ACT-Based Intervention for Problem Gambling (jugACT)

July 15, 2025 updated by: Universidad Europea de Madrid

Efficacy of a Group Intervention Grounded in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to Address Problem Gambling in Youth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to study if Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is effective to treat Problem Gambling in young adults.The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does ACT therapy improve health and gambling behavior?
  • Are the clinical improvements of youth with gambling disorder receiving ACT-based intervention significantly greater than the clinical improvements of youth with gambling disorder on the waiting list?

Researchers will assess whether changes in health, gambling behavior, and other psychological variables are observed after eight weeks of therapy.

Participants will:

  • Attend weekly online group sessions for 8 weeks
  • Learn new tools that they will put into practice after the sessions
  • Be required to complete evaluation questionnaires before and after the intervention and at the 3- and 6-month follow-up

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study, all patients giving written informed consent will be assessed to determine eligibility for study entry.

Patients who meet eligibility requirements will receive psychological intervention consisting in an 8-session group on line-delivered ACT-based treatment.

The participants will be assessed through self-report instruments before and after treatment and at 3 and 6 months follow-up.

The clinical trial will include a control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 25 years
  • Score ≥ 3 on the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI)
  • Comprehension of Spanish, online connection, and signed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In active psychological or pharmacological treatment for gambling disorder
  • Having received ACT-based psychological treatment in the last 6 months
  • Problematic substance use: CAGE Adapted to Include Drugs Questionnaire (CAGE-AID) score ≥ 3
  • Difficulty consistently attending online sessions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ACT group
8 individual weekly sessions which included ACT methods
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy methods were focused on promoting Values clarification, Acceptance, Cognitive defusion, Committed action and Flexible attention to the present moment, and included methods such as the Garden Metaphor or defusion training.
No Intervention: Waiting list
Participants assigned to Waiting List arm waited for 2 months before receiving treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline severity of problem gambling at 8 months
The PGSI is a 9-item, 4-point Likert-format self-report scale (0 = never, 3 = almost always) that assesses the severity of problem gambling. Scores range from 0 to 27. A score of 8 or higher is considered indicative of problem gambling. Higher scores indicate greater severity of the disorder.
Change from Baseline severity of problem gambling at 8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-28)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline emotion regulation at 8 months
he DERS-28 is a 28-item questionnaire with a 5-point Likert format (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) that assesses difficulties in emotion regulation. It consists of six subscales: emotional nonacceptance, difficulty achieving goals, impulsivity, emotional awareness, limited strategies, and emotional clarity. Higher scores indicate greater difficulties in emotional regulation and worse clinical outcomes.
Change from Baseline emotion regulation at 8 months
Change in General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline psychological distress and perceived general health at 8 months
The GHQ-12 is a 12-item self-report questionnaire designed to detect general psychological symptoms. It is answered on a 4-point Likert-type scale. Higher scores reflect greater psychological distress and poorer perceived general health.
Change from Baseline psychological distress and perceived general health at 8 months
Change in the Comprehensive ACT Process Assessment Questionnaire (CompACT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline psychological flexibility at 8 months
The CompACT is a 23-item, 7-point Likert-format scale (0 = not at all true, 6 = completely true) that assesses psychological flexibility, a core process of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. It includes three subscales: openness to experience, awareness, and committed action. Higher scores reflect greater psychological flexibility.
Change from Baseline psychological flexibility at 8 months
Change in Values Living Questionnaire (VLQ)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline value-behavior alignment at 8 months
The Valued Living Questionnaire assesses the degree of perceived importance and consistency of action directed toward personal values in 10 life domains (family, work, health, leisure, etc.). Each item is scored from 1 to 10. A composite index of discrepancy between importance and action is calculated. Higher scores indicate less value-behavior alignment.
Change from Baseline value-behavior alignment at 8 months
Change in Gambling-Related Emotional Distress Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline gambling-related distress at 8 months
A weekly subjective scale assessing the frequency and intensity of emotional distress associated with gambling behavior using Likert scales ranging from 0 to 5. Higher scores reflect greater gambling-related distress.
Change from Baseline gambling-related distress at 8 months
Change in Gambling-Related Experiential Avoidance scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Experiential Avoidance at 8 months
A weekly subjective scale assessing the extent to which the participant has attempted to avoid gambling-related emotions, thoughts, or internal situations. Higher scores indicate greater experiential avoidance and less flexibility.
Change from Baseline Experiential Avoidance at 8 months
Change in the frequency of self-reported gambling behaviors
Time Frame: Change from Baseline gambling behaviors at 8 months
Daily self-monitoring in which the participant indicates whether they gambled, the duration, type of gambling, emotions before, during, and after, and perceived function of the behavior. Weekly frequency of gambling episodes will be analyzed. Higher frequency is interpreted as worse clinical outcome.
Change from Baseline gambling behaviors at 8 months
Change in the frequency of committed actions
Time Frame: Change from Baseline committed actions at 8 months
Self-monitoring of the frequency with which the participant has acted in accordance with their personal values during moments of desire to gamble. This is considered a positive behavioral indicator of change.
Change from Baseline committed actions at 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francisco Montesinos, Ph.D., Universidad Europea de Madrid
  • Principal Investigator: David Lobato, Ph.D., Universidad Europea de Madrid

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Problem Gambling

Clinical Trials on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

3
Subscribe