- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06945250
A Multimedia Presentation to Augment the Informed Consent Process for Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Scheduled Caesarian Delivery
The informed consent process is an important part of any surgical and anesthetic intervention. It is also perhaps the most intellectually demanding portion of interacting with the healthcare system for patients. Competent patients have full autonomy over which treatments they receive, and making an informed choice about the decision to undergo a treatment requires at minimum a discussion of the proposed intervention, its risks and benefits, and alternatives to the proposed intervention.
The objective is to improve the anesthesia informed consent process for patients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery through the use of a pre-recorded audiovisual presentation that discusses the logistical aspects of perioperative care and the risks and benefits of anesthesia which is provided to patients prior to meeting their anesthesiologist.
The hypothesis is that the use of an audiovisual presentation which explains the purpose and nature of anesthesia for Caesarean delivery provided to the patient at least 24 hours prior to their procedure will result in a 10% increase in the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making as measured by the Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication and Treatment Decision Making Effectiveness (COMRADE) tool.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or over on the day of the procedure
- Able to provide verbal and written informed consent for participation in the study
- Primarily English-speaking patients (the audiovisual presentation will be available only in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal or inability to participate or provide informed consent
- Primarily non-English speaking patients
- At the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist of record due to medical complexity
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Intervention Group: Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a link to the audiovisual presentation via e-mail to review prior to coming into the hospital for caesarean section.
|
Participants in this group will receive the audiovisual presentation
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Control Group: Participants randomized to the control group will not receive the link to the audiovisual presentation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
COMRADE survey score
Time Frame: 1 Day after delivery of baby
|
COMRADE score for risk communication and treatment decision making on a 100-point scale, ranging from 0 (decision-making not informed at all (poor)) to 100 (most informed decision possible (good))
|
1 Day after delivery of baby
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Demographic factors associated with increase in informed decision-making
Time Frame: 1 Day after delivery of baby
|
Demographic factors associated with increase in informed decision-making including age, education level, history of prior Caesarean delivery, history of other anesthetics (such as labor epidurals or general anesthetics)
|
1 Day after delivery of baby
|
|
Level of subjective anxiety associated with the proposed anesthetic
Time Frame: 1 Day after delivery of baby
|
Level of subjective anxiety associated with the proposed anesthetic based on a scale of 1-5 (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree).
|
1 Day after delivery of baby
|
|
Level of subjective fear associated with the proposed anesthetic
Time Frame: 1 Day after delivery of baby
|
Level of subjective fear associated with the proposed anesthetic measured on a scale of 1-5 (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree)
|
1 Day after delivery of baby
|
|
Level of satisfaction with the anesthetic informed consent process
Time Frame: 1 Day after delivery
|
Level of satisfaction with the anesthetic informed consent process based on a scale of 1-5 (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree).
|
1 Day after delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eleanor Kenny, MD, Northwestern Univesity
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Holmes-Rovner M, Kinnersley P, Houston H, Russell I. The development of COMRADE--a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):311-22. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00055-7.
- Cassady JF Jr, Wysocki TT, Miller KM, Cancel DD, Izenberg N. Use of a preanesthetic video for facilitation of parental education and anxiolysis before pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999 Feb;88(2):246-50. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199902000-00004.
- Wisselo TL, Stuart C, Muris P. Providing parents with information before anaesthesia: what do they really want to know? Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Apr;14(4):299-307. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01222.x.
- Atsaidis Z, Antel R, Guadagno E, Wiseman J, Poenaru D. Understanding the effectiveness of consent processes and conversations in pediatric surgery: A systematic-scoping review. J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Dec;57(12):834-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
- Garden AL, Merry AF, Holland RL, Petrie KJ. Anaesthesia information--what patients want to know. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Oct;24(5):594-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400516.
- Jawaid M, Farhan M, Masood Z, Husnain S. Preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed? Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(9):25-30. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
- Tait AR, Teig MK, Voepel-Lewis T. Informed consent for anesthesia: a review of practice and strategies for optimizing the consent process. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):832-42. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0188-8. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00222960
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caesarean Section
-
Ashulia Women and Children HospitalCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedCaesarean SectionEgypt
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalCompletedCaesarean SectionTaiwan
-
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedCaesarean Section | Caesarean Section; InfectionUnited Kingdom
-
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey UniversityRecruitingCaesarean SectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Büşra KüçüktürkmenNot yet recruiting
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminatedCaesarean SectionUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentUnknownCaesarean SectionNetherlands
-
Sichuan Provincial People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Experimental Audio Visual
-
Fondazione David Chiossone - Impresa SocialeIRCCS AOU San Martino, Genova, ItalyNot yet recruitingHemianopia | Visual Field Defect Following Cerebrovascular Accident
-
Brooke Army Medical CenterCompletedHysterectomy | Informed ConsentUnited States
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliUniversity of BolognaRecruitingSchizophrenia DisordersItaly
-
McLaren Health CareCompletedPediatric Preoperative AnxietyUnited States
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoCompletedStress | Sickle Cell Disease
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Recruiting
-
University of LahoreCompletedAudio-Visual Triage System | Anxiety Levels | COVID-19 Spread | GAD-7 Score | Healthcare Professionals | Screening StrategyPakistan
-
Visior Technologies Ltd.UnknownCerebral Arterial DiseasesIsrael
-
University of IowaCompletedInformed ConsentUnited States
-
Well Living Lab, Inc.Mayo Clinic; Delos Living LLCRecruiting