Cryoneurolysis vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain

April 11, 2025 updated by: Medical Pain Management Services, PLLC

A Prospective, Single-center, Open-label, Pilot Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Clinical Effectiveness of Lateral Branch Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain

This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, pilot study in adult subjects with chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. Thirty (30) subjects are planned for initial enrollment and will be randomized 1:1 to receive ioveraº cryoneurolysis or radiofrequency ablation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, randomized, pilot study in adult subjects with chronic SIJ pain. Thirty (30) subjects are planned for initial enrollment and will be randomized 1:1 to receive ioveraº cryoneurolysis or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

This study is designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of iovera° cryoneurolysis in adult subjects with chronic SIJ pain. Furthermore, the study will assess the feasibility of the outcome measurements employed, construct a foundation for sample size calculation, and the acceptability/practicality of conducting an efficacy randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Randomization to treatment groups according to the randomization assignment will be performed on the day of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects at least 18 years of age at Screening
  2. Primary complaint of buttock or axial low-back below L5 suggestive of unilateral or bilateral SIJ-mediated back pain
  3. Positive SIJ provocative testing (at least two tests must be positive)

    1. Thigh thrust test
    2. Distraction test
    3. Gaenslen's test
    4. Compression test
    5. Sacral thrust test
  4. Low back or buttock pain is chronic (i.e., ≥ 3 months' duration)
  5. Low back or buttock pain is moderate to severe (score of ≥ 4 to ≤ 9) on the 0 to 10 NRS at Screening
  6. Low back or buttock pain causes functional impairment (≥ 30% on ODI) at Screening
  7. Successful trial of one diagnostic sacroiliac joint block with local anesthetic and steroids that results in at least 50% relief of primary (index) pain for the duration of the local anesthetic used
  8. Failure of at least three months of conservative non-operative therapy (e.g., physical therapy, chiropractic care, sleep hygiene, weight loss, spinal injections, NSAIDs, physician-directed exercise program or other appropriate analgesics)
  9. Able to provide informed consent, adhere to the study visit schedule, and complete all study assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active workers' compensation, personal injury, Social Security disability insurance (SSDI), or other litigation/compensation related to the spine
  2. Serious spinal disorders (verified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) that may impact outcomes, including any of the following:

    1. Suspected cauda equina syndrome (e.g., bowel/bladder dysfunction)
    2. Infection
    3. Tumor
    4. Traumatic fracture
    5. Systemic inflammatory spondyloarthropathy
    6. Lumbar radiculopathy/radiculitis (i.e., root irritation and deficit)
    7. Neurogenic claudication
  3. Prior SIJ fusion surgery across the SI joint
  4. Comorbidity that, in the judgment of the Investigator, may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study including lumbar radiculopathy and neuropathic pain disorder
  5. Currently pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant during the study
  6. Known contraindication to study device, including any of the following:

    1. Cryoglobulinemia
    2. Paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria
    3. Cold urticaria
    4. Raynaud's disease
    5. Open and/or infected wounds at or near the treatment site
    6. Coagulopathy
  7. Previous participation in an iovera° study
  8. Severe chronic pain disorder that in the opinion of the investigator may impact study outcomes
  9. Presence of any of the following:

    1. Spinal neurostimulator
    2. Intrathecal analgesic drug pump
  10. Current manifestation of poorly controlled mental illness or catastrophizing that in the opinion of the investigator may meaningfully impact treatment outcomes, including any of the following:

    a. Mood disorder (e.g., depression, bipolar) i. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ≥ 12 at Screening b. Psychotic disorder (e.g., schizophrenia) c. Catastrophizing i. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score >30 at Screening

  11. Subject received other spine interventions/therapies in the 30 days prior to block administration (e.g., spinal injections, minimally invasive therapies, surgical therapies) at the intended lumbar treatment levels
  12. Subject received radiofrequency ablation ≤ 6 months before study enrollment at the intended treatment levels
  13. History, suspicion, or clinical manifestation of:

    1. Alcohol abuse or dependence
    2. Illicit drug use
    3. Opioid abuse or dependence (≥40 mg MED PO/day in past 30 days) Given the COVID-19 pandemic, the subject must be medically fit/cleared for surgery by the investigator. If there is a concern about a subject's recent or potential exposure to COVID-19, or if the subject is not medically fit/cleared for surgery due to suspected COVID-19 illness/symptoms (or other serious illness), the subject must be excluded per Exclusion criterion #4.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cryoneurolysis
Subjects will receive iovera° cryoneurolysis to the nerves of the sacroiliac joint
The iovera° system consists of a reusable, portable Handpiece, along with single-patient use sterile Smart Tips (i.e., cryoprobes) and disposable nitrous oxide (N2O) cartridges. The iovera° system produces the desired effect through initiation of a cooling cycle. Each cooling cycle is initiated by fully inserting the Smart Tip into the selected procedure site and activating the cryogen flow. The Smart Tip needles are made of stainless steel and have a closed tip, fully enclosing the cryogen. The "STT21180STIM" Smart Tip will be used in this study.
Other Names:
  • iovera
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency ablation
Subjects will receive RFA to nerves of the sacroiliac joint
Radiofrequency ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses heat at the lumbosacral spine to destroy the target spinal nerves.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of Cryoneurolysis as Compared to Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Safety will be assessed as the number of subjects with reported treatment-related adverse related to cryoneurolysis or RFA.
0-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction With Pain Management
Time Frame: 12 months
Subject satisfaction with pain management as measured on a scale ranging from 1) extremely dissatisfied 2) dissatisfied 3) neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4) satisfied 5) extremely satisfied.
12 months
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 0-12 Months

Subjects will evaluate their pain in the low back region using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain.

Subjects will evaluate how much pain they are currently experiencing and their average pain level over the past 24 hours.

0-12 Months
Functional disability
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Function disability will be measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. The score ranges from 0-50, with lower scores reflecting milder disability.
0-12 months
Concomitant medication use
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Concomitant medication use will be collected per participant medication diary.
0-12 months
Success and failure rate of study interventions
Time Frame: Day 180

Treatment success or failure will be determined at Day 180 (± 5 days) as described by Birkenmaier et al.:

  1. Full success of treatment is when pain is reduced to 50% or less of pre-treatment levels
  2. Partial success of treatment is when pain is reduced between 51-69% of pre-treatment levels
  3. Failure of treatment is when pain is reduced to 70% or greater of pre-treatment levels
Day 180
Shor-form 12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: Screening, Day 90 (± 5 days), Day 180 (± 5 days), Day 270 (± 7 days), Day 360 (± 7 days)
Health-related quality of life will be measured by the short-form (SF) 12. The SF-12 is a self administered 12-item questionnaire that assesses an individual's physical and mental health status across eight domains. Total scores range form 0-100 with scores above 50 indicating better-than-average health-related quality of life, and scores below 50 indicating below-average health.
Screening, Day 90 (± 5 days), Day 180 (± 5 days), Day 270 (± 7 days), Day 360 (± 7 days)
Patients' Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 12 months
The Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is an 11-point self-report scale assessing overall changes in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and quality of life, ranging from 0 to 10, where higher values indicate worse outcomes.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lost work days
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Lost work days related to low back pain will be self-reported to evaluate the impact of cryoneurolysis on the number of lost workdays compared to radiofrequency ablation.
0-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Ferrillo, DO, The Albany & Saratoga Centers For Pain Management

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Clinical Trials on Cryoneurolysis

Subscribe