Intracranial Venous Stenting Evaluation in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in the Early Phase (DIVE IIN EARLY)

October 2, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Direct Intracranial Venous Stenting Evaluation in Patients With Idiopathic INtracranial Hypertension in the Early Phase

This study is aimed at patients suffering from recently discovered intracranial hypertension, caracterized by visual loss, chronic headache and/or tinnitus. The goal is to evaluate if stenting of a specific vein in the brain could decrease the hypertension and improve associated symptoms. Patients will be randomly assigned in either best medical care group (recommended medication associated with weight loss) or interventional group (best medical car + stenting of the specific vein) and will undergo specific follow-up visits after 1, 3 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The DIVE-IIN-EARLY trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether transverse venous sinus stenting is more effective than best medical therapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). The study targets patients with a new diagnosis of IIH with bilateral transverse sinus stenosis or unilateral stenosis of the dominant transverse sinus with a hypoplastic contralateral sinus.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is, in most cases, associated with narrowing of the transverse sinus vein, which may be the cause of increased intracranial blood pressure, resulting in the accumulation and increase in intracranial fluid pressure. This increased pressure is thought to be responsible for papilledema, chronic headaches, and tinnitus, among other symptoms.

Restoring a normal luminal diameter of the transverse sinus using a stent could therefore allow for the rapid restoration of normal intracranial pressures and an improvement in various symptoms.

Stent implantation in the transverse sinus is now part of standard care, but no large-scale clinical trial has formally established the superiority of the technique compared to the standard of care (drug therapy combined with weight gain). This study aims to provide evidence on the potential benefits of transverse venous sinus stenting as a treatment option for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which could significantly change the current management approach to this disease.

Usual medication for this condition is acetazolamide, but it's efficacy as well as it's tolerance is mostly poor. By proposing stenting in the early phase of the disease, one could avoid long term symptoms such as loss of vision and chronic headache.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Recruiting
        • Chu De Montpellier Hopital Gui De Chauliac
        • Contact:
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Reims
        • Contact:
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Toulouse
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 years old at inclusion.
  2. Subject with definite new diagnosis (˂ 3 months) of IIH satisfying the modified Dandy criteria (A to E)
  3. Subject with intracranial TVS stenosis on dominant transverse sinus and hypoplastic contralateral one (or bilateral TVS stenosis) diagnosed on MRI
  4. Normal MRI findings excepted intracranial TVS stenosis or IIH related abnormalities
  5. Subject with ophthalmologic IIH symptoms and signs (RNFL ≥ 130 µm, Frisen score ≥ 2, and absence of differential diagnostic)
  6. Subject without macular ganglion cells atrophy seen on OCT
  7. Patient having received information about data collection and having signed and dated an Informed Consent Form
  8. Subjects must be able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures
  9. Subjects must be covered by public health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject previously treated with acetazolamide for IIH
  2. Known contrast product, Nickel, titanium allergy
  3. Exposure to an oral drug, substance, or disorder that has been associated with elevation of intracranial pressure within 2 months of diagnosis (lithium, vitamin A, tetracycline and related compounds)
  4. History of intracranial venous thrombosis or intracranial neoplasia
  5. Fulminant decrease of visual acuity due to the IIH defined as a visual loss (of the most seriously impaired eye) of at least 3/10 (from corrected vision) within 4 weeks, in absence of any other ophthalmologic pathology and Mean Deficit of visual field superior to -10 dB
  6. Macular ganglion cells atrophy seen on OCT
  7. Optic nerve atrophy
  8. Amblyopia
  9. Refractive error greater ±8 sphere or more than ±3 in cylinder in either eye if there are abnormalities in funduscopy (optic disc tilt, staphyloma), previous glaucoma, other disorders causing visual loss
  10. Pregnancy: if a woman is of childbearing potential a urine or serum beta HCG test is positive
  11. Patient with a severe or fatal comorbidity that will likely prevent improvement or follow-up or that will render the procedure unlikely to benefit the patient.
  12. Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), etc.)
  13. Life expectancy under 6 months
  14. Chronic IIH
  15. Patients with renal failure (creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl and/or creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min, except if patient is already on hemodialysis)
  16. History of previously implanted intra-cranial sinus stent
  17. Previous gastric bypass surgery
  18. Contra-indication to general anesthesia
  19. Contra-indication to aspirin, clopidogrel or other P2Y12 anti-aggregant
  20. History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other severe respiratory disease
  21. History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
  22. History of atrial fibrillation or other risks of stroke
  23. Cerebral vascular lesions (arteriovenous malformation, arteriovenous fistula, aneurysms, significant stenosis of extra- or intra-cranial vessels other than the targeted venous sinus stenosis, intracranial artery dissection, etc.).
  24. Anatomical anomaly of the venous sinus which would prevent safe catheterization and stenting
  25. Subject who are in a dependency or employment with the sponsor or the investigator
  26. Participation in another clinical trial or administration of an unapproved drug within the last 4 weeks before the screening date
  27. Subject protected according to the French Public Health Code (e.g. patients under law protection, prisoners, pregnant, parturient or lactating women, and patients under guardianship/curatorship)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: best medical care
Acetazolamide and recommended weight loss
Acetazolamide will be introduced at the time of papilledema discovery. Weight loss will be recommended.
Other Names:
  • Weight loss
  • Acetazolamide
Experimental: Experimental (stenting, neuro-radiological intervention)
Stenting of the tranverse sinus vein
Transverse venous sinus will be stented by neuro-radiological intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of patients with resolved papilledema and normalization of intra-cranial pressure
Time Frame: 3 months
Rate of patients with resolved papilledema (defined as Frisén scale grade 0-1 on OCT, without ganglion cells damage, and RNFL ˂ 130 µm) and normalization of intra-cranial pressure (defined as ≤ 25 cm H20 or 18 mmHg measured on lumbar puncture) at 3 months. Papilledema will be studied in the most affected eye.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIT-6 grading scale score
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change in mean HIT-6 grading scale score (patient's questionnaire containing 6 questions to evaluate the severity of headache)
3 and 12 months
Monthly headache days
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change in monthly headache days (within the last month) reported on patients' dairy
3 and 12 months
THI score
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change in THI (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory) score
3 and 12 months
Visual field
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change in decibel of Mean Deficit visual field assessed on automated perimetry in both eyes with Humphrey Field Analyzer SITA Standard 24-2 test pattern. Each participant will have at least 2 initial visual field examinations conducted at least 30 minutes apart. The 2 Perimetric Mean Deviation (PMD) measurements will be averaged.
3 and 12 months
Visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change of visual acuity score evaluated on ETDRS (far vision) at 4 meters and reproducible lighting, and Parinaud scale (near vision) using the best optical correction
3 and 12 months
Papilledema
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change of papilledema assessed on Frisen score and RNFL on OCT
3 and 12 months
Patient's autonomy
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Change in quality of life assessed on EQ5D questionnaire
3 and 12 months
Patient's cognition
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
12 months
Cognition
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH)

Clinical Trials on Best medical care

Subscribe