitable for OCT or IVUS-guided PCI with BRS implantation.
- Subject must be at least 18 years of age
- Written consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Culprit lesions in the setting of acute coronary syndrome.
- Lesions with severe calcification.
- Lesions in a coronary artery with severe tortuosity.
- Left main coronary artery lesions.
- Bifurcation lesions.
- Ostial lesions.
- Lesions with a difference in proximal and distal reference diameter of >0.5 mm by visual judgement of the coronary angiogram by the treating operator.
- Treatment of in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis.
- History of definite stent thrombosis.
- Lesions in coronary artery bypass grafts.
- Lesions not suitable for OCT or IVUS catheter delivery and imaging, e.g. due to tortuosity or distal localisation.
- Creatinine Clearance ≤ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 as calculated by MDRD formula for estimated GFR.
- Contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor or (if indicated) NOAC and P2Y12 inhibitor.
- Planned non-deferrable major surgery after PCI.
- Known comorbidity associated with a life expectancy <1 year.
- Unable to understand and follow study-related instructions or unable to comply with study protocol.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Technical success
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Percentage of technical success, defined as successful implantation of the BRS in the obstructive coronary lesion.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Angiographic success
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Percentage of angiographic success, defined as <10% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Treatment protocol adherence
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Percentage of treatment protocol adherence, defined as full completion of all PSP and intracoronary imaging steps during implantation procedure.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Optimal scaffold result
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Percentage of optimal scaffold result on intracoronary imaging, defined as no major edge dissection, no major malexpansion and scaffold expansion >90%.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Additional optimization steps
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Percentage of additional optimization steps (including additional postdilatation, additional BRS implantation, bailout metallic DES implantation, additional intracoronary imaging) to achieve optimal scaffold result.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Target Lesion Failure
Time Frame: 1-year and 3-year post-procedure
|
Estimate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization
|
1-year and 3-year post-procedure
|
|
Scaffold thrombosis
Time Frame: 1-year and 3-year post-procedure
|
Estimate of scaffold thrombosis
|
1-year and 3-year post-procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Minimal scaffold area
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Minimal scaffold area assessed with the final OCT or IVUS measurement
|
End of procedure
|
|
Scaffold malapposition
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Scaffold malapposition as percentage, defined as frequency of incompletely apposed struts (i.e.
struts clearly separated from the vessel wall without any tissue behind the struts with a distance from the adjacent intima of ≥0.2 mm and not associated with any side branch) assessed with the final OCT or IVUS measurement.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Scaffold expansion
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Scaffold expansion as percentage, defined as scaffold area divided by the average of proximal and distal reference lumen areas, assessed with the final OCT or IVUS measurement.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Edge dissection
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Presence of edge dissection assessed with the final OCT or IVUS measurement.
|
End of procedure
|
|
Intra-scaffold plaque protrusion and thrombus
Time Frame: End of procedure
|
Intra-scaffold plaque protrusion and thrombus, defined as any intraluminal mass protruding at least 0.2 mm within the luminal edge of a stent strut, assessed with the final OCT or IVUS measurement.
|
End of procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 4, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2030
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 9, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 18, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 15, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PERFECT RESTORE
- NL-009177 (Other Identifier: CCMO)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.