Impact of 3D-Printed Anatomical Model on Patient Understanding in Orthognathic Surgery

July 6, 2025 updated by: Razan Baabdullah, King Abdulaziz University

Impact of 3D-Printed Anatomical Models on Patient Understanding, Anxiety, Patient-Doctor Relationship, and Overall Satisfaction During the Informed Consent Process in Orthognathic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether using three dimensional (3D)-printed anatomical models improves the informed consent process for participants undergoing orthognathic surgery. The trial also explores how these models affect participants understanding, anxiety, satisfaction, and communication with the surgeon.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Do 3D-printed anatomical models improve participants understanding of their jaw condition and the surgical procedure?
  • Do they reduce participants anxiety before surgery?
  • Do they enhance overall participants satisfaction and the physician-patient relationship?

Researchers compares participants who received standard two dimensional (2D) imaging and verbal explanations with those who received the same information plus 3D-printed jaw models.

Participants:

  • Scheduled for double- or triple-jaw orthognathic surgery
  • Randomly assigned to receive either traditional 2D education or the 3D-printed model intervention
  • Complete a validated questionnaires assessing understanding, anxiety, satisfaction, and doctor-patient communication

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
        • Recruiting
        • King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Makkah
      • Jeddah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
        • Completed
        • Razan Baabdullah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (aged 18 and above)
  • Scheduled for orthognathic surgery (specifically double-jaw or triple-jaw procedures)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients (under 18 years old)
  • Patients undergoing re-do/revision surgery
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders
  • Patients receiving only orthodontic treatment
  • Patients undergoing single-jaw surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2D Surgical Simulation
This group received an orthognathic surgery consultation incorporating two-dimensional images generated from virtual surgical planning. These images illustrated the patient's current skeletal deformity and the anticipated surgical movements, providing a visual aid to enhance understanding and facilitate informed decision-making.
Two-dimensional images generated from virtual surgical planning-one depicting a Class II skeletal deformity and the other a Class III malocclusion-are used to illustrate the patient's condition and demonstrate the anticipated surgical movements.
Experimental: 3D Surgical Simulation
This group received an orthognathic surgery consultation using 3D-printed anatomical models. The models, representing skeletal Class II and Class III deformities, were customized and modified to simulate osteotomies. During the consultation, these models are used to demonstrate the planned surgical movements, providing patients with a tangible, visual understanding of their condition and the proposed treatment.
Two standardized 3D-printed anatomical models were created-one representing skeletal Class II and the other skeletal Class III. Simulated osteotomies, including Le Fort I and Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies, were performed on the models to demonstrate surgical movements. These models are used to help patients visualize the procedures planned for their specific cases.
Other Names:
  • 3d-printed anatomical models

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient understanding
Time Frame: Baseline
Patient comprehension scores of their jaw condition, planned surgical procedures (Le Fort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and genioplasty), potential complications, expected outcomes, and the overall consent process, measured by a structured questionnaire at the time of consent.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety level
Time Frame: Baseline
Patient anxiety levels related to orthognathic surgery, as measured by the validated Arabic version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), a 20-item self-administered questionnaire.
Baseline
Patient-doctor relationship
Time Frame: Baseline
Scores for quality of communication and trust between patient and surgeon, as measured by the Arabic version of the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9).
Baseline
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Patient satisfaction scores regarding the consultation and informed consent process, as measured by the validated Arabic version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Razan M Baabdullah, BDS,MS,FRCDC, King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on 2D Visual Representations of Skeletal Movements in Orthognathic Surgery

3
Subscribe