An Integrated Neurophysiological Approach Toward the Early Detection of Psychiatric Disorders

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by cognitive decline, social withdrawal, and positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions. Research suggests that SCZ and schizotypy exist along a continuum, with shared structural and behavioral abnormalities, the latter of which encompass the sensory and perceptual domain, often in the form of altered multisensory integration, as seen in tasks like the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion (SIFI). Individuals with schizotypal traits or SCZ show enlarged temporal binding windows (TBW) of cross-modal integration, affecting perceptual accuracy and multisensory judgments. However, whether these deficits stem from overactive top-down modulation or weakened bottom-up sensory precision remains unclear.

The current study seeks to address these questions, by asking participants (healthy individuals screened as for their schizotypal traits, and patients suffering from SCZ) to complete a modified version of the SIFI, as well as an audiovisual temporal order judgment (TOJ) task. Cross-modal performance will be assessed via signal detection theory (SDT) metrics and psychometric modeling to estimate individual TBWs, thereby assaying audiovisual processing abilities along the schizotypal continuum

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is among the most debilitating syndromes within the neuropsychiatric domain, with patients suffering from this condition displaying a rich nosographic characterization. Besides, anhedonia, social withdrawal, and a progressive cognitive decline, positive manifestations such as delusions and hallucinations are perhaps the hallmark symptomatological features underlying this disorder. Notably, prodromal stages that entail subclinical cognitive and/or psychotic symptoms have often been shown to anticipate SCZ onset, corroborating a dimensional approach toward the understanding of such psychiatric disorder. Indeed, it has been proposed that schizotypal traits exist within the general population and that schizotypy and SCZ may correspond to quantitative poles within the same continuum, with the former (i.e., individuals characterized with high schizotypal traits, HST) including subjects displaying many SCZ-related subthreshold clinical signs, and thus, more likely to develop the latter. However, no reliable biomarker to early detect such psychosis-prone individuals has been so far, leaving clinicians without pre-emptive policies toward risk mitigation.

It should be nonetheless highlighted that both demeaned microstructural and white matter integrity have been reported in schizotypy and SCZ alike, the magnitude of which predicting the severity of positive symptoms at the individual level. Given the pivotal role these neuroanatomical features play in relaying electrical signals across the brain, it is not surprising that SCZ patients, as well as HST individuals, oftentimes exhibit aberrant oscillatory dynamics within the low-frequency ranges, such as in the alpha band (7-13 Hz). These brain oscillations are the dominant rhythm in both the resting and active brain. As such, they have been found to subserve many functions closely tied to sensory processing. Among multifold operational features these rhythms appear to be endowed with, their occipital cycling speed (i.e., individual alpha frequency peak, also known as IAF) has been recently associated with the efficiency by which sensory information is integrated or segregated, according to the task at hand . In agreement with the discrete sampling hypothesis of perception, the faster (or slower) these rhythms oscillate, the higher (or lower) the observers' visual sampling rate and their perceptual or cognitive accuracy.

Of note, this electrocortical index bears trait-like features that have been shown to parametrize perceptual performance, especially in multisensory contexts.

For instance, the propensity to report an illusory percept in audiovisual tasks such as the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion (SIFI) was found to negatively correlate with the IAF as recorded from occipital loci: the slower the IAF, the greater the number of illusory percepts and vice-versa. These results align with pieces of research showing a critical contribution of alpha oscillatory speed when individuals are asked to perform cross-modal simultaneity judgments and visuo-tactile tasks as well. Intriguingly, evidence for a tie between the IAF and multisensory temporal binding windows (TBW) has been further reinvigorated by data showing slower IAFs in patients suffering from schizophrenia or displaying schizotypal traits. Namely, those clinical and subclinical populations performing poorly at the SIFI, and, more broadly, multisensory paradigms, due to enlarged TBWs.

As for the neurocomputational mechanics subsiding this intricate pattern of alterations, it remains a matter of debate whether they might be driven either by an over-exploitation of auditory-relayed priors, or poor bottom-up sensory processing. Indeed, although alterations in sensory integration/segregation are a core hallmark of SCZ, it is not entirely clear whether such behavioral and cognitive impairments might be due to defective sensory processing (i.e. poor sensory input due to reduced feedforward connectivity), or aberrant perceptual bias mechanisms (i.e. disproportionately high top-down signaling), and to which extent they may be present at prodromal stages of the disease. To this aim, we will therefore investigate the performance of SCZ patients, and individuals displaying either high (HST) or low (LST) schizotypal traits, in a series of tasks relying on multisensory interaction. We will do so by implementing signal detection theory (SDT) matched with logistic fitting, to clarify at a finer-grained level whether alterations in multisensory processes can be accounted for by deficits at the level of sensory input (d'), top-down control (c), or both.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy participants assigned either to the low (LST) or high (HST) schizotypal group will be recruited from the general population, after being screened for their schizotypal traits via the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ, Raine, 1991). Individuals with SPQ scores falling within the first and last quintile of the overall SPQ scores distribution will then be recruited and assigned, respectively, to the LST and HST groups.

SCZ patients will be recruited via the Psychiatric Unit of IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli

Description

Inclusion Criteria (all participants):

  • Normal hearing
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision

Inclusion Criteria (patients):

  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (according to DSM-5)
  • IQ > 70

Exclusion Criteria (all participants):

  • Anamnesis or evidence of any central nervous system alteration

Exclusion Criteria (patients)

  • Current major physical illness
  • Drug dependency/abuse over the last 6 months
  • Unstable pharmacological therapy
  • Comorbidities with other major psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SCZ
Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Around 75 participants will be recruited for this study (25 per each group), and asked to perform two distinct audiovisual tasks (run via Matlab-based automated routines, and presented using a CRT monitor and a pair of loudspeakers) :

  1. TOJ task, in which a white flashing dot, and a basic auditory stimulus, will be presented in close temporal proximity at several stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs, from 30 to 540 ms in steps of 30 ms), with participants asked to report ( after each trial), which stimulus occurred first (task duration estimate: 25 minutes, 30 trials per each SOA)
  2. A modified version of the SIFI (mSIFI), in which the presentation of paired (and temporally close) auditory stimuli will be coupled with the occurrence of either 1 or 2 flashing dots, at several different SOAs (from 30 to 250 ms in steps of 10 ms), with participants asked to report (after each trial), whether they saw 1 vs 2 flashes (task duration estimate: 25 minutes, 30 trials per each SOA)
LST
Healthy individuals displaying low schizotypal traits

Around 75 participants will be recruited for this study (25 per each group), and asked to perform two distinct audiovisual tasks (run via Matlab-based automated routines, and presented using a CRT monitor and a pair of loudspeakers) :

  1. TOJ task, in which a white flashing dot, and a basic auditory stimulus, will be presented in close temporal proximity at several stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs, from 30 to 540 ms in steps of 30 ms), with participants asked to report ( after each trial), which stimulus occurred first (task duration estimate: 25 minutes, 30 trials per each SOA)
  2. A modified version of the SIFI (mSIFI), in which the presentation of paired (and temporally close) auditory stimuli will be coupled with the occurrence of either 1 or 2 flashing dots, at several different SOAs (from 30 to 250 ms in steps of 10 ms), with participants asked to report (after each trial), whether they saw 1 vs 2 flashes (task duration estimate: 25 minutes, 30 trials per each SOA)
HST
Healthy individuals displaying high schizotypal traits

Around 75 participants will be recruited for this study (25 per each group), and asked to perform two distinct audiovisual tasks (run via Matlab-based automated routines, and presented using a CRT monitor and a pair of loudspeakers) :

  1. TOJ task, in which a white flashing dot, and a basic auditory stimulus, will be presented in close temporal proximity at several stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs, from 30 to 540 ms in steps of 30 ms), with participants asked to report ( after each trial), which stimulus occurred first (task duration estimate: 25 minutes, 30 trials per each SOA)
  2. A modified version of the SIFI (mSIFI), in which the presentation of paired (and temporally close) auditory stimuli will be coupled with the occurrence of either 1 or 2 flashing dots, at several different SOAs (from 30 to 250 ms in steps of 10 ms), with participants asked to report (after each trial), whether they saw 1 vs 2 flashes (task duration estimate: 25 minutes, 30 trials per each SOA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporal Binding Window (TBW) length
Time Frame: Right after tasks completion

The temporal binding window (TBW) is a psychophysical construct that reflects an observer's tolerance for temporal asynchrony-a "window" of time within which multisensory stimuli are likely to be perceptually bound or integrated. As such, it serves as a proxy for cross-modal performance.

In both tasks, individual TBWs will be estimated for each participant by fitting gaussian and sigmoidal logistic functions to error rates (i.e., inverse accuracy) and perceptual sensitivity metrics (i.e., d', as computed combining hits and flase alarms according to signal detection theory), respectively, across the asynchrony space (e.g., at each SOA). The width (e.g., standard deviation) of the gaussian function and the inflection point (e.g., midpoint) of the sigmoidal curve will be then derived on a participant-by-participant basis, serving as behavioral indices of TBW span (in milliseconds) for further statistical analyses and comparison between groups.

Right after tasks completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia Disorders

Clinical Trials on Audio-Visual Perceptual Tasks

Subscribe