- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06947018
Impact Evaluation of Türkiye's Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Programme for Elimination of Child Marriage
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Low income, refugee, displaced and disaster affected populations face a variety of protection risks, including higher risk of child, early and forced marriage and unions (CEFMU). This is the case in Türkiye, where low income, refugee populations and those affected by the 2023 earthquake in Southern and Central Türkiye face elevated risk of child marriage. As part of the UNICEF Türkiye Country Office (TCO) commitment to implement comprehensive interventions that aim to contribute to a change in social norms and attitudes towards gender equality, the CO and partners have developed the "Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment for Elimination of Child Marriage" program (hereafter "the program"). The program is an 8-week group-based empowerment and life skills training for adolescent girls aged 12 - 18 years old, a 4-session adolescent boys awareness training and a one-time awareness raising seminar for caregivers. The current trial has the overall objective of evaluating the short-term causal impact of the program with respect to CEFMU and related outcomes for adolescent girls. The trial seeks to answer the following evaluation questions:
- 1) Does the program improve participant adolescent girls' agency, self-confidence, and gender-equitable attitudes (including for CEFMU), and to what extent?
- 2) Does the program improve the household enabling environment, including gender-equitable attitudes (including CEFMU), social support, protective behaviors against CEFMU, and use of social services among participating caregivers and in the broader community, and to what extent?
- 3) Does the program reduce CEFMU for adolescent girls, and to what extent?
- 4) Through which pathways (or combination of pathways) do potential impacts occur?
- 5) Was the program implemented in a manner to maximize potential impacts? and
- 6) What is the return-on-investment (cost-benefit calculation) for the program? The trial design is an individual randomized control trial, allocating 820 households with adolescent girls to either treatment or control on a 1:1 basis. The primary data collection includes a pre- and post-intervention caregiver and adolescent face-to-face survey, as well as a one-time qualitative data collection. The trial results will inform the future operation and scale-up of the program, as well as contribute to the broader evidence base on what works to increase the empowerment of adolescent girls and reduce CEFMU.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Yasemin Kisbu, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +90 532 215 37 90
- Email: ykisbu@unicef.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amber Peterman, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 360-472-1349
- Email: apeterman@unicef.org
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey
- UNICEF Türkiye
-
Contact:
- Irem Derya Caglayan, M.Sc.
- Phone Number: +905342974222
- Email: icaglayan@unicef.org
-
Contact:
- Pinar Öktem Arikan, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +905359237280
- Email: poktem@unicef.org
-
Contact:
- Tuna Kılınç, M.Sc.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria (primary study participant, however note that primary female caregivers and siblings will be invited to participate in the study pending inclusion of primary study participant):
- Adolescent girls aged 12 - 17 years
- Unmarried girls
- Have never previously been exposed to the intervention
- Live in a family or household with at least one adult caregiver
- Live in a family who are social service clients of the implementing partner
- Live in a family who are risk-assessed as 'low' or 'medium' on the family risk assessment tool
- Live in a family which is planning on staying in the catchment area of the intervention in the subsequent 6-months
Exclusion criteria:
- Adolescent girls younger than 12 or older than 17 years
- Girls who are married or cohabiting
- Previously been exposed to the intervention
- Are in institutionalized or non-family-based care
- Live in a family who are not social service clients of the implementing partner
- Live in a family who are risk-assessed as 'high' or 'highest' on the family risk assessment tool
- Live in a family which is planning on moving outside the catchment area of the intervention in the subsequent 6-months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program
Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program for Elimination of Child Marriage
|
The program was developed based on a social behavioural change (SBC) approach in order to change attitudes and behaviours of the participants, consisting of the following main activities on a 6 - 8 week cycle.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Business as usual (delayed intervention, post-trial - if funding allows)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of girls married or cohabiting
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Marriage or cohabitation status measured among adolescent girls
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
Score on new general self-efficacy scale (short form, higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Eight-item scale asking about internal efficacy, with response options on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree, to 5 = strongly agree (score ranges from 8 - 40).
Widely used scale for individual ability to achieve goals across a range of different situations, despite difficulties.
Interpreted as a sub-component of the construct of adolescent girls' agency.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
Score on decision-making scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Ten-item scale asking about freedom to make choices across domains, with response options on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = not at all, to 4 = a large extent (score ranges from 10 - 40).
Adapted from the program version of the women's empowerment in agriculture index (pro-WEAI) to include adolescent-specific questions, previously piloted in Ethiopia among male and female youth.
Interpreted as a sub-component of the construct of adolescent girls' agency.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
Score on voice scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Eight-item scale asking about girls' ability to share feelings and speak up in different scenarios, with response options on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = never, to 4 = all of the time (score ranges from 8 - 32).
Voice scale is adapted from Global Early Adolescent Survey and interpreted as a sub-component of the construct of adolescent girls' agency.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
Score on child marriage attitudes scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Thirteen-item scale developed and piloted in Türkiye by the author team to measure child marriage attitudes, with response options on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree.
The scale is measured among adolescent girls and boys, as well as their caregivers (score ranges from 13 - 52).
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scale of perceived social support (higher is better).
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
The family and friends' sub-scales of the multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) consisting of nine questions answered on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree.
The scale is measured among adolescent girls and ranges from 9 - 36.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
The Balanced Cohesion subscale of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
The Balanced Cohesion subscale of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale is a seven-item scale answered on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.
The scale is measured among caregivers and ranges from 7 - 35.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
The Revised Family Communication Pattern Instrument Conversation Orientation Sub-scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
The Revised Family Communication Pattern Instrument Conversation Orientation Sub-scale measures parent-adolescent communication and is a 15-item scale answered on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.
The scale is administered to caregivers and ranges from 15 - 75.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
Score on willingness to intervene and speak out for girls' scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Willingness to speak out and take action to support girls measured using simple self-reported questions on willingness to speak up against harmful behaviors: 1) child marriage, 2) violence against girls, 3) girls' rights and 4) for girls in times of need.
These four domains are each assessed using one question answered on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree.
The scale is measured among adolescent boys and caregivers and ranges from 4 - 32.
|
Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention
|
|
Linkages to services scale (higher is better)
Time Frame: 8-weeks post-intervention
|
Received assistance or benefits from services measured among adolescent girls and caregivers, collected as a simple sum = 1 if received any services from: 1) health, 2) social, or 3) legal services (ranges from 0 - 3)
|
8-weeks post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Zlata Bruckauf, Ph.D., UNICEF
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- HML2855
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Marriage
-
Wright State University59th Medical Wing; Malcolm Grow Medical Clinics and Surgery Center; Clark University and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Emory UniversityCooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE)Completed
-
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Department of Health and Human ServicesCompletedFamily Relations | MarriageUnited States
-
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research...CARE Bangladesh; Gram Bikash Kendra (GBK); CARE USARecruiting
-
University of Central FloridaDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompleted
-
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Department of Health and Human ServicesCompletedHealthy Marriage | Responsible FatherhoodUnited States
-
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Department of Health and Human ServicesCompletedFamily Relations | MarriageUnited States
-
Auburn UniversityDepartment of Health and Human Services; Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.CompletedHealthy Marriage | Healthy RelationshipUnited States
-
Helen Keller InternationalMount Saint Vincent University; International Development Research Centre,...Active, not recruitingHealth Behavior | Adolescent Behavior | Marriage AgeBangladesh
-
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Department of Health and Human ServicesCompletedParenting | Mother-Child Relations | Family Relations | MarriageUnited States
Clinical Trials on Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); University...RecruitingHIV Infections | Sexual Behavior | Sexually Transmitted Infections (Not HIV or Hepatitis)United States
-
Oregon Research InstituteCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedBreast Cancer | Advanced Solid Tumors | Cowden SyndromeNetherlands, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, United States
-
The Miriam HospitalHassenfeld Child Health Innovation InstituteCompletedChildhood Obesity PreventionUnited States
-
Population Services InternationalFederal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health; Addis Ababa University...Not yet recruitingAdolescent Health | HPV Vaccine Acceptability | HPV Vaccines | Integrated Community-based Intervention Package | Papillomavirus Vaccines | HPV Vaccine Attitudes | Adolescent Health Services | HPV Vaccinations | HPV Vaccine Knowledge
-
University of Massachusetts, AmherstCompleted
-
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Office of Population Affairs; California Department of Public Health, MCAHCompletedTeen Pregnancy PreventionUnited States
-
Saavsus, Inc.National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); National... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingHealthy | Self Efficacy | Knowledge | Self EsteemUnited States
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Recruiting
-
Stanford UniversityCalifornia Department of Developmental ServicesActive, not recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autistic Disorder | Autism | Autism Spectrum Disorders | Autistic Disorders Spectrum | Autistic Spectrum Disorder | Autistic Spectrum DisordersUnited States