Cognitive Rehabilitation With Virtual Reality in Parkinson Disease (OPERA)

April 3, 2025 updated by: Anna Estraneo, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Integrated biO-cooPErative Robotic plAtform for Virtual Cognitive-motor Training in Parkinson's Disease

The OPERA Clinical Study is an interventional, single-arm, open-label pilot clinical study that aims to evaluate the usability of an innovative bio-cooperative robotic platform (PRoBio) for cognitive rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The study focuses on assessing the effectiveness and acceptability of the system in a pilot study involving patients undergoing a structured cognitive rehabilitation program.

PRoBio is an advanced rehabilitation platform that integrates the TIAGo robotic system, developed by PAL Robotics, with the VRRS COMPACT virtual reality rehabilitation system, designed by Khymeia. TIAGo is provided by a robotic arm and RGB-D camera that allow the collection of biomechanical and psychophysiological data, which are then used to personalize the treatment through the cognitive tasks provided by the VRRS COMPACT. The pilot study involves patients with PD-MCI, who will undergo a four-week rehabilitation program with ProBio, consisting of three weekly sessions of virtual cognitive training. The primary objective is to assess the usability and compliance of the system by evaluating user experience, ease of interaction, and engagement levels among both patients and rehabilitation professionals, as well as evaluating its ability to monitor biomechanical and psychophysiological parameters during treatment. This assessment will be conducted using a multimodal sensor system, which includes an RGB-D camera integrated into the UCBM TIAGo robot and wearable sensors designed to measure heart rate, respiratory rate, and galvanic skin response. The data collected through these sensors will be analyzed offline to personalize cognitive rehabilitation treatments in subsequent sessions. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the accuracy and response times of patients while performing cognitive exercises, as recorded by the VRRS system. Furthermore, the study will explore the potential effects of PRoBio treatment on the cognitive functions of patients with Parkinson's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment (PD-MCI) as a possible future rehabilitation to include in the clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The pilot study will be conducted at two clinical centers, the Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS sites in Sant'Angelo dei Lombardi (AV) and Florence (FI).

The first step involves obtaining informed consent from all participants. Following this, a baseline assessment (T0) will be carried out, including the collection of demographic and anamnesis data, as well as cognitive and psychological evaluations. These assessments will help confirm eligibility criteria and serve as a pre-treatment evaluation for enrolled patients. The assessment tools include the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Rating Scale, the Stroop Color Word Test, the Trail Making Test (A and B), the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory.

Once baseline evaluations are completed, patients will begin a structured cognitive rehabilitation program using the ProBio platform, which integrates the UCBM TIAGo service robot with the VRRS COMPACT telerehabilitation system developed by Khymeia. The rehabilitation program will consist of three weekly sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, for a total duration of four weeks. The cognitive tasks and activities will be tailored to the individual patient's abilities to provide a personalized treatment plan aimed at improving specific cognitive functions. During the rehabilitation sessions, UCBM TIAGo will continuously monitor the patient's physical and emotional state, collecting data through advanced sensors and its integrated RGB-D camera. These data will be analyzed offline to adjust the complexity and intensity of exercises for subsequent sessions based on individual responses.

Throughout the treatment, several parameters will be recorded. The accuracy and response times in cognitive exercises will be documented in reports generated by the VRRS software. Biomechanical parameters, such as movement amplitude and speed, will be measured using the RGB-D camera, while psychophysiological parameters, including respiratory rate, heart rate, and skin conductance, will be monitored via wearable sensors. Based on these parameters, the VRRS system will provide real-time visual and vocal feedback to the patient regarding response accuracy and exercise execution. Additionally, at the end of each session, the bio-cooperative robot TIAGo will verbally interact with the patient to assess their experience, including perceived enjoyment, task comprehension, and ease of execution.

At the end of the four-week rehabilitation program, a final evaluation (T1) will be conducted using the same cognitive and psychological assessment tools applied at baseline. This will include the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Rating Scale, the Stroop Color Word Test, the Trail Making Test, the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. The study also aims to explore the potential of integrating robotic bio-cooperative platforms into routine clinical rehabilitation settings, providing insights into their feasibility and effectiveness for future large-scale applications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Avellino
      • Sant'Angelo dei Lombardi, Avellino, Italy, 83054

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of mild Parkinson's Disease (Hoehn & Yahr stage II-III);
  • Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to Litvan et al. (2012) criteria for PD-MCI;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease Dementia, atypical parkinsonisms, secondary parkinsonisms, or mixed forms;
  • Severe depressive syndrome
  • Absence of signed informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Training with PRoBio in Parkinson's Disease
Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment will undergo a cognitive rehabilitation program using the PRoBio robotic platform. The intervention consists of 3 sessions per week (45 minutes each) for 4 weeks. The PRoBio system includes virtual reality exercises and real-time feedback based on motor and emotional responses.
The intervention consists of a cognitive rehabilitation program using the PRoBio platform, a bio-cooperative robotic system integrating virtual reality and real-time multisensory feedback. The PRoBio platform includes a robotic arm (TIAGo), a virtual reality interface (VRRS), and sensors to monitor biomechanical, cognitive, and emotional parameters during training.
Other Names:
  • TIAGo
  • COMPACT VRRS
  • Robotic Bio-Cooperative Training
  • Virtual Reality Rehabilitation with PRoBio
  • PRoBio platform

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale (SUS) - Patient Reported Outcome
Time Frame: Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
Assessment of system usability using the 10-item SUS scale. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better usability.
Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
eHealth Usability Benchmarking Instrument (HUBBI)
Time Frame: Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
Assessment of system usability using the HUBBI questionnaire. Items rated on a 7-point scale; higher scores indicate better usability.
Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
User Experience Questionnaire - Short Version (UEQ-S)
Time Frame: Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
Evaluation of pragmatic and hedonic user experience with the UEQ-S. Each item rated from -3 to +3; higher scores indicate more positive experience.
Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and UTAUT Scores
Time Frame: Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
Evaluation of perceived usefulness and ease of use via TAM and UTAUT scales. Items rated on 5-point Likert scales.
Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)
Time Frame: Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)
Evaluation of cognitive workload using the NASA-TLX scale. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher workload.
Week 4 (post-treatment, T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Session Attendance and Treatment Adherence
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Evaluation of the acceptance of the PRoBio platform by patients and clinicians, based on session attendance, treatment adherence, and system usability for operators. Additionally, the ability of PRoBio to collect biomechanical and psychophysiological data during treatment will be assessed. These include response accuracy and reaction times (collected by VRRS), movement amplitude and velocity (via RGB-D camera), and physiological indicators (heart rate, respiratory rate, and skin conductance) recorded through wearable sensors. These data will be used offline to customize the rehabilitation sessions.
Weeks 1-4
Response Accuracy in Cognitive Tasks (VRRS Software)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Accuracy rate in exercises performed during each session, as recorded by VRRS.
Weeks 1-4
Reaction Times in Cognitive Tasks (VRRS Software)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Mean reaction times (ms) recorded during cognitive tasks using the PRoBio platform.
Weeks 1-4
Movement Amplitude (RGB-D Camera Analysis)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Mean amplitude of upper limb movements captured via RGB-D camera.
Weeks 1-4
Movement Velocity (RGB-D Camera Analysis)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Mean velocity of arm movements during tasks, as measured by RGB-D camera.
Weeks 1-4
Heart Rate During Sessions (Wearable Sensors)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Average heart rate recorded during rehabilitation sessions.
Weeks 1-4
Respiratory Rate During Sessions (Wearable Sensors)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Average respiratory rate recorded during sessions.
Weeks 1-4
Skin Conductance Level (SCL) During Sessions
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4
Average SCL value measured by wearable sensors as indicator of emotional arousal.
Weeks 1-4

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Function - Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
PD-CRS scores will be collected to evaluate changes in cognitive performance. Scores range from 0 to 134; higher scores indicate better cognition.
Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Executive Function - Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Performance on SCWT will be measured by response times and error rate.
Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Cognitive Flexibility - Trail Making Test (TMT A & B)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Completion time (in seconds) for TMT-A and TMT-B will be recorded.
Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Quality of Life - Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Quality of life will be measured through the PDQ-39. Scores range from 0 to 100; lower scores indicate better quality of life.
Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Mood - Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Scores range from 0 to 15; higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Anxiety - Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)
Scores range from 0 to 20; higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Baseline (T0) and Week 4 (T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Estraneo, MD, Fondazione Don Gnocchi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPERA (Alias Study Number)
  • PNRR - AGE-IT SPOKE 1 e SPOKE (Other Grant/Funding Number: Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca (MUR))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) to be shared include demographic variables (age, gender, disease stage), usability and acceptability questionnaire scores, cognitive task performance (accuracy and reaction times), biomechanical parameters (e.g., movement amplitude and velocity), and psychophysiological data (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, skin conductance) collected during the intervention.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be granted to qualified researchers affiliated with academic or clinical institutions, for the purpose of secondary analyses, meta-analyses, or method development. Requests must be submitted in writing to the principal investigator and will be evaluated by the study team. Data will be shared via secure file transfer methods upon approval.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Clinical Trials on Cognitve rehabilitation with virtual reality and robotic arm

Subscribe