Sensory Integration Versus Bobath on Hand Function in Hemiplegia

Sensory Motor Integration Versus Bobath Approach on Hand Functions in Hemiplegia Cerebral Palsy Children

Hand skills do not develop in isolation; it is the result of neurologic development, physiologic maturation and adaptation, and functional development of learned patterns of motion and motor learning Hand skills in HCP are very complex and sensitive as it considered the main issue in playing and achieving milestones, so identification of this problem and its solution is very essential and play a miserable rule in adaptive response which is a basis of child's occupation. so, the current study is conducting to investigate the difference between sensory motor integration approach and bobath technique on hand function as manual dexterity, fine motor precision and fine motor integration on children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Children With Hemiplegia
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: bobath technique; Other: sensory motor integration

Detailed Description

Sensory integration therapy is the therapeutic mechanism of pediatrics through sensory augmentation which involves the child in enriched playful tasks, promoting a meaningful motor response. The sensory integration theories assume that an affected sensory reception would result in a defect or delay in the development of milestones among children with motor disorders.

The bobath approach provided a new reference aimed to normalize tone and facilitate volitional and automatic movement which tailors based on the patient's individual problems and situational context to manage problems with movement against gravity and postural control Participants will be assigned randomly into two groups of equal number (study group 1 and study group 2 )26 child in each group

• Study group "1" will receive regular physical therapy in addition to sensory motor integration for 45 minutes/time ,3 days per week for 3 months Treatment program included two parts: tactile sensation and proprioception stimulation programs. Each of them accounted half of the session

• Study group"2" will receive regular physical therapy in addition to bobath therapy for 45 minutes/time 3 days per week for 3 months in the form of:

  1. Preparation phase
  2. Intervention program (Movement facilitation &Functional training) base line assessment and after three months re assessment will be taken for both groups using surface electromyography and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2nd Edition

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 52
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Giza, Egypt
    • Faculty of physical therapy Dokki,Giza Egypt,

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ranges from 6 to 12 years.
2. Both genders.
3. Diagnosis of hemiplegia.
4. Level II-III on Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
5. Spasticity grade 2 to 3 on Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
6. Level II-III on Gross Motor Classification System (GMCS)

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Significant mental or psychological problems.
2. Significant visual/auditory problem.
3. Botox injection and/or surgery of the affected upper limb in the past 12 months.
4. Surgical procedures of the affected upper limb.
5. Fixed deformities in the affected upper limb.

6. Comorbid physical diseases such as myopathy, neuropathy, and other central and peripheral nervous system disorders.

   -

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Subjects will be randomly allocated in to equal two study groups: - Study group "1" will receiv; Subjects will be randomly allocated in to equal two study groups 26 in each group; Study group "1" will receive regular physical therapy for 45 minutes/time in addition to sensory motor integration for 45 minutes/time 3 days per week for 3 months
Experimental: - Study group "2" will receive regular physical therapy for 45 minutes/time in addition to bobath	Other: bobath technique; *study group ( 2) bobath techniquefor 45 minutes/time 3 days per week for 3 months in the form of: Preparation phase; Intervention program (Movement facilitation &Functional training)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Hand functions	Hand functions as manual dexterity, fine motor precision and fine motor integration will be assessed using Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2nd Edition	45-60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Spasticity	Spasticity will be assessed using electromyographic apparatus (H/M ratio )	10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Cairo University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 1, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): December 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 27, 2025
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 24, 2025
• First Posted (Actual): May 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 2, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 24, 2025
• Last Verified: April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Hand function; sensory integration
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neurologic Manifestations; Nervous System Diseases; Paralysis; Hemiplegia
• Other Study ID Numbers: P.T.RCT/012/005588; radwa gomaa abd el AZIZ (Registry Identifier: radwa gomaa abd el AZIZ)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No