Comparison of Needling and Microneedling Plus Phototherapy in Localized Vitiligo Patients

August 25, 2025 updated by: Huma Gul, Khyber Teaching Hospital

Puncture to Repigment: A Comparative Analysis Of Needling vs. Microneedling Along With NBUVB in Treatment of Non-Segmental Vitiligo

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of needling versus microneedling, both followed by narrowband UVB therapy, in achieving repigmentation in patients with localized stable non-segmental vitiligo.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will enroll 80 patients aged 15-60 years with localized stable vitiligo. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one receiving needling and the other microneedling, each followed by NBUVB therapy. The primary outcome is the percentage of repigmentation at 12 weeks, assessed through digital planimetry and standardized clinical photography. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects such as erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, infection, and scarring.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Huma Gul Doctor, MBBS
  • Phone Number: +923177627046 +923471927046
  • Email: xaffar965@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
      • Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, 25000
        • Recruiting
        • Khyber Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both male and female
  • Age 15-60 years
  • Patients having vitiligo for more than 1 year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with tendency of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring
  • Patients with any bleeding disorder, coagulation defect or using anti platelets
  • Any local infection at the treatment site
  • Patients who had received systemic therapy in last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Needling + NBUVB(Group A)
Participants in this arm will undergo microneedling using a Dermapen device with 1.5 mm needles to create controlled micro-injuries in depigmented skin to enhance melanocyte migration and repigmentation. This procedure will be performed once every four weeks for six sessions.
Active Comparator: Microneedling + NBUVB(Group B)
Participants in this arm will undergo needling using a sterile 30G (4mm) needle to manually puncture and implant melanocytes from perilesional pigmented skin into depigmented lesions. The procedure will be performed once every four weeks for a total of six sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment efficacy
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Efficacy will be assessed at 12 weeks using the Physician's Global Assessment Scale. Improvement is defined as ≥25% repigmentation of vitiliginous patches, measured via digital planimetry and standardized clinical photography. The higher the score, the more effective is the treatment modality.

0-25% re pigmentation= Mildimprovement 25-50% re pigmentation= Moderate improvement 51-75% re pigmentation= Good 76-100% re pigmentation= Excellent to complete

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 12 weeks
erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, infection, scarring
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Huma Gul Doctor, MBBS, Khyber Teaching Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Patient's confidentiality may not be breached

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitiligo

Clinical Trials on Microneedling + NBUVB

Subscribe