Application of the Health Action Process Approach Model Program to Patients With Heart Attacks

April 23, 2025 updated by: Gönül Taşcı, TC Erciyes University

The Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Based on Health Action Process Approach Model on Treatment Compliance, Quality of Life and Functional Capacity Level in Individuals With Myocardial Infarction

This research is conducted to determine whether the nurse-led Health Action Process Approach Model-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program is effective in patients with myocardial infarction. The population of the study will consist of coronary angiography patients with myocardial infarction in the cardiology service of a state hospital. In this study, which is planned as a randomized controlled experimental model, 35 intervention and 35 control groups will be studied. As data collection tools; patient identification form, Laboratory Investigations Monitoring Form, Perceived Stress Scale, Health Action Process Approach Based Participant Assessment Form, Health Action Process Approach Based Myocardial Infarction Risk Factors Participant Assessment Form Functional Capacity Assessment Form, Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale and Turkish Modified Morisky Scale will be used. Health Action Process Approach Modeled Cardiac Rehabilitation Program will be applied to the intervention group and no intervention will be applied to the control group. Data will be collected with data collection tools at 6, 12, 24 weeks. SPSS 25.0 (Stastical Package for Social Science) package program will be used for statistical analysis of the data. Descriptive statistics will be given as number, percentage, mean, standard deviation and median values. The normal distribution of the data of numerical variables will be evaluated by Shapiro Wilk test. Two group comparisons will be made with independent two sample t-test for normally distributed variables and with Mann-Whitney U test for variables that do not show normal distribution. Comparisons of the groups' pre-test, week 6, week 18 and week 24 scale scores will be made with two-way analysis of variance in repeated measures from general linear models.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be between 18-70 years old,
  • Becoming literate,
  • Living in the city center
  • Having had a heart attack within the last month,
  • Not having had a heart attack before,
  • Dyspnea less than 4-5 degrees according to the modified Borg Scale
  • No deformity or diagnosis related to the musculoskeletal system that may prevent physical activity, no orthopedic limitation
  • Stable New York Heart Association (NHYA) functional class I or II coronary artery disease with myocardial infarction

Exclusion Criteria:

Those with communication disabilities such as speech, vision, hearing

  • Dyspnea score of more than 4-5 degrees according to the modified Borg Scale
  • Those who stayed in intensive care for a long time after MI
  • Complications related to treatment and interventions after MI
  • Those who underwent surgical treatment after MI,
  • Those with chronic diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, hypertension, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, rheumatic valve disease, cancer diagnosis, etc.)
  • Those who indicated that they would not participate in intervention programs due to time constraints.
  • Failure of the six-minute walk test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Experimental: Intervention group
Behavioral Interventions will be provided to the intervention group using the Cardiac Rehabilitation Program based on the Health Action Process Approach Model.
The intervention program will start in the hospital setting and continue at home. A work schedule will be created with each individual in intervention group 1 by determining the times when they are available separately. Individuals are planned to receive 60-minute home visits once a week. In the following weeks, care interventions such as home visits, training, counseling and monitoring will be organized according to the specific needs and requirements of each individual. In the face-to-face preparation phase, the patient's health needs will be identified, health status will be assessed, daily activities will be reviewed, incompatibility between activity levels and recommended exercise guidelines will be examined, and individualized exercise goals and a behavior-specific exercise program will be created for behavioral changes. In the intervention phase, the parts that the patient lacks will be determined and the trainings needed will be given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in treatment compliance of people participating in the Health Action Process Approach Model-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Time Frame: At the beginning of the study (week 0), week 6, week 12 and week 24
It was developed by Morisky et al. in 1986. It is a 6-item scale used to measure medication compliance in patients.
At the beginning of the study (week 0), week 6, week 12 and week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Quality of Life of People Participating in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Based on the Health Action Process Approach Model
Time Frame: At the beginning of the study (week 0), week 6, week 12 and week 24
Developed in 2002 by Thompson et al, this scale is specific for patients with myocardial infarction. It is a 35-item scale used to measure quality of life in patients.
At the beginning of the study (week 0), week 6, week 12 and week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Attack Patients

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Based on Health Action Process Approach Model

Subscribe