CONDUIT™ Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Cage System in Lumbar Degenerative Disease

April 15, 2025 updated by: University College Dublin

Clinical/Radiological Outcomes Associated With CONDUIT™ Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Cage System With Supplemental Fixation for Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease at One or Two Contiguous Spinal Levels From L2-S1

This will be a prospective, multi-centre study at a National Tertiary Referral Centre for spinal trauma and spinal cord injuries, serving a catchment area of 5 million people. This study will follow patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure. This trial seeks to evaluate the performance of this CE-marked device, and to assess outcomes in frail and non-frail patient cohorts. The CONDUIT™ ALIF Cage System are intervertebral body fusion devices intended for use for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients. The devices are 3D printed cellular titanium implants that feature 80% porous macro-, micro- and nanostructures, are designed to mimic cortical and cancellous bone, and facilitate fusion. This pilot study hypothesizes that the use of CONDUIT ALIF Cage system to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease will achieve results comparable to historical cases using SYNFIX Systems.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective, multi-centre study at a National Tertiary Referral Centre for spinal trauma and spinal cord injuries, serving a catchment area of 5 million people. This study will follow patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure at the Mater Misericordiae University and Mater Private Hospitals using the CONDUIT™ ALIF Cage System. This trial seeks to evaluate the performance of this CE-marked device, and to assess outcomes in frail and non-frail patient cohorts. The CONDUIT™ ALIF Cage System are intervertebral body fusion devices intended for use for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients. The devices are 3D printed cellular titanium implants that feature 80% porous macro-, micro- and nanostructures, are designed to mimic cortical and cancellous bone, and facilitate fusion.

In spine fusion procedures, bone is encouraged to grow in order to fuse vertebrae of the spine together to relieve pain or increase stability. The likelihood of a successful fusion is thought to be influenced by multiple factors. Patient-related factors influencing fusion success include comorbidities such as osteoporosis or osteopenia, diabetes, and obesity. Factors affecting the inflammatory response, such as rheumatoid arthritis or long-term steroid use may also increase the likelihood of fusion failure. Fusion success can also be influenced by age, frailty, functional status, history of smoking or steroid use. The surgical approach may also affect fusion rate. It is thought that a posterior approach may result in higher fusion failure rates (20-30%. However, the posterior approach may be considered more appropriate for older patients with multilevel fusion, who may have a higher rate of comorbidities which affect fusion rate.

Frailty is a clinically recognizable syndrome comprised of declining physiological reserve, characterized by decreased resilience to adverse health outcomes. Fried et al have defined frailty as meeting three out of five of the following criteria: low grip strength, low energy, slow walking speed, low physical activity, unintentional weight loss. The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is another method of measuring frailty commonly used in clinical settings. It has been shown to predict the occurrence of adverse outcomes following various orthopaedic surgeries. The five comorbidities included in the mFI-5 are a history of hypertension, COPD, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and a non-independent functional status. This pilot study hypothesizes that the use of CONDUIT ALIF Cage system to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease will achieve results comparable to historical cases using SYNFIX Systems.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Leinster
      • Dublin, Leinster, Ireland, D07R2WY
        • Recruiting
        • Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Joseph Butler, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Stacey Darwish, MBChB
        • Contact:
          • Jake McDonnell, MRCS
        • Contact:
          • Conor McNamee, MB BCh BAO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients (>18 years old) with lumbar degenerative disease requiring surgical intervention and stabilisation with instrumentation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 18 years old
  • Consenting patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure whom the Conduit cage system is appropriate will be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Non-surgical candidates, patients with contraindications to surgery (e.g. medical comorbidities, known infection, pregnancy etc.),
  • Patients with established osteoporosis
  • Long-term, systemic steroid use
  • Systemic diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, HIV, etc.),
  • Patients unwilling or unable to give informed consent, or patients unwilling or unable to complete Health-related quality of (HRQOL) outcome life measures at the specified study time points pre- and post-operatively.
  • Subjects who have a history of drug or alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SYNFIX COHORT
This cohort will be composed of historical, retrospective data (70 patients total) of patients who underwent surgical stabilisation for lumbar degenerative disease using the SYNFIX system, with supplemental posterior fixation.
Arm Description: Group/Cohort Description: This cohort is composed of patients who will be prospectively enrolled (35 total). These patients will undergo spinal stabilisation for lumbar degenerative disease using the CONDUIT ALIF cage system with supplemental posterior fixation. This device is FDA approved thus this is post market observational intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic Fusion at 24 months as inferred by Presence of Segmental Stability and Absence of Mechanical Failure on Xray/CT
Time Frame: 24 months

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the radiographic assessment of fusion at 24 months postoperatively. This radiographic assessment will consist of plain Xrays preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 24 months postoperatively. These will include a combination of anterior, lateral, flexion and extension views images of lumbar spine used to infer stability.

Fusion failure (pseudarthrosis) will be defined as signs of mechanical failure (such as peri-implant radiolucency/haloing, screw/rod fracture, etc.) or <50% bridging trabecular bone on CT scan at 12 months postoperatively. Assessment of fusion will be conducted by a musculoskeletal radiologist and 2 independent fellowship trained spine surgeons.

24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Patient Reported Pain as Measured Using Visual Analogue Scale Score Throughout Follow up Period
Time Frame: 24 months

At predetermined intervals (preoperative, at time of discharge and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow up), subjective patient pain will be recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale which ranges from 0 to 10 with a score of 10 indicating the most severe possible pain and a score of 0 indicating no pain is present.

A secondary objective of this study is to prospectively gather patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in terms of pain and function

24 months
Changes in Patient Reported Function as Measured Using Short Form 12 Throughout Follow up Period
Time Frame: 24 months
At predetermined intervals (preoperative, at time of discharge and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow up), subjective patient function will be recorded using the Short Form 12 which returns component scores representing both physical and mental status. These scores are adjusted and compare versus averages within the United States population. Both scores have an average score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate worse function while higher scores indicate greater function.
24 months
Changes in Patient Reported Function as Measured Using Oswestry Disability Index Throughout Follow up Period
Time Frame: 24 months
At predetermined intervals (preoperative, at time of discharge and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow up), subjective patient function will be recorded using the Oswestry Disability Index which ranges from 0 to 100 disability with a score of 100% indicating complete disability rendering a patient bed bound and a score of 0% indicating minimal disability is present.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Butler, PhD, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Analysis / breakdown of IPD is not felt to benefit study results or outcomes based on the study methodology.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Clinical Trials on CONDUIT

Subscribe