A Socio-Technological Intervention in Community-Based Healthcare for Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment (DHEAL-COM-MCI) (DHEAL-COM-MCI)

The objectives of the intervention are to counteract the progression of cognitive decline, enhance the intrinsic abilities of users and support the well-being of elderly people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through a socio-technical intervention that includes cognitive stimulation, technology and robotics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The DHEAL-COM-MCI trial is a feasibility pilot with single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial type experimental design. Fifty older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) will be recruited for the study and randomized into two groups: the experimental group, that will perform a stimulation using a specific software, and the control group. Patients in the control group will be offered activities to perform at home, with the same frequency, in line with the usual care activities already proposed by the Neurology Unit. In order to follow the cognitive training, the participants of the Experimental group will receive the following technological devices:

  • the software BRAINER, a web platform dedicated to cognitive rehabilitation exercises over 5 different domains such as complex attention, executive function, learning and memory, language and perceptual- motor skills. A dedicated tablet will be provided to the participants to use the Brainer;
  • the social robot NAOv6, a fully programmable robot that can interact through its sensors and speech capabilities (i.e RGB camera, ultrasonic proximity sensors on the chest, two microphones, and tactile sensors on the head, hands, feet, and shoulders). NAO is also able to move thanks to multiple joints and actuators, and perform multiple and very complex movements. It can also understand people's language and emotions, as well as respond correctly to any request by speaking and making appropriate gestures;
  • In addition, as both NAO and the BRAINER need an internet connection, a webpocket equipped with a SIM card will be given to the user, to allow the 4G connection of the devices. In this way, the functioning of the equipment is guaranteed for the whole period of testing independently of the user's private home/mobile Wi-Fi.

Participants in the Control Group (CG) will receive a booklet containing information and activities on well-being (Appendix A). They will be invited to do whatever they wish with the information booklet and the proposed exercises.

The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate the perceived stability of the cognitive abilities of older adults with MCI after 12-week of intervention through the MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment;
  • MoCA ranged 21 - 27;
  • Geriatric Depression Scale 5 items (GDS-5items) ≤ 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of active implantable or non-implantable medical devices;
  • Nickel allergy;
  • Myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months;
  • Painful arthritis, spinal stenosis, amputation, painful foot lesions, or neuropathy that limits balance and mobility;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension;
  • Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator;
  • Metastatic cancer or immunosuppressive therapy;
  • Significant vision or hearing disturbances.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control Group
Participants in the Control Group will receive a booklet containing information and activities on well-being.
The subjects will receive a booklet containing information and activities on well-being. They will be invited to do whatever they wish with the information booklet and the proposed exercises, as they would do outside the framework of the experiment. In any case, they will be free to read and do the proposed exercises.
Experimental: cognitive stimulation arm
Daily cognitive stimulation at home with specific software (Brainer) and 1 group session per week, for a total of 12 weeks. Furthermore, each participant will receive the NAO robot at home for a month.
A daily cognitive stimulation at home with specific software (Brainer) and 1 group session per week. Furthermore, each participant will receive the NAO robot at home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cognitive capabilities of older people with MCI
Time Frame: at baseline and 12 weeks later
It will be assessed through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The MoCA is a one-page 30-point test administered in approximately 10 minutes. The MoCA assesses several cognitive domains: the short-term memory recall task (5 points), visuospatial abilities (4 points), alternation task (1 point), verbal abstraction task (1 point), attention, concentration, and working memory (6 points), language (6 points), abstract reasoning (2 points), and orientation to time and place (6 points). A score of 26 or above is typically considered within the normal range; scores between 18 and 25 may suggest mild cognitive impairment; scores between 10 and 17 may indicate moderate cognitive impairment; scores below 10 may indicate severe cognitive impairment.
at baseline and 12 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fragility
Time Frame: at baseline and 12 weeks later
It will be assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). This descriptive scale divides the older participants into 9 classes based on the information provided by them and their relatives: between 1 and 3 the patient is non-frail, pre-frail if 4, he is frail from 5 to 9.
at baseline and 12 weeks later
Psychological Wellbeing
Time Frame: at baseline and 12 weeks later
The Psychological Wellbeing Scale (PWB) consists of several subscales (self acceptance, positive relationships with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth) that measures six aspects of wellbeing and happiness. Individuals respond to the 42 items. Each of the 42 items is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree"). The total score can range from 42 to 294, with higher scores indicating greater overall psychological well-being.
at baseline and 12 weeks later
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: at baseline and 12 weeks later

The health related quality of life will be evaluated by EQ-5D-5L. The scale consists of five dimensions: mobility, independence, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health status by ticking the box corresponding to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The numbers from the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the health status of the participant. A person reporting "no problems" in all five dimensions would have a health state profile of 11111 (representing full health).

A person with "slight problems with mobility (2), no problems with self-care (1), moderate problems with usual activities (3), severe pain/discomfort (4), and no anxiety/depression (1)" would have a health state profile of 21341.

The "worst possible health state" would be 55555.

at baseline and 12 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Roberta Bevilacqua, PhD, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INRCA_005_2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on socio-technical intervention

Subscribe