Urinary Proteomics to Guide Early Intervention to Prevent Complications in Type 2 Diabetes - a Feasibility Study (SIGNAL)

December 15, 2025 updated by: Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

SIGNAL - Body Fluid Proteome SIGnatures for persoNALised Intervention to Prevent Cardiovascular and Renal Complications in Diabetes

Title:

Body fluid proteome SIGnatures for persoNALised intervention to prevent cardiovascular and renal complications in diabetes.

Aim:

To explore the feasibility of using urinary proteomic risk scores in clinical practice to identify patients at risk of developing end organ damage and identify which patients should receive additional renocardiovascular protective treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Diabetes and its associated complications impose a significant burden on both patients and societies. Despite advancements in lowering blood glucose, the elevated risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a pressing concern, underscoring the need for optimized prevention strategies and improved therapeutic options. Recent developments in glucose-lowering drugs, such as sodium-glucosecotransporter- 2-inhibitors (SGLT2-i) and glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), as well as the use of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (nsMRA) finerenone, have shown promising cardiovascular and renal protection. Currently, there is no reliable method for predicting personalized treatment responses in diabetic complications. Consequently, benefits of treatment are under dispute, due to a large number of patients not responding. The use of SGLT2-i, nsMRA and GLP1-RA in CKD has happened largely in parallel, all agents have demonstrated benefit, but it is not yet clear how to prioritize between the drugs or if all should be combined. This study builds upon previous scientific work that have investigated the urine proteome and identified several biomarkers able to predict early diabetes associated complications.

CKD273 urine proteomic risk score is a well-established tool used to predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. CAD160 is urine proteomic risk score to predict the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). HF2 urine proteomic classifier is used to predict the risk of heart failure (HF).

Urine sample analysis is based on capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry (CE-MS) to determine these risk scores.

Urine proteomic scores are continous numerical values. Higher score means that the urinary peptide pattern is more similar to that of patients with progressive disease. A lower score indicates a peptide profile more typical of healthy individuals.

In addition a Support Vector Machine (SVM), a supervised machine learning algorithm will perform in silico treatment simulations and calculate the change in classification scores for 3 different potential interventions: GLP1-RA semaglutide, SGT2-i dapagliflozin and GLP1-RA finerenone. Based on these changes (with the largest beneficial change indicating the most effective treatment), the most suitable intervention can be selected and the participent will be allocated.

Design:

Single-centre, open-label, parallel group (intervention group) with 6 months intervention.

Population:

Type 2 diabetes without history of heart failure NYHA Class IV or advanced diabetic kidney disease with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 or urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) > 200 mg/g.

Objectives:

To assess the feasibility of using proteomic classifiers in clinical practice for response prediction in a prospective study. We will use urinary proteomic classifiers: CKD273, CAD160 and HF2 to identify patients suited for additional medical treatment with sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2 (SGLT2)- inhibitors, glucagon-like-peptide-1 GLP-1 receptor agonists or non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist.

Interventions:

The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin 10 mg daily, the nsMRA finerenone 10-20 mg daily, and the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide 0.25-1.0 mg once weekly. The medication will be given stepwise according to a prespecified algorithm and guided by the response on UACR.

Endpoints:

Primary endpoint is feasibility of using urinary proteomic classifiers in clinical practice, while secondary endpoints are changes in UACR and urinary proteomic signatures after 6 months of treatment.

Time schedule:

The study is expected to start inclusion June 1st 2025. The recruitment period is 6 months, the intervention period is 6 months and hence the study is expected to be terminated May 31st 2026.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hajdú-Bihar
      • Herlev, Hajdú-Bihar, Denmark, 2730
        • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women over 18 years of age.
  2. Type 2 diabetes with no clinical signs of HF NYHA Class IV
  3. Able to understand the written participant information and give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Heart failure NYHA class IV at screening
  2. Moderately - or severely increased albuminuria with a UACR ≥ 200 mg/g or CKD with an eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 at the screening visit.
  3. A female who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or intends to become pregnant, or women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) who are not using highly effective contraceptive methods.
  4. Receiving therapy with all three of the study medication prior to enrolment.
  5. Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischemic attack within 12 weeks prior to enrolment
  6. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the study medications or related products
  7. History of pancreatitis at the screening visit
  8. Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 at the screening visit
  9. Type 1 diabetes
  10. Serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L at the screening visit
  11. Addison's Disease
  12. Concomitant treatment with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., itraconazole, ketoconazole, ritonavir, nelfinavir, cobicistat, clarithromycin, telithromycin, nefazodone)
  13. Treatment with a potassium-sparing diuretic (amiloride, triamterene)
  14. Treatment with other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist than finerenone (e.g., spironolactone, eplerenone, esaxerenone, canrenone)
  15. Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) > 3x upper normal limit, autoimmune hepatitis, and/or severe hepatic impairment (including but not limited to a history of hepatic encephalopathy, a history of oesophageal varices or a history of portocaval shunt.)
  16. Autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease
  17. Lupus nephritis or ANCA-associated vasculitis, or any other primary or secondary kidney disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy within 6 months prior to screening
  18. Kidney transplant or dialysis
  19. Presence or history of malignant neoplasms (except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer) within five years before screening.
  20. Any other history, condition, therapy, or uncontrolled intercurrent illness that could, as judged by the investigator, affect participant safety or compliance with study requirements.
  21. Known or suspected abuse of narcotics.
  22. Participant in another intervention study,
  23. Vulnerable (i.e., under guardianship) or mentally incapacitated subjects (i.e., not able to understand and sign the informed consent)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Semaglutide

3 urine proteomic risk scores will be measured in the study. The CKD273 urine proteomic risk score, a well-established tool used to predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, CAD160 urine proteomic risk score to predict the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and HF2 urine proteomic classifier to predict the risk of heart failure (HF).

In addition a Support Vector Machine (SVM), a supervised machine learning algorithm will perform in silico treatment simulations and calculate the change in classification scores for 3 different potential interventions: GLP1-RA semaglutide, SGT2-i dapagliflozin and GLP1-RA finerenone. Based on these changes (with the largest beneficial change indicating the most effective treatment), the most suitable intervention can be selected and the participent will be allocated.

Semaglutide will be introduced at a dose of 0.25 mg/week subcutaneous injection, escalated to 0.5 and 1.0 mg/week after 4 and 8 weeks if tolerated.
Other Names:
  • Ozempic
Active Comparator: Finerenone
3 urine proteomic risk scores will be measured in the study. The CKD273 urine proteomic risk score, a well-established tool used to predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, CAD160 urine proteomic risk score to predict the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and HF2 urine proteomic classifier to predict the risk of heart failure (HF). In addition a Support Vector Machine (SVM), a supervised machine learning algorithm will perform in silico treatment simulations and calculate the change in classification scores for 3 different potential interventions: GLP1-RA semaglutide, SGT2-i dapagliflozin and GLP1-RA finerenone. Based on these changes (with the largest beneficial change indicating the most effective treatment), the most suitable intervention can be selected and the participent will be allocated.
Finerenone will be introduced at a dose of 10 mg/day in patients with a serum potassium level < 4.8 mmol/l and eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and escalated to 20 mg/day after 4 weeks if the serum potassium level is still < 4.8 mmol/l. Starting dose is 20 mg/day if eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The dosage will be reduced or discontinued in patients who develop hyperkalemia (serum potassium > 5.5 mmol/l).
Active Comparator: Dapagliflozin
3 urine proteomic risk scores will be measured in the study. The CKD273 urine proteomic risk score, a well-established tool used to predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, CAD160 urine proteomic risk score to predict the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and HF2 urine proteomic classifier to predict the risk of heart failure (HF). In addition a Support Vector Machine (SVM), a supervised machine learning algorithm will perform in silico treatment simulations and calculate the change in classification scores for 3 different potential interventions: GLP1-RA semaglutide, SGT2-i dapagliflozin and GLP1-RA finerenone. Based on these changes (with the largest beneficial change indicating the most effective treatment), the most suitable intervention can be selected and the participent will be allocated.
Dapagliflozin will be introduced at a dose of 10 mg/day. The dose can be reduced at any time during the trial if required by the subject's tolerance to the product.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proteomic feasibility
Time Frame: 2 weeks from sampling
Achieve urine proteomic results within 2 weeks of sampling for at least 90% of the participants in clinical practice.
2 weeks from sampling
Evaluation of medical treatment
Time Frame: 3 weeks from sampling
Ensure that urine proteomic results are interpreted for evaluating medical treatment in at least 90% of participants.
3 weeks from sampling

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio
Time Frame: Over the 6 month of the follow up from screening visit to the end of study.
Changes in UACR from screening visit to the end of study
Over the 6 month of the follow up from screening visit to the end of study.
Urinary proteomic signatures
Time Frame: Over the 6 month of the follow up from screening visit to the end of study.

Changes in urinary proteomic signatures from screening visit to the end of study:

Urine proteomic risk scores are continous numerical values. Higher score means urinary peptide pattern is more similar to that of patients with progressive disease. A lower score indicates a peptide profile more typical of healthy individuals.

CKD273, CAD160 and HF2 urine proteomic risk-scores and their changes will be measured from urine samples during the study.

Over the 6 month of the follow up from screening visit to the end of study.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of health economics
Time Frame: 6 months from all participent data is collected

Potential adoption of biomarkers in clinical practice for patient stratification requires the evaluation of cost-effectiveness compared to current gold standards.

During he cost effectiveness analysis, health economic modelling will be performed to translate implementation of the molecular predictors into quantitative estimates of clinical and economic benefits and costs incomparison to the standard of care. Markov models will be developed using specialized software (TreeAge Healthcare Pro software, Williamstown, USA) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) will be calculated. The analysis will be conducted and reported according to CHEERS Statement.

6 months from all participent data is collected

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Rossing, Clinical Professor, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Albuminuria

Clinical Trials on Semaglutide, 1.34 mg/mL

Subscribe